It has been as unsurprising as it is grotesque to see Iran’s leaders applaud Hamas’ “victory” even as evidence of atrocities against Israeli women and children mounts. From here on, the outlook becomes much more complicated for Tehran, but so too for Israel and the US.
We still do not know exactly what role Iran played in Saturday’s attack on Israel by Hamas, but there is growing evidence that Tehran’s client at least asked permission, and that means Israeli and US policymakers will have to factor it into their responses.
Iran is no longer as isolated or vulnerable as it once was. The war in Ukraine has shuffled geopolitical alignments and as a result, possibly for the first time since the 1979 revolution, Tehran can count on powerful friends to give it at least diplomatic protection. Its role in providing Moscow with attack drones for its invasion of Ukraine has ensured that.
Andrey Gurulyov, a former Russian military commander and now member of parliament for the ruling United Russia party, said on his Telegram channel on Monday: “We and China will not allow the adoption of an anti-Iranian resolution in the UN Security Council.”
Gurulyov is not in the Kremlin, so he does not make the decisions, but it is unlikely he is wide of the mark. A China-brokered agreement to restore Tehran’s relations with Saudi Arabia has also helped to stabilize that relationship.
The importance of Iran’s oil supply to suppressing prices on the global market, and its potential to disrupt much larger flows through the Strait of Hormuz also offer a measure of leverage, if not protection. At the same time, as many have said already, the process of normalizing relations between Israel and the Arab world had been making progress since the 2020 US-brokered Abrahams accords. A deal adding Saudi Arabia was on the table, even as Israel embarked on a no concessions policy in dealing with Palestinians living in Gaza and the West Bank. All that hit a wall on Saturday — a clear win for Iran.
For Hamas and Iran’s clerical leadership, both dedicated to eradication of Israel, the Jewish state’s regional normalization had been humiliating and called into question their purpose — either as a self-styled strike force for the Palestinian cause or as a revolutionary Islamic republic. The Hamas attack is precisely the kind of ostentatiously disruptive operation Iran has wanted to see for years, and offers a welcome distraction from its many internal problems.
The 1979 revolution is today a gerontocracy. Its battle cries of “Death to Israel’’ and “Death to America’’ no longer resonate with the growing majority of the population that has only known rule by an Islamist dictatorship it despises. Decades of US and then European sanctions have failed to force a change of regime behavior, but they have stunted the development of a potentially vibrant economy.
The urban classes have revolted over liberties, the poor over lack of means and prospects, and women over their brutal repression by the deeply misogynistic cult that runs the country. None of these mass protests have succeeded, because the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) remains ready and willing to kill to protect the regime, yet they have left an out-of-touch leadership insecure.
For the Iranian regime, the main concern is that war with an enraged Israel, fully backed by the force of the US, could, if miscarried, be its last fight, or equally could mark the end of Hezbollah, its proxy force in Lebanon, said John Raine, a Middle East specialist and senior adviser for Geopolitical Due Diligence at the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies. That is why Iran has in recent years tried to avoid a direct conventional war with either.
At the same time, the challenge for the US and Israel is punishing Iran without just expanding the coming conflict’s cost and destruction for themselves. Invading a nation of 88 million that has cut through by mountains and more than 2.5 times the size of Ukraine is not an option. Strikes on the IRGC and its proxy forces outside Iran can have an impact, yet the Iranians need to present sufficient targets to be hit, and might not oblige. Airstrikes within Iran could even do Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei a favor, prompting his domestic opponents to rally against a common foreign threat.
Relatively few ordinary Iranians would relish picking a fight with the US or Israel, but it is worth remembering that Qassem Soleimani, the head of the IRGC al-Quds force who was assassinated by the US in Iraq in 2020, was one of the nation’s most popular figures. Even regime opponents backed the idea of fighting Sunni radicals such as Islamic State abroad, so they would not have to do so at home.
The pressure on both Israel and Iran to expand Operation Iron Sword against Hamas into a regional war is real. However, a wider war is far from inevitable.
Iran’s ultraconservative leadership “will lionize Hamas as this fight goes on, but the time will come when it is under pressure to put its money where its mouth is, because Hamas will have its hat out there for help” Raine said.
In Syria and Iraq, that meant sending IRGC personnel to the front lines, but the stakes in Gaza are much higher. Even Hamas, having made sure Israel would have to attack its stronghold in Gaza, cannot be sure if Iran’s aging Islamist revolutionaries would come to its rescue.
Marc Champion is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Europe, Russia and the Middle East. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
Despite the steady modernization of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the international community is skeptical of its warfare capabilities. Late last month, US think tank RAND Corp published two reports revealing the PLA’s two greatest hurdles: personnel challenges and structural difficulties. The first RAND report, by Jennie W. Wenger, titled Factors Shaping the Future of China’s Military, analyzes the PLA’s obstacles with recruitment, stating that China has long been committed to attracting young talent from top universities to augment the PLA’s modernization needs. However, the plan has two major constraints: demographic changes and the adaptability of the PLA’s military culture.