As the Dragon Boat Festival approaches, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office spokeswoman Zhu Fenglian (朱鳳蓮) told the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that attempts to “tilt to the US to seek Taiwanese independence” would damage the Chinese nation’s interests, a shameless proclivity to “sell out” Taiwan.
She then put on a different tone and wished viewers a happy festival in Mandarin, Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese) and Hakka, asking them if they prefer sweet or meat rice dumplings, even adding that the flavor debate is a manifestation of “homesickness.”
Even with a simple festival greeting, Zhu did not pass up the opportunity to link culture to politics, and to use national identity to embed pro-unification propaganda, that “countering China” means “selling out Taiwan.”
At the eye-dotting ceremony of this year’s New Taipei City Dragon Boat Race Championship on May 30, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said that the Dragon Boat Festival is a shared custom celebrated by people across the Taiwan Strait. Using a festival that connects China and Taiwan, Hou hopes to unite people with dragon boat races.
However, the holiday is also celebrated in South Korea and Japan, so why has neither nation has ever used the holiday to express sentiments of “uniting with China”? To cozy up to a nation bent on annexing Taiwan, Hou is adding fodder to China’s cultural unification agenda by diminishing the “us vs them” distinctions in the minds of Taiwanese.
When Chinese poet and politician Qu Yuan (屈原) committed suicide by drowning himself in the Miluo River in ancient times, his death became a cultural code that rulers capitalize on for symbols of patriotism and loyalty. As a democratic country thriving in the 21st century, it is high time that Taiwan shakes off this kind of “colonial imprint” given by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) when it retreated to Taiwan.
As the Dragon Boat Festival became a social custom, it was endowed with new cultural meanings in different societies. In Japan, the holiday was called Tango no Sekku, a day that ancient Japanese celebrated by purifying their homes by thatching the roof with irises, believed to be effective in repelling evil spirits.
As the holiday reiterates the idea of warding off evil to make way for a new beginning, the solidarity that dragon boat racing represents should not only buttress the idea of Taiwanese subjectivity, but also to highlight that Taiwanese are in the same “boat” and share the goal of countering a common enemy.
Pro-China supporters who are busy playing to Beijing’s tune have overlooked that the holiday actually has connections closer to home. Perhaps the pro-Taiwan DPP government can start using examples of Taiwanese martyrs in place of Qu Yuan and the attendant pro-unification propaganda, and offer Taiwanese a local interpretation that taps into Taiwanese culture.
The Ministry of Culture could introduce a Taiwanese martyr at every Dragon Boat Festival. For example, it can introduce Tang Te-chang (湯德章) — a half-Japanese who fought for the people of Taiwan and met his end in the aftermath of the 228 Incident — to honor his passion for the country and his love of Taiwanese, thereby endowing the festival with a new meaning.
Reinforcing the national identity of Taiwanese is an arduous task that the government has to face, but it is also a question that every person living in Taiwan’s diverse society has to ask themselves. When cultural identity has been appropriated as political identity, Taiwan’s sovereignty and subjectivity would be in further jeopardy when its people start losing their Taiwanese self and identity.
Chu Meng-hsiang is a counselor at the Lee Teng-hui Association for Democracy.
Translated by Rita Wang
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
Since the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has taken Taiwanese students to visit China and invited Chinese students to Taiwan. Ma calls those activities “cross-strait exchanges,” yet the trips completely avoid topics prohibited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), such as democracy, freedom and human rights — all of which are universal values. During the foundation’s most recent Chinese student tour group, a Fudan University student used terms such as “China, Taipei” and “the motherland” when discussing Taiwan’s recent baseball victory. The group’s visit to Zhongshan Girls’ High School also received prominent coverage in
India and China have taken a significant step toward disengagement of their military troops after reaching an agreement on the long-standing disputes in the Galwan Valley. For government officials and policy experts, this move is welcome, signaling the potential resolution of the enduring border issues between the two countries. However, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of this disengagement on India’s relationship with Taiwan. Over the past few years, there have been important developments in India-Taiwan relations, including exchanges between heads of state soon after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s third electoral victory. This raises the pressing question: