China’s disappointing recovery appears to be suffering another indignity. Neighbors whose economic fortunes were supposed to be tied to the heft of the country’s rebound from the pandemic seem to be doing pretty well without it. Far from being pushed into a slump, some bellwethers had a thoroughly respectable year.
Singapore, which had been dogged for part of last year by fear of recession, finished strongly. South Korea’s economy closed out December with solid momentum. Markets across Asia have been obsessed with when the Federal Reserve will begin to cut interest rates; the prospect of the People’s Bank of China further reducing borrowing costs is met with a yawn. Even the slight strengthening in the yuan can be attributed as much to Fed Chair Jerome Powell as Beijing’s efforts to put a floor under the expansion.
This is not the way things were meant to be. Bullishness about China, and its ability to propel the rest of Asia, was abundant when Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) began to dismantle his zero COVID policy in the closing months of 2022. Prospects for the region were considered intimately linked to Beijing.
However, as China’s rebound faded, it became commonplace to proclaim that this implied bad tidings for regional economies. That they did not bomb suggests there is a broader shift at work.
Perhaps Asia’s economic fate is not tethered so strongly to China after all. Or, if it is, there are at least some important nuances. Some thinking looks out of date. As a reporter arriving in Washington in 1998, the common refrain was that where Japan goes, so does the rest of Asia. I was skeptical: Southeast Asia enjoyed six years of dizzying expansion after Japan’s property bubble burst around 1990. Before leaving the US to undertake my current assignment in Singapore, there was no shortage of people telling me Asia was China and China was Asia. It might be time to question that assertion.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc had a wake-up call. It anchored hopes for a strong year last year in part on a buoyant China — and the prospect that such encouraging conditions would translate into an epic year for emerging markets, generally. “The first lesson is that you want to treat EM and EM ex-China differently,” Kamakshya Trivedi, Goldman’s head of global currency, rates and emerging-markets strategy, told Bloomberg News in December.
Also instructive was the resilience of developing economies in the face of factors that ought to have brought them undone: rate hikes in the US, a muscular dollar and slackening Chinese growth, he said.
Reports this week bear out that reasoning: Singapore, a small economy wedded to the ebbs and flows of global commerce, grew faster than anticipated last year. In the fourth quarter alone, gross domestic product gained 2.8 percent from a year earlier. Exports, so vital for the city-state, returned to growth in November, and factory output, which had been languishing, enjoyed a spurt. The news from Seoul was also refreshing. Exports emerged from a slump as the year drew to a close; in December, they jumped 5.5 percent, handily beating economists’ forecasts. Adjusted for working days, shipments climbed an impressive 14.5 percent. South Korea is a critical player in the global technology ecosystem, and the data might point to something more fundamental than a pickup in the economy. “The US has once again passed China as South Korea’s biggest export market,” Hyosung Kwon at Bloomberg Economics wrote. “This may signal a lasting shift in the shape of supply chains — not a blip.”
It is not like China’s struggles are having zero impact on the rest of Asia. The latest purchasing managers’ indices suggest factories are not having the best of times. Most of them saw a retreat in new orders and tepid customer appetite.
However, the point is, some of the most important economies in this part of the world are doing okay — or better — despite their larger neighbor’s woes.
The health of China’s economy would always be a factor in how the region fares, in much the same way that Canada and Mexico depend greatly on the US. However, it is worth remembering that China is one of a range of issues, not the sole determinant. That is hardly an earth-shattering observation, but one that got a bit lost over the years in fawning over its ascent.
Time for a recalibration. Now that would be a big export.
Daniel Moss is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian economies. Previously, he was executive editor for economics at Bloomberg News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
RSS