Twisted sections of a reactor unit remain exposed at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Japan and a crushed metal tank lies near the coastline, reminders of one of the world’s worst atomic disasters in 2011 and a response that has already cost about ￥12 trillion (US$83 billion).
Huge cranes are stationed across the site of Tokyo Electric Power Co.’s (TEPCOF) wrecked facility, while some areas have been covered with giant dome-like structures as work continues to manage the removal of dangerous fuel debris.
One of the most critical components of the current stage of decommissioning is much less obvious, a 10cm-wide pipe that funnels wastewater, in part generated as the stricken reactors are cooled, through a treatment process that will lead into the Pacific Ocean.
No element of Japan’s work to manage the risks from the disaster has been more contentious than its decision to start yesterday discharging into the sea more than 1 million m3 of treated radioactive water — enough to fill 500 Olympic-size swimming pools — that is stored in about 1,000 tanks.
Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida on Tuesday confirmed the process was to start yesterday after a meeting of a Cabinet panel.
“If there are no issues with the weather and sea conditions, we expect the discharge to begin,” Kishida said. “The Japanese government will take responsibility to make sure the proposal is carried out safely, even if it takes decades until all of the treated water is discharged.”
PROTESTS
China has vociferously opposed the move, while Japanese companies including cosmetics brands have faced consumer boycotts. Restaurants in Hong Kong are already hurriedly seeking alternatives for the supply of some ingredients previously sourced from parts of Japan.
The ocean is “not Japan’s private sewer,” Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Wang Wenbin (汪文斌) said in June.
Public protests have taken place in South Korea, despite the government’s backing of Japan’s strategy.
Any problems would have “an impact not just on our three countries, but all countries around the world,” South Korean President Yoon Suk-Yeol said on Friday last week at Camp David in Maryland, after holding talks with Kishida and US President Joe Biden.
Releasing the vast volumes of water is necessary as storage tanks are forecast to hit capacity early next year, and because the full decommissioning of the site does not allow for more giant storage vessels to be added. Discharges of cooling water from nuclear plants are also common practice across the industry.
“Controlled, gradual discharges of the treated water” into the Pacific Ocean “would have a negligible radiological impact on people and the environment,” the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said last month, offering approval for Japan’s proposal after a two-year safety review.
Radiation levels at Fukushima have fallen over the past decade to the point that regular visitors are no longer required to wear full-body protective suits. Guests must still carry a dosimeter, and cover up with long sleeves, goggles, masks and gloves. TEPCO also asks those accessing the site to undergo scans to check bodily radiation before and after their visit.
A tour of the facility held last month was part of TEPCO’s efforts to respond to concerns about the planned releases by presenting evidence, said Junichi Matsumoto, the company’s chief officer for the advanced liquid processing system water management.
“We are aware that there are people with a variety of opinions about this plan,” he said.
The process to be used over the next 30 years or so to release batches of the treated water about 1km off the coast breaks down into four basic steps:measurement and confirmation, transfer, dilution and discharge.
Water is pumped into the facility and used to cool the damaged reactors. About 130m3 of liquid — which also includes rain and groundwater — becomes contaminated each day after contact with nuclear fuel debris. It is pumped out and processed through the advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, which uses a series of chemical reactions to lower concentrations of 62 radionuclides.
TRITIUM SAFETY
That process cannot remove tritium, a weakly radioactive form of hydrogen. Though it can be carcinogenic at high levels, a human would need to ingest billions of units of becquerels — a measure for radioactivity — before seeing any health effects. Water released by TEPCO will have a concentration of less than 1,500 becquerels per liter.
After the initial treatment, a first series of measurements of radionuclide levels are taken before the water is moved on to vessels where it is mixed and circulated for 144 hours. Independent analysis company Kaken Co and the Japan Atomic Energy Agency will then begin a further testing process that can last about two months.
China has complained that the IAEA did not evaluate the long-term effectiveness of Japan’s purification equipment, and has argued that waste from a nuclear accident — rather than from the usual operation of a power plant — has not previously been handled in this manner.
“We hope that the public can be reassured by the fact that it takes a long time” for the treated water to clear protocols, Kenichi Takahara, a Fukushima-based risk communicator for TEPCO, told reporters during last month’s visit.
The process is also deliberately slow, because TEPCO is capable of releasing at most about 500m3 of treated water per day — a fraction of the 510,000m3 of seawater brought into the facility every 24 hours.
At the dilution sector of the facility, three large pumps pull in seawater that is combined with the treated liquid to ensure the tritium concentration is “well below” guidelines set by Japan’s government and the WHO, according to TEPCO. By the time the process is completed, the treated water will have been diluted more than 350 times, TEPCO calculates.
That diluted liquid then moves into a partially underground tank for further sampling. In the next steps, water flows through a deeper vessel and then along the discharge tunnel — which runs for 1km under the seabed. A spout built roughly 12m below the sea surface will flush the water out into the Pacific.
For Kishida, who is already struggling with waning popularity, placating domestic and international concerns about the process is crucial, particularly as Japan also seeks to bolster energy security by reviving the nation’s nuclear sector.
“The Japanese government, including myself, will continue to provide highly transparent explanations and information,” he said on Sunday during a visit to Fukushima.
He said his aim is to use “every opportunity to promote understanding, not only in China but also in the international community.”
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS