A big frustration of writing about climate change is that it is wildly difficult to get people to care about the subject unless they happen to be, say, unexpectedly choking on wildfire smoke hundreds of kilometers from the nearest wildfire or escaping a flooded basement after a random rainstorm turns Biblical.
The sense of failing to convey to your stovetop mates that you are all boiling alive was hammered home last week by a new survey showing that young people — humanity’s hope for the future, supposedly — care more about inflation than they do about climate change.
This in the middle of what will probably be the hottest year in human history, wracked with deadly floods, droughts, heat waves and wildfires.
Illustration: Mountain People
On the one hand, this suggests “climate Cassandra” is a poor career choice. On the other, it makes total sense.
Although my memories of young adulthood are hazy, one lingering sensation is relentless financial dread. And today’s youths have it far worse than I ever did. College, healthcare and housing expenses have soared in the past few decades, followed by food and other prices since the COVID-19 pandemic. It is tough to focus on the future of the climate when your stomach is grumbling and you are not sure you can cover the rent.
However, the reality is that climate change and inflation are increasingly, inextricably linked. A hotter planet makes droughts, floods, heat waves and destructive storms more likely and more intense. Rainfall patterns change and diseases roam more widely. All of this in turn disrupts agriculture, construction, shipping, manufacturing and more.
Natural disasters and rising sea levels will leave some parts of the US inhabitable only by the very wealthy, making affordable housing even more scarce.
The pandemic’s inflationary supply-chain nightmares were just a preview of what might be in store.
One heat wave alone boosted European food prices by 0.67 percent last year, according to a recent study by the European Central Bank and the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.
Future warming could raise global food inflation by 0.9 to 3.3 percent a year by 2035, the study suggested, depending partly on how hot we let the planet get by then.
Total inflation could be 0.3 to 1.2 percent higher a year. Food inflation is typically more volatile than “headline” inflation; hence the bigger potential swings.
Global corn production could fall 6 percent by the end of the century under even the most optimistic carbon emissions forecasts, according to a 2021 study by NASA and a host of other researchers. And most of that effect would happen before 2040.
By that time, every county in Iowa will experience at least a 45 percent increase in the number of days under corn-killing temperatures, according to a study by New York-based non-profit the Environmental Defense Fund.
This summer in the US alone, everyone from Nebraska cattle ranchers to Long Island, New York, kelp harvesters suffered lower yields as land and sea broiled under record temperatures.
A June study in the journal Nature warned that wheat growers in the US and China are not prepared for just how much more destructive future heat waves will be.
Meanwhile, storms, water shortages and power failures will disrupt manufacturing. Heat will threaten the health of farm, construction and other outdoor workers and trigger demands for higher pay and better conditions. Shrinking rivers will slow container shipping. Millions of US homes are at risk of catastrophic flooding and their owners do not even know it.
All of this spells supply headaches and higher prices.
Technology can help us adapt to a hotter future, at least somewhat. Farmers can use land and water more efficiently and breed heat-resistant crop strains. Businesses can weatherproof their infrastructure and diversify their supply chains.
However, all of that will be pricey, at least in the short term, adding still more inflationary pressure. Developing nations will struggle to keep up without expensive assistance from the developed world.
Fending off the worst of climate change, and the inflation and disruption it brings, will not be cheap, either, of course. Limiting global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial averages could cost nearly US$200 trillion in green investments by 2050, Bloomberg NEF has estimated.
That also sounds pretty inflationary, but in the meantime it will generate economic growth, spur new technologies and industries, and prevent even greater amounts of future death, destruction and — for some of us worst of all — inflation.
Mark Gongloff is a Bloomberg Opinion editor and columnist covering climate change. He previously worked for Fortune.com, the Huffington Post and the Wall Street Journal.
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic