When it comes to China’s attitude toward the free world, Hong Kong has long been considered a canary in the coal mine. The Chinese government’s treatment of the territory is a good indicator of how the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) might engage with non-totalitarian countries. How Western governments respond to China’s recent actions could also be a reliable measure of the vitality and sustainability of liberal democracy as a model of governance.
As Hong Kong increasingly targets dissidents and shreds the freedoms that once defined it, a small chorus of quislings could pretend that nothing has changed and nothing is amiss. Others might even claim that Hong Kong is freer today than it ever was.
CCP-approved Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee (李家超) claimed that “press freedom is in our pocket.”
Whose pocket Lee was referring to was left unsaid. In fact, Hong Kong’s press is not in anyone’s pocket, but rather in a CCP-designed cage.
The 2020 National Security Law effectively curtailed press freedom, and the list of journalists targeted by Lee’s puppet regime has grown by the month.
The Trust Project, an international consortium of news organizations that promotes transparency and accountability in media, halted its Hong Kong operations last month, citing an “increasingly difficult environment for news organizations to operate freely and independently.”
Over the past few months, several journalists have been arrested, and others have been threatened. Hong Kong Journalists Association chairman Ronson Chan (陳朗昇) was arrested in September while reporting a story and charged with obstruction merely for doing his job.
With journalists regularly incarcerated and newspapers gutted or closed down, it is hardly a surprise that public trust in the media has declined.
However, the most striking and terrifying example of the authorities’ unprecedented attack on press freedom is the persecution of Jimmy Lai (黎智英).
A media tycoon and famous democracy advocate, Lai was sentenced to 13 months in prison last year for attending an unauthorized vigil for the victims of China’s 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre. This month, he received an additional sentence of five years and nine months.
Lai, who has already been jailed for more than two years for taking part in peaceful protests, was convicted of what the US Department of State has described as “spurious fraud charges.”
Ironically, his sentencing took place on Dec. 10, Human Rights Day. Lee’s government and the judges hand-picked to do its bidding do not seem to care about the difference between civil and criminal law, much less about human rights.
Lai has been harassed and persecuted because he represents so much of what Beijing hates. Born in China 75 years ago, Lai escaped communism and its calamitous failures when he was smuggled into Hong Kong at the age of 12. Shocked by the massacre at Tiananmen Square, he became an outspoken advocate of freedom and democracy, unafraid to call out the CCP and always prepared to stand up for Hong Kong’s liberties. His newspaper Apple Daily, which he founded in 1995, was a beacon of democracy and Hong Kong’s second-most read publication until its forced closure last year.
A Chinese refugee who prospered in Hong Kong’s free society and stood up for the community that enabled his success, rather than leave, was more than the regime could bear.
However, in a new twist, Hong Kong has appealed to the Chinese government to overturn an earlier court decision that allowed Lai to be represented by a British lawyer. In the appeal, Lee argued that foreign lawyers cannot be trusted because they could be pressured to follow their countries’ instructions regarding sensitive cases.
What Lee neglected to mention is that foreign-born judges already sit in Hong Kong’s courts, including its highest — the Court of Final Appeal. Just in case the CCP rejected its appeal, Lee’s government refused to grant Lai’s British lawyer a visa to stay in Hong Kong.
The episode serves as yet another reminder of how Chinese communism is incrementally demolishing due process and the rule of law.
Some are still willing to denounce the unjust imprisonment of democracy advocates such as Lai.
However, sadly, some expatriates working in Hong Kong find it more convenient to look the other way. They are prepared to tolerate the oppressive tactics that drive so many of Hong Kong’s citizens into exile, and some have gone out of their way to argue that everything is fine and that Hong Kong has not changed.
The long-time supporters of the CCP in Hong Kong, the so-called United Front, at least have the excuse of actually believing that communism is the future.
However, what about those who toe the party line while holding foreign passports and healthy bank balances?
Is their silence driven by greed, or by fear of government retribution?
Lai is not only a Chinese patriot who represents the best of his country and civilization, he is also a British citizen. Although he holds a UK passport, Lai did not take his millions and run. Instead, Lai, a devout Catholic, is to spend Christmas in a cell in the maximum-security Stanley Prison.
If Beijing gets its way, that is where he would spend his remaining Christmases. For liberal democracy to prevail over authoritarianism, people with Lai’s courage and convictions must not be forgotten. Their fate — freedom or tyranny — is ours.
Chris Patten, the last British governor of Hong Kong and former EU commissioner for external affairs, is chancellor of the University of Oxford.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Before the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can blockade, invade, and destroy the democracy on Taiwan, the CCP seeks to make the world an accomplice to Taiwan’s subjugation by harassing any government that confers any degree of marginal recognition, or defies the CCP’s “One China Principle” diktat that there is no free nation of Taiwan. For United States President Donald Trump’s upcoming May 14, 2026 visit to China, the CCP’s top wish has nothing to do with Trump’s ongoing dismantling of the CCP’s Axis of Evil. The CCP’s first demand is for Trump to cease US
RSS