On tuesday last week President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) expressed her concern and sympathy via a post on social media platform X to those affected by serious flooding in northern China in the wake of Typhoon Doksuri. Later, the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) leadership, the Mainland Affairs Council and the Straits Exchange Foundation also offered their sympathy to people affected by the disaster.
The next day, the Presidential Office announced that it would be glad to provide assistance to the Chinese side. This series of warm words was a collective political action based on a consensus, and thus attracted much attention.
In recent years, cross-strait relations have been frozen due to China’s military threats, and a warm greeting is rare. Why did Tsai take the initiative to display humanitarianism this time? The greeting, which was on the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Army Day” (建軍節), during which, as expected, Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) administration showed off its military strength, drew a sharp contrast between Taiwan and China.
Starting on the morning of Tuesday last week, the PLA sent 10 warships and five warplanes to harass the waters and airspace around Taiwan, and all the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) mouthpieces also broadcast a propaganda video for the 96th anniversary of the founding of the PLA. The propaganda video featured a special report on the remarks made by Xi — who is chairman of the CCP’s Central Military Commission — to the PLA Air Force during his visit to China’s western war zone on July 26, when he told the PLA to promote the modernization of the military, overall combat capabilities and leaders’ ability in war preparation. While Chinese were flooded, the elite of the CCP continued to talk prominently to the world, displaying a hostile attitude.
After Tsai sent her greeting in simplified Chinese characters to the Chinese side, the DPP government quickly followed her.
First, such goodwill might cool hostility, as Tsai took concrete actions to ease tensions and help foster peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, with the expectation that this would boost the legitimacy of democratic Taiwan.
Second, this is also a chance for Taiwan to show the world how it deals with Chinese hostility in a civilized way and under pressure, proving that US and global military aid is necessary, while trying to gain the right to speak internationally.
Third, Taiwan is amid a fierce presidential campaign. Faced with the China-US confrontation, how exactly the ruling party can flexibly handle the essential contradictions between Taiwan and China is a matter of survival for the DPP, which is responsible for convincing voters with its appeals.
Therefore, after Typhoon Doksuri passed by Taiwan and hit China, causing a catastrophe along its coastal areas from the south to the north, the government offered an olive branch to send a political signal to Xi’s regime.
In the second half of this year, China must attend to quite a few political events rationally.
During this month, Vice President and DPP Chairman William Lai (賴清德) is set to stop over in New York and San Francisco.
In November, the APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting is expected to be held in the US, and the question of who is to serve as Tsai’s envoy is being closely watched by China. If Beijing insists that power speaks louder than everything, at least Taiwan has shown it courtesy before resorting to power.
Tzou Jiing-wen is editor-in-chief of the Liberty Times (the sister newspaper of the Taipei Times).
Translated by Eddy Chang
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
The Central Election Commission (CEC) on Friday announced that recall motions targeting 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) have been approved, and that a recall vote would take place on July 26. Of the recall motions against 35 KMT legislators, 31 were reviewed by the CEC after they exceeded the second-phase signature thresholds. Twenty-four were approved, five were asked to submit additional signatures to make up for invalid ones and two are still being reviewed. The mass recall vote targeting so many lawmakers at once is unprecedented in Taiwan’s political history. If the KMT loses more
Taiwan’s unconditional support “for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India to safeguard national security and fight terrorist forces that cross borders to attack innocent civilians” marked a monumental shift in the relationship between Taipei and New Delhi. At a time when the Indian government sent several delegations of parliament members to convey to the rest of the world Pakistan’s role in sponsoring terrorism against India, Taiwan became one of the few nations that unequivocally supported India’s military operation, “Sindhoor.” Sure, this change in bilateral ties did not happen in a vacuum. Over the past decade,