President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) spoke with Czech president-elect Petr Pavel by telephone on Monday in what is being regarded as a diplomatic coup for Taipei. Taiwan and the Czech Republic do not have formal relations; dialogue between a president and a president-elect is therefore significant.
That it happened at all inevitably led to comparisons with the Dec. 2, 2016, phone call between then-US president-elect Donald Trump and Tsai. At the time, many commentators assumed that Trump taking the congratulatory call was a stroke of luck for Tsai, and that he had accepted it either because of his political naivete and ignorance or his maverick nature. One writer referred to it as an “accident.”
Former representative to the US Stanley Kao (高碩泰) has said that the call was no accident, but the result of a year of preparation by the staff of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the US.
The first ever direct interaction between a US president — or president-elect — and the president of Taiwan since 1979 was, indeed, a diplomatic coup, and needless to say, Beijing was not happy about it. Trump’s subsequent assertive policies toward China suggest he was aware of the significance of the call.
The Tsai-Pavel call might not be considered as significant or important as its Tsai-Trump precursor, due to the strong ties between Taiwan and the US — especially under the Democratic Progressive Party — until it is seen in the context of a growing trend among countries to support Taipei and reject blind obedience to Beijing’s “one China” principle.
Pavel promises to be far more willing to align with the West and democratic countries than Czech President Milos Zeman, who, until the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February last year, had promoted friendly ties with Russia and China. The EU has recently been more vocally pro-Taiwan, but it is notable that Pavel’s direct contact with Tsai is a first for the head of a European nation.
Tuesday saw a number of interesting responses to China’s objections to the Tsai-Pavel call and how it contravenes Beijing’s “one China” principle. China has a restrictive definition of this principle and routinely fails to clarify the difference between it and the “one China” policies that other countries ascribe to.
Pavel said that the Czech Republic is a sovereign nation and can do what it believes to be right; Czech Prime Minister Petr Fiala said that the country can maintain its “one China” policy while having good relations with Taiwan; and EU Foreign Affairs and Security Policy spokesperson Nabila Massrali said that member states are free to maintain a good relationship with Taiwan while observing the bloc’s “one China” policy.
Members of the international community are increasingly willing to push back against Beijing’s insistence on adherence to its strict definition of the “one China” principle, and are clarifying the distinction between Beijing’s principle and their own individual “one China” policies, which allow for them to maintain ties with Taiwan.
During the call on Monday, Pavel expressed an interest in boosting cooperation with Taiwan in all aspects; significantly, he also said that Prague’s “one China” policy should be supplemented with a “two system” principle that would allow significant flexibility in dealing with Beijing and Taipei at the same time, with no implicit conflict.
Pavel’s further articulation of a “two system” principle is an interesting development, one more step away from the formula unilaterally prescribed by China. It is one that the government should encourage other countries to develop.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.