Teaching social justice
When a class at Taichung Municipal Taichung First Senior High School caused controversy recently for naming a booth at the school fair “Hsi Huan Na” (烯環鈉) — which sounds like “indigenous bastard” (死番仔) in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese) — I reminded my son, who is in senior-high school, to pay attention to words and deeds that could be seen as racist or discriminatory. He replied indifferently, saying: “Big deal. Was it that serious? You guys thought it was discriminatory because you overthought it, and you are so sensitive and protective of certain ethnic groups.”
Later, the offensive proposals by two candidates running for president and vice president of the student council at National Taiwan University’s economics department caused another controversy. This time, I collected in-depth articles about the issue from experts and academics, hoping to get my son to take the matter seriously.
To my surprise, he still replied with “big deal,” adding: “It is obvious that the content on the department’s election bulletin is impossible to implement anyway, so we will talk about it when the two candidates are really elected. If they are elected and their policies are implemented, then there is a real problem.”
I pursued the matter.
“How could they propose policies in the bulletin that were not only absurd, but also discriminatory and disrespectful?” I asked.
“Well, isn’t that freedom of speech? Candidates have the right to express their views freely, as long as there are no specific personal attacks,” he said. “Besides, I’ve seen such discriminatory policies in Taiwan’s election bulletins.”
He quickly found a news report on his cellphone about a candidate’s policies, such as a husband must buy his wife a Hermes bag if he does not have sex with her, and provide proper training for parents-in-law to become quiet and polite.
“Don’t such policies discriminate against men and disrespect the elderly? Why can they be published without being banned?” he said.
I was more shocked by what he said next.
“The policy of protecting the disadvantaged in society mitigates the unfair treatment they received in the past. However, we have been taught from childhood that all people are equal, and this is the mindset with which we face the world,” he said. “Since everyone is generally regarded as equal in society today, why should anyone be given special protection in Taiwan — such as extra points for indigenous students in certain examinations or reserved seats for female candidates in certain elections?”
“There are some individuals from unprotected groups who are more disadvantaged than those from protected groups,” he added. “What should they do? Does this mean that the protected groups need to be discriminated against to enjoy such special protection? The students’ attempts at humor were simply a reaction against political correctness.”
I was shocked, perhaps because those words seemed cold and even heartless, but they also showed deep empathy with the angry students who were condemned by the public, while reflecting the possible blind spots of social justice.
The argument of a senior-high school student made me, as a mother, think about it for a long time. I also hope that while society teaches and punishes the students for discrimination, someone can try to have a deep dialogue with them.
Hsieh Hsin-chien
Chiayi
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Taiwan’s economic momentum, driven by demand for artificial intelligence (AI) products, remains strong, with booming demand for advanced semiconductors, servers and key components. In the first quarter, GDP expanded 14.55 percent year-on-year, the second consecutive quarter of double-digit percentage growth and accelerating from the 12.95 percent expansion in the previous quarter, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) reported on Friday. Net exports remained the dominant driver of growth, contributing 10.33 percentage points to Taiwan’s GDP growth in the first quarter. That came as exports rose 35.76 percent year-on-year in the first quarter, outpacing 26.34 percent growth in imports, the
RSS