Early this month, Israeli settlers killed Qosai Mi’tan, a 19-year-old Palestinian from the West Bank village of Burqa. One of the suspects, Elisha Yered, is a right-wing extremist who until recently served as a spokesperson for Limor Son Har-Melech, a lawmaker from the far-right Otzma Yehudit (Jewish Power) party — a key member of Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s governing coalition.
Despite Yered being a murder suspect, the Israeli far-right has rallied behind him. Otzma Yehudit leader Itamar Ben-Gvir, who as minister of national security is in charge of the police investigation into the shooting, lauded the suspects as “heroes.”
The killing of Mi’tan, along with the settler riots in the West Bank village of Hawara in February, highlights the forces driving Netanyahu’s coalition. While international observers often view the government’s emasculation of Israel’s judiciary as Netanyahu’s bid to escape his ongoing corruption trial, his extremist allies are steering the government’s agenda.
Illustration: Mountain People
Netanyahu’s far-right partners openly endorse Jewish supremacy and domestic terrorism. They proudly align themselves with the late rabbi and former Knesset member Meir Kahane, who called for the expulsion of Palestinians from the occupied territories and whose radical proposals were once compared by a prominent member of Likud — Netanyahu’s own party — to the 1935 Nuremberg Laws.
These Jewish supremacists are largely indifferent to Netanyahu’s legal troubles. In their view, Netanyahu is merely a useful idiot helping them to remove the few remaining obstacles to settlement expansion and intensification of military action against Palestinians. Their primary goal is to annex the West Bank.
Many far-right legislators openly express these sentiments. Simcha Rothman, chair of the Knesset’s Constitution, Law and Justice Committee who has played a key role in advancing the judicial coup, is a settler whose home in Pnei Kedem faces potential demolition over illegal construction. Minister of Finance Bezalel Smotrich, who also oversees the Civil Administration, the body governing civilian life in the occupied territories, is also a settler and a lifelong annexation advocate.
In 2017, Smotrich unveiled his so-called “decisive plan” for the full annexation of the West Bank, under which Palestinians would be denied voting rights, and those who object would face deportation. Smotrich acknowledged that his proposal might lead to a “democratic deficit,” but rationalized formal apartheid as a necessary sacrifice.
Not very long ago, these politicians were fringe figures. For years, Otzma Yehudit was a marginal party, unable to win even one parliamentary seat. It was Netanyahu who persuaded the party to form an alliance with Smotrich’s Religious Zionism ahead of last year’s election, enabling the joint list to win 14 seats (out of 120).
However, “fringe” fails to capture the broader context. In reality, there is little (if any) difference between these racist parties’ stances and those of Netanyahu’s Likud. Consider, for example, Israeli Minister of Justice Yariv Levin (Likud), the judicial coup’s architect. Levin has endorsed multiple proposals to “apply sovereignty” — a euphemism for annexation — to the occupied territories. In explaining his eagerness to push the coup, every example he gave concerned maintaining Israeli occupation.
Israel’s autocratic drift is inextricably tied to the occupation. The ongoing judicial coup reflects not just the determination of a power-hungry leader to evade legal scrutiny, but also a settler-driven effort to establish an apartheid regime between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean. And it is the occupation that has also facilitated the meteoric rise of previously peripheral figures such as Ben-Gvir and Smotrich.
Last year’s election is a case in point. Israel was still reeling from the wave of violence between Jews and Arabs that erupted in May 2021. The unrest began with the eviction of Palestinian residents from Sheikh Jarrah in East Jerusalem and quickly escalated into Operation Guardian of the Walls in Gaza, resulting in hundreds of deaths and sparking riots across Israel’s mixed cities. Deeply shocked by the scale of the violence, many Israelis found themselves particularly receptive to Ben-Gvir’s promises to “show the Arabs who is really in charge.”
However, Ben-Gvir’s rhetoric also resonated because “conflict management” has long been Israel’s preferred national-security approach. According to this logic, given that peace with the Palestinians is unattainable, maintaining the status quo is Israel’s best option. For years, Israelis were indifferent to this strategic shift away from the peace process, largely because it was the Palestinians who bore the brunt of it. However, trying to manage a conflict is like trying to manage a wildfire; when the winds shift, the flames turn toward you.
That is precisely what happened in May 2021. Since most of Israel’s opposition parties had come to avoid even acknowledging the Palestinians’ existence, the only solutions on the table were those offered by the far right. While Smotrich’s apartheid plan is childish, dangerous and abhorrent, it provided Israelis with something most of the political establishment had ceased to offer: a potential solution.
For decades, Israel has tried to manage the conflict, only to be managed by it. Just as they learned to turn a blind eye to the horrors of occupation, many Israelis regarded Ben-Gvir as a mere provocateur, overlooking the dangerous implications of his Kahanist beliefs and admiration for figures like the Jewish terrorist and mass murderer Baruch Goldstein.
This is why the opposition to the Netanyahu-Ben-Gvir-Smotrich alliance must offer a coherent vision for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Any political alternative — whether it originates from the Knesset, the massive pro-democracy protests that engulf Israel every Saturday, or the international community — must address the consequences of Israel’s decades-long policies in the occupied territories.
As pro-occupation leaders become increasingly candid about its objectives, their opponents must articulate a clear strategy for the West Bank’s illegal settlements and outposts — the epicenters of Jewish fascism — and the thousands of soldiers on the ground sent to uphold military law on a civilian population. Our strategy must, first and foremost, strive to end the occupation. As long as Israel insists on maintaining a military dictatorship in the West Bank, genuine democracy would be impossible.
Avner Gvaryahu is executive director of Breaking the Silence.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS