The Philippines has expressed concerns over Chinese activity in the South China Sea, including development of new infrastructure on features in the Spratly Islands (Nansha Islands, 南沙群島) and alleged aggression toward Philippine vessels, Agence France-Presse (AFP) reported on Thursday.
Bloomberg earlier reported that new infrastructure had been photographed on four features, which have been militarized with radar systems and airstrips.
Chinese vessels had also reportedly been swarming “in Iroquois Reef in the Reed Bank [Lile Bank, 禮樂灘] and Sabina Shoal [Sianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗吵], which Manila claims as its territory,” AFP reported.
In 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration ruled that Mischief Reef (Meiji Reef, 美濟礁), which China occupies and has militarized, is a low-tide feature within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone and that China’s occupation of the reef is unlawful. However, China has ignored the ruling while harassing Philippine fishers and researchers.
In November last year, China Coast Guard vessels deployed a water cannon to repel Philippine supply boats heading to a reef where Philippine military personnel were stationed. In March, Chinese vessels reportedly sailed excessively close to Philippine Coast Guard vessels operating near the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島) in the Macclesfield Bank (Zhongsha Islands, 中沙群島), constraining “the maneuvering space of BRP Malabrigo — a clear violation of the 1972 International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea,” the Philippine Coast Guard said in a statement.
China Coast Guard vessels in March also shadowed the Taiwanese research vessel R/V Legend while it was conducting research with Philippine scientists off the northwest coast of the Philippines.
The Chinese actions threaten regional peace and stability, and Beijing becomes bolder every time it gets away with such harassment.
The 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty between Washington and Manila stipulates that the two nations must come to each other’s aid in the event that one is attacked. Use of water cannons on Philippine vessels, intrusion into Manila’s economic zone and unlawful obstruction of vessels could be considered attacks on the Philippines.
Obviously, the US would want to avoid escalating tensions in the South China Sea, but it is imperative that Taiwan — which also claims the Spratlys and the Macclesfield Bank — the US, the Philippines and other Indo-Pacific nations that have claims in the area recognize that there is no “status quo” in the South China Sea or in ties with China, which is expanding and will do so until it is stopped.
These countries should cooperate to protect one another’s claims and prevent further encroachment by China. The US should increase its naval presence in the area and consider operating joint naval bases with the Philippines and Vietnam. Such cooperation need not recognize any territorial claims, but be done to protect shared economic and security interests.
Taiwan’s Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島) would be a good place for such cooperative efforts to start, given US interest in supporting Taiwan’s defense. Through US assistance, facilities on the island could be expanded to accommodate larger vessels and a larger contingent of military personnel. Also, through US mediation, Taiwan could cooperate with Vietnamese forces stationed at nearby Sandy Cay (Duncian Shajou, 敦謙沙洲), where Reuters last week reported that Vietnam is expanding its presence.
Plans take time, but Taiwan, the US and other like-minded countries must act soon to defend international interests in the South China Sea. If not, China will only embed itself more deeply in the area, affecting other nations’ lawful economic activity and threatening their national security interests.
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has