It is a rather mixed message. No sooner have we given birth to a new female beauty trend than we line up to make fun of those stupid enough to follow it. You might have heard of the new craze for buccal fat removal, where a surgeon cuts out a glob of your cheek to give you sharper cheekbones.
Chrissy Teigen is the only celebrity known to have “admitted” to the procedure, but already there is widespread mockery of famous women hollow-cheeked enough to raise our suspicions.
Yes, you heard me. Buccal fat removal is in, but also very much out.
Illustration: Mountain People
This push and pull is familiar. Large breasts were once in fashion, but there was a simultaneous trend for disdaining women who went and got some, as well as for the naturally “endowed.” (Who could take them seriously? Certainly not Michael Parkinson, who, in a famous interview with Helen Mirren, asked her if her “equipment” made her an “unserious actress.”)
In Hollywood, facelifts are still practically demanded of older actresses, but beware the “insecure victims” who get them done.
“She’s looking remarkably fresh-faced,” tabloids tut meaningfully, or perhaps put the message more directly: “What on earth has she done to her face?”
They tend not to dwell on the howling absence in the Hollywood lineup: older women who have not done things to their faces.
Now, lip implants are in vogue among young Instagram stars, but they are at the same time viewed as somehow immoral and low status — those who dissolve their fillers and post videos about “self-esteem” are met with much praise. Girls with fillers look fashionable, but also risk seeming insecure — someone without the “inner confidence” online beauty culture is now supposed to be all about. Win the beauty race and lose another.
What is true for starlets is true for ordinary women, too. Male attractiveness is always entirely compatible with respect and power — “sexiest men” rankings mostly show the candidates in suits, as if on the way to a corner office. Women must choose. Seductive makeup, tight clothing, low cuts — all the ways a woman is shown to enhance her attractiveness — happen also to be exactly the things likely not to get her that second job interview.
Hotness or respect? Beauty culture is clear on the matter: Women cannot have both.
Yes, women cannot win. The phrase is almost soothing in its familiarity, so much so that we might forget to ask: “But why can women not win?”
What, after all, is to stop a culture of female beauty that is also compatible with respect and power, like the male version? What is beauty culture for, anyway?
Well, the narrative goes, there is an element of biological inevitability to it. Men are “wired” to value female good looks as a sign of health and fertility — and that is why societies prize female beauty so highly. If that were really true, why would the ideal woman look so different from year to year?
In the past three decades in the UK, the celebrated beauty has veered wildly from stick thin to voluptuous, from large breasted to small, from neat mouthed to large lipped. It seems like only yesterday that bottoms were out (“Does my butt look big in this?” women would ask in the early 2000s). Now they are very much in.
That is not to mention the way female beauty standards vary between cultures. In Mauritania, young girls are brutally force-fed a diet of up to 16,000 calories a day, to get them obese enough for marriage, but what makes girls beautiful in Mauritania would make them ugly in many other cultures.
In Ethiopia, a hugely stretched lower lip denotes female beauty. Not elsewhere. By contrast, ideals of male beauty are relatively consistent across cultures and timespans: young, fit, muscular.
These trends in female beauty cannot all be about fertility and health, otherwise would not all nations favor about the same robust type, a woman who looks strong enough to give birth to 10 children? Where would “size zero” culture, which had the effect in some women of stopping their periods, fit? What does foot binding, the ancient Chinese beauty practice, have to do with fertility? Could beauty culture — mutilated, starved and anxious women in its wake — in fact be about something else altogether?
Well, viewed in the round, beauty culture starts to look nothing short of abusive. It asks women to harm themselves for its pleasure, and then changes its mind — it wants them to harm themselves differently. It requests women appear a certain way, and then mocks them for trying so hard to please. It demands impossible things.
Perhaps we should consider the possibility that female insecurity is not an unfortunate side effect of beauty culture, but an end goal. Perhaps starved, anxious and humiliated women are that much easier to push around.
That was the contention of Naomi Wolf’s Beauty Myth, which had its flaws, but it got much right. Impossible standards are there to wear women down, physically and psychologically, which makes them easier to control, she wrote. Women cannot win because that is the point.
Martha Gill is a political journalist and former lobby correspondent.
As it has striven toward superiority in most measures of the Asian military balance, China is now ready to challenge the undersea balance of power, long dominated by the United States, a decisive advantage crucial to its ability to deter blockade and invasion of Taiwan by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). America expended enormous treasure to develop the technology, logistics, training, and personnel to emerge victorious in the Cold War undersea struggle against the former Soviet Union, and to remain superior today; the US is not used to considering the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN)
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
RSS