There are 318,282 people in Taiwan registered as nursing professionals, but only 186,458 are practicing nurses — which means a ratio of 58.6 percent — according to the data of the Taiwan Union of Nurses Association (TUNA). The low ratio shows that there are enough nursing professionals in Taiwan, but there is a need for more of the registered nurses to become practicing ones.
In the past six months, as many as 1,726 nurses have quit their jobs. Aside from low salaries and long work hours, there were also protests against health agencies that were withholding COVID-19 subsidies of late. Further, violence against healthcare professionals has put people off the job.
The nursing shortage should be taken seriously. A lack of nursing professionals could lead to dysfunctional hospitals, and people who need medical care would become victims. In response, TUNA has called on the government to improve the nurse-to-patient ratio, provide scholarship and tuition subsidies for nursing students and allow male nurses to carry out substitute military service at hospitals.
In fact, according to current guidelines for substitute military service, male conscripts who hold nursing licenses have the right of priority to carry out substitute service at the National Fire Agency or the Ministry of Health and Welfare’s Social and Family Affairs Administration. Unfortunately, as cross-strait tensions are at their highest in decades, the government has announced that starting from Jan. 1 next year, conscripts born in or after 2005 would undergo more intense combat training in boot camp, while military service is to be extended to one year. As the government has revoked all qualifications and screening orders for substitute service applications except for religious or family factors, the number of substitute service draftees would definitely see a massive slump.
As a result, TUNA’s proposal for male nurses to carry out substitute service in hospitals seems out of the question while drafting a specific act to allow male nurses to do so would violate the principle of equality.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said she would be glad to see women participating in national defense affairs, media reports said.
“If, during a state of defense, the need for civilian services in the civilian health system or in stationary military hospitals cannot be met on a voluntary basis, women between the age of 18 and 55 may be called upon to render such services by or pursuant to a law. Under no circumstances may they be required to render service involving the use of arms,” says Paragraph 4 of Article 12a (compulsory military and alternative civilian service) in the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany.
Due to the plummeting fertility rate, there would soon be fewer substitute service draftees to carry out disaster relief, healthcare duties and rescue missions in Taiwan. To address this, perhaps Taiwan can take a page from the German constitution and amend legislation to allow women of conscription age to carry out substitute service through practicing civil medical services and health duties.
The government should also reinforce the legal system and related guidelines for governing the occupational safety of healthcare practitioners. Amendments to the Health Care Act (醫療法) and conscription guidelines require cooperation across sectors.
It is high time that government divisions come together to address nursing shortage so that all Taiwanese, regardless of gender, can play a role in defending their homeland.
Chao Hsuey-wen is an assistant professor and holds a doctorate in law from Fu Jen Catholic University.
Translated by Rita Wang
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged