When it comes to China’s attitude toward the free world, Hong Kong has long been considered a canary in the coal mine. The Chinese government’s treatment of the territory is a good indicator of how the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) might engage with non-totalitarian countries. How Western governments respond to China’s recent actions could also be a reliable measure of the vitality and sustainability of liberal democracy as a model of governance.
As Hong Kong increasingly targets dissidents and shreds the freedoms that once defined it, a small chorus of quislings could pretend that nothing has changed and nothing is amiss. Others might even claim that Hong Kong is freer today than it ever was.
CCP-approved Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee (李家超) claimed that “press freedom is in our pocket.”
Whose pocket Lee was referring to was left unsaid. In fact, Hong Kong’s press is not in anyone’s pocket, but rather in a CCP-designed cage.
The 2020 National Security Law effectively curtailed press freedom, and the list of journalists targeted by Lee’s puppet regime has grown by the month.
The Trust Project, an international consortium of news organizations that promotes transparency and accountability in media, halted its Hong Kong operations last month, citing an “increasingly difficult environment for news organizations to operate freely and independently.”
Over the past few months, several journalists have been arrested, and others have been threatened. Hong Kong Journalists Association chairman Ronson Chan (陳朗昇) was arrested in September while reporting a story and charged with obstruction merely for doing his job.
With journalists regularly incarcerated and newspapers gutted or closed down, it is hardly a surprise that public trust in the media has declined.
However, the most striking and terrifying example of the authorities’ unprecedented attack on press freedom is the persecution of Jimmy Lai (黎智英).
A media tycoon and famous democracy advocate, Lai was sentenced to 13 months in prison last year for attending an unauthorized vigil for the victims of China’s 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre. This month, he received an additional sentence of five years and nine months.
Lai, who has already been jailed for more than two years for taking part in peaceful protests, was convicted of what the US Department of State has described as “spurious fraud charges.”
Ironically, his sentencing took place on Dec. 10, Human Rights Day. Lee’s government and the judges hand-picked to do its bidding do not seem to care about the difference between civil and criminal law, much less about human rights.
Lai has been harassed and persecuted because he represents so much of what Beijing hates. Born in China 75 years ago, Lai escaped communism and its calamitous failures when he was smuggled into Hong Kong at the age of 12. Shocked by the massacre at Tiananmen Square, he became an outspoken advocate of freedom and democracy, unafraid to call out the CCP and always prepared to stand up for Hong Kong’s liberties. His newspaper Apple Daily, which he founded in 1995, was a beacon of democracy and Hong Kong’s second-most read publication until its forced closure last year.
A Chinese refugee who prospered in Hong Kong’s free society and stood up for the community that enabled his success, rather than leave, was more than the regime could bear.
However, in a new twist, Hong Kong has appealed to the Chinese government to overturn an earlier court decision that allowed Lai to be represented by a British lawyer. In the appeal, Lee argued that foreign lawyers cannot be trusted because they could be pressured to follow their countries’ instructions regarding sensitive cases.
What Lee neglected to mention is that foreign-born judges already sit in Hong Kong’s courts, including its highest — the Court of Final Appeal. Just in case the CCP rejected its appeal, Lee’s government refused to grant Lai’s British lawyer a visa to stay in Hong Kong.
The episode serves as yet another reminder of how Chinese communism is incrementally demolishing due process and the rule of law.
Some are still willing to denounce the unjust imprisonment of democracy advocates such as Lai.
However, sadly, some expatriates working in Hong Kong find it more convenient to look the other way. They are prepared to tolerate the oppressive tactics that drive so many of Hong Kong’s citizens into exile, and some have gone out of their way to argue that everything is fine and that Hong Kong has not changed.
The long-time supporters of the CCP in Hong Kong, the so-called United Front, at least have the excuse of actually believing that communism is the future.
However, what about those who toe the party line while holding foreign passports and healthy bank balances?
Is their silence driven by greed, or by fear of government retribution?
Lai is not only a Chinese patriot who represents the best of his country and civilization, he is also a British citizen. Although he holds a UK passport, Lai did not take his millions and run. Instead, Lai, a devout Catholic, is to spend Christmas in a cell in the maximum-security Stanley Prison.
If Beijing gets its way, that is where he would spend his remaining Christmases. For liberal democracy to prevail over authoritarianism, people with Lai’s courage and convictions must not be forgotten. Their fate — freedom or tyranny — is ours.
Chris Patten, the last British governor of Hong Kong and former EU commissioner for external affairs, is chancellor of the University of Oxford.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS