Thick haze blotting out the sun in Singapore and Malaysia is an early warning sign that one of the world’s more ambitious attempts to bend commodity markets to political and environmental imperatives is failing.
The smoke comes from thousands of wildfires burning on the islands of Borneo and Sumatra. The causes of such blazes can be complex, but clearing forest to make way for palm oil has long been rampant in Southeast Asia. A combination of climatic, economic and political circumstances right now in Indonesia, the biggest producer, make conditions unusually favorable for a devastating season. For the EU, which has struggled for years to stamp out unsustainable palm cultivation, that would represent a humiliating setback.
There is already circumstantial evidence that plantations would spread as a result of the recent fire weather. NASA satellite imagery recorded last week shows extensive burns around the city of Banjarbaru in South Kalimantan province on Borneo in areas where native forest abuts stands of oil palm. Claims of progress in halting Indonesian deforestation over the past decade might simply be the result of a run of wet years that made it harder to burn off native vegetation.
That situation has reversed this year. Hot, dry weather has spread across Southeast Asia in recent months thanks to the confluence of El Nino and a positive Indian Ocean dipole, two oceanic climate cycles that parch the region. In such circumstances, even fires started accidentally can build into damaging conflagrations.
Accidents often get a helping hand from human intervention, and economic circumstances right now are certainly favoring that. The price of palm oil closely tracks that of crude oil, thanks to its extensive usage as biodiesel. As a result, Riyadh and Moscow’s push to increase their petroleum export revenues is also making Indonesian palm plantations more profitable.
Jakarta, meanwhile, lifted its blending mandate for domestic gas stations in February so that 35 percent of each liter must come from biofuels, and would move to a 50 percent target for 2025. Indonesia’s palm production is already up more than 10 percent since the 2019-2020 crop year. Price and demand factors suggest it would push higher in the years ahead.
The final factor is politics. Indonesia has been attempting to crack down on deforestation for some time, but enforcement has been patchy at best. According to one 2020 study, that is often due to electoral considerations. Logging and burning tends to be highest in regions that have upcoming local ballots, since governors and officials recognize that cracking down on farmers’ livelihoods is a bad strategy for winning votes.
The coming year could be a bumper one for Indonesian democracy, with a closely fought general election due in February followed by polls for every major local post in November. In a polity riddled with vote-buying, that provides ample opportunities for candidates to turn a blind eye to lucrative land-clearing.
What is to be done about this? The EU, for decades a top-five consumer of palm oil, has tried to crack down on the trade. The fight is vital to preventing tropical deforestation, which caused emissions equivalent to those from India last year. Food-labeling rules were introduced in 2014 and a new anti-deforestation law was passed by Brussels this year, underpinning a promise to phase out palm biodiesel by 2030.
Despite a recent fall in consumption within the EU, there has been little discernible effect at the global level; palm production has more than doubled over the past decade. Most of the additional liters are going to supply burgeoning domestic consumption in Indonesia and, to a lesser extent, Malaysia. Tropical producer countries, meanwhile, regard Brussels’ restrictions as little better than protectionism for Europe’s domestic rapeseed and sunflower industries. A case brought at the WTO might be decided before the end of the year.
What would be a better approach to ending this cycle of deforestation and lax enforcement? German and Spanish subsidies for solar installations in the 2000s played a major part in turning photovoltaic panels into the green success story of the 2010s and 2020s. As grids sucked up renewable power instead, fossil fuel consumption was constrained.
There is a lesson in that. Instead of slowing down the electric vehicle revolution with measures like the probe into Chinese exports announced last month, Brussels should redouble its efforts to accelerate it. As drivers switch away from liquid fuels, long-run demand for palm oil (and the incentive to clear more land) would shrink. That could especially be the case if better local charging infrastructure and more battery-powered two-wheelers can electrify Indonesia’s own roads. Funding to achieve that end would mesh with Jakarta’s ambitions to turn its forests into a carbon sink by 2030 and become a crucial supplier of raw materials for the energy transition.
Europe’s mistake in dealing with palm oil has been the same one that prohibitionists have always made: Attempting to limit supplies, when demand is the real source of the problem. It is time for a different approach.
David Fickling is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering energy and commodities. Previously, he worked for Bloomberg News, the Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The recent passing of Taiwanese actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known to many as “Big S,” due to influenza-induced pneumonia at just 48 years old is a devastating reminder that the flu is not just a seasonal nuisance — it is a serious and potentially fatal illness. Hsu, a beloved actress and cultural icon who shaped the memories of many growing up in Taiwan, should not have died from a preventable disease. Yet her death is part of a larger trend that Taiwan has ignored for too long — our collective underestimation of the flu and our low uptake of the
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
Actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known affectionately as “Big S,” recently passed away from pneumonia caused by the flu. The Mandarin word for the flu — which translates to “epidemic cold” in English — is misleading. Although the flu tends to spread rapidly and shares similar symptoms with the common cold, its name easily leads people to underestimate its dangers and delay seeking medical treatment. The flu is an acute viral respiratory illness, and there are vaccines to prevent its spread and strengthen immunity. This being the case, the Mandarin word for “influenza” used in Taiwan should be renamed from the misleading