As we embark on a new year, I have been reflecting on “resolutions,” and more specifically, what it takes for an individual or a society to be resolute in a world of endless challenges and obstacles. Throughout my career, I have seen many examples of triumph against the odds — extraordinary accomplishments that often begin with a small group of individuals seeking to solve a problem. In the best cases, local communities, government and the private sector align and invest in programs and policies that create more opportunities for these groups to flourish.
The extraordinary success of women’s self-help groups in India represents one of the best-case outcomes. Established by women determined to build a brighter future for themselves and their families, these groups have thrived, thanks to innovative financial and infrastructure support from the Indian government. With more than 80 million women participating in 7.5 million such groups, India is fostering the world’s largest community development program, which is now a key component of its economy.
Women, especially in rural areas, face gender-based barriers to participating fully in their communities and building a livelihood: Many, unable to open a bank account or access credit, are dependent on informal loans from relatives, friends or money lenders. Moreover, traditional family structures and social norms might constrain women from engaging in activities necessary to start or expand a small business.
Self-help groups were first formed in the mid-1980s to address these barriers by providing access to savings and credit so that women could earn a livelihood and lift themselves and their families out of poverty. The results speak for themselves: Women’s self-help groups have contributed to India’s extraordinarily sharp reduction in poverty, from 55.1 percent to 16.4 percent (415 million people) over the past 15 years.
Initially, new groups were dependent on members, although often impoverished, pooling what little money they had to get started. The Indian government stepped in to alleviate this hardship by providing unsecured loans without the need for a formal, registered business entity.
Importantly, these loans are offered at a very competitive interest rate of 12 percent, which drops to 7 percent if a group repays its loans within 30 days of the due date. With this support, the average self-help group was able to borrow about 200,000 rupees (about US$2,500) each, and in 2021, the limit for collateral-free loans was increased from US$10,000 to US$25,000.
Over the past decade, more than US$60 billion has been made available to self-help groups in India and, cumulatively, women in these groups have saved an estimated US$6 billion. Access to low-interest loans continues to help an increasing number of women create sustainable sources of income, accumulate assets and savings, and build financial security. Moreover, individual group members are building more than their financial skills; they are also raising their self-confidence and influence within the community.
For example, a self-help group in Chak Singar Barari village in the state of Bihar was able to structure their enterprise so that each member is sent home with 3,000 to 4,000 rupees a month. And each woman has her own story: Sunila Devi enrolled her children in private schools, Chitrekha Devi is working toward a bachelor’s degree and Pushpa Devi has started her own ambitious business renting mobile sound systems, which allows her to employ others.
Now multiply those stories by millions, and you can begin to grasp the full effects of these groups. As each woman contributes more to the household income, she gains more say in household decisions. Collectively, they show what is possible when one of the most essential challenges to gender equality — increasing women’s economic power — is addressed.
Ultimately, increasing a woman’s economic power bolsters her personal agency and empowers her to play a greater role in her family and in her community. India’s government-supported self-help groups demonstrate the transformative effects of policy initiatives that are designed to meet the needs of marginalized women.
The task now is to replicate this success.
The goals should be clear: To make credit accessible and affordable, build women’s financial skills and credit history, and strengthen their financial security. Additionally, the various players must be resolute in their support.
The closer one looks at the details of the self-help groups in India, the more one sees the dedication it took from all stakeholders — across economic sectors, states and organized interest groups — to bring together the people, resources and tools needed to succeed at this scale. Government agencies at both the federal and state levels were involved, along with banks and other financial institutions, researchers, and an extensive network of non-government and voluntary organization partners working at the grassroots level in communities across India.
This formula of determination, collaboration and political will can be applied to other stubborn barriers to gender equality. One of the more persistent challenges I hear from women, most recently during a visit to Dakar, is that entrepreneurs also need business development services, skills-building, and access to markets and value chains. India’s program shows that this is feasible: Currently, about 20 percent of self-help group members have these additional supports, and efforts are under way to promote women-owned cooperatives and businesses.
Everyone deserves the chance to live a healthy and productive life. My resolution for this year is to remain inspired by the determined efforts of individuals and by our collective capacity — as India’s self-help groups’ remarkable success have demonstrated — to innovate as we strive for a healthier, happier, more equitable world.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
RSS