Do not mock national alerts
Taiwan’s defense ministry on Tuesday afternoon last week sent out a nationwide emergency alert informing the public that China’s government at 3:04pm had just launched a satellite with its trajectory passing over southern Taiwan.
As a nation sitting along multiple fault lines in a highly active seismic zone and open to tsunamis on its Pacific coast, Taiwanese cannot afford to be too relaxed with their soft living and should stay vigilant.
One after another, from the Dutch colonization in earlier times to the Rover Incident and later Japanese colonization, Taiwan is no stranger to foreign invasion, and Chinese aggression is certainly Taiwan’s biggest concern.
However, following the alert, there have been online memes and sarcastic remarks mocking it. Some have even said the national-level alert was a Democratic Progressive Party election “ploy to boost its campaign,” which was a most dispiriting and embittering thing to say. How could anyone be so naive and ignorant?
Police stations across the nation conduct daily tests of the civil defense alert system, just in case major emergencies such as earthquakes, tsunamis or air raids occur. The alerts are to inform community members on how to respond and other implementable actions. Would anyone still consider such a measure to be “campaigning”?
Confucius once said “A man who does not think and plan long ahead is sure to find trouble right at his door.”
Japan is able to keep its casualties and damage to a minimum whenever disasters strike, because its people have long put great emphasis on alert and warning systems.
Although Taiwanese have complete freedom to express different opinions, mocking the national alert system is not the right mindset.
Chen Hsueh-chiang
Taipei
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,