Having served as a military officer for 30 years, I would like to respond to the article “Military training and phone security” published on page 8 of the Taipei Times yesterday.
The author of the article begins with how the Ukrainian military was able to use the cellphone signals of Russian soldiers to pinpoint their location and launch missiles to kill them, and then moves on to discuss issues such as the recent leak of sex videos filmed by a couple in the military, the need for soldiers to learn about cyberattacks, cognitive warfare and fifth-generation warfare, and the US-China tensions resulting from the Chinese surveillance balloon controversy.
The author continues, saying that military officers need to train soldiers in a modern way and broaden their world views, and concludes that providing instruction on cellphone use to protect military intelligence and maintaining discipline to avoid damaging the military’s reputation are but two minor examples.
However, the devil is in the details. In theory and in practice, officers are the backbone of the military, and non-commissioned officers and soldiers receive orders from them to complete preparation duties and exercises. Therefore, officers are leaders and commanders.
Before I was discharged from the military, I taught a course on constitutional government and national defense at the National Defense University’s War College. I would use the early research of US political scientist Samuel P. Huntington, on the nationalization of the military and the concept of military professionalism from his book The Soldier and the State.
Huntington wrote that the modern military officer is a professional, as they need to have special military knowledge and expertise, a sense of social responsibility and strictly adhere to group consciousness, or “corporateness.”
In times of war, an officer is expected to display specialized knowledge in the management of violence, and their responsibilities include organizing, equipping and training troops, as well as planning military operations and directing the course of battle.
The professionalization of the officer is built upon a military education, and every cadet requires a resolve that they have what it takes to become a military professional. The officers who lead these cadets also need to assess whether they possess the criteria and discipline that a military professional requires, and if any of these qualities are deemed lacking, they must reinforce them, or their trainees will be unable to educate and lead later generations.
In addition, military officers must make every effort to serve as an example for non-commissioned officers and soldiers. If they are involved in leaks, espionage, corruption or inappropriate relations with another member of the military, however minor, non-commissioned officers and soldiers would still question the officer’s professionalism, and the hierarchical structure of command would be affected. If the media manipulated this conduct, it would also mean that the public would begin to doubt whether the nation’s armed forces are fit for purpose.
The Chinese communists jump on any negative news concerning the Republic of China (ROC) military, and would use it as propaganda for their own forces, giving the People’s Liberation Army a reason to deride the ROC armed forces.
Irrespective of whether certain issues are born of individual failings or moral defects, the influence of poor conduct on the military’s capabilities is considerable. The level of damage is comparable to a lack of military professionalism, and should be regarded with the same degree of seriousness.
Chang Ling-ling is a colonel in the armed forces reserves.
Translated by Paul Cooper
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective
RSS