A tense scene in the 2004 movie I, Robot shows the character played by Will Smith arguing with an android about humanity’s creative prowess. “Can a robot write a symphony?” he asks, rhetorically. “Can a robot turn a canvas into a beautiful masterpiece?”
“Can you?” the robot answers.
Machines would not need the snarky reply in our reality. The answer would simply be “yes.”
Illustration: Mountain People
In the past few years, artificial intelligence (AI) systems have shifted from being able to process content — recognizing faces or reading and transcribing text — to creating digital paintings or writing essays.
The digital artist Beeple was shocked in August when several Twitter users generated their own versions of one of his paintings with AI-powered tools. Similar software can create music and even videos. The broad term describing all this is “generative AI,” and as this latest lurch into our digital future becomes part of our present, some familiar tech industry challenges such as copyright and social harm are already re-emerging.
We will probably look back on this year as when generative AI exploded into mainstream attention, as image-generating systems from OpenAI and the open source start-up Stability AI were released to the public, prompting a flood of fantastical images on social media.
One of the technological milestones that sparked the rise of generative AI was the advent of the transformer model. First proposed in a paper by Google researchers in 2017, the models needed less time to train and could underpin higher quality AI systems for generating language.
The breakthroughs are still coming thick and fast. Last week, researchers at Meta Platforms announced an AI system that could negotiate with humans and generate dialogue in a strategy game called Diplomacy. Venture capital investment in the field grew to US$1.3 billion in deals this year, data from research firm Pitchbook showed, even as it contracted for other areas in tech. (Deal volume grew almost 500 percent last year.)
Companies that sell AI systems for generating text and images would be among the first to make money, said Sonya Huang, a partner at Sequoia Capital, which published a “map” of generative AI companies that went viral this month.
An especially lucrative field would be gaming, already the largest category for consumer digital spending.
“What if gaming was generated by anything your brain could imagine, and the game just develops as you go?” Huang said.
Most generative AI start-ups are building on top of a few popular AI models that they either pay to access or get for free. OpenAI, the artificial intelligence research company cofounded by Elon Musk and mostly funded by Microsoft, sells access to its image generator DALL-E 2 and its automatic text writer GPT-3. (Its forthcoming iteration of the latter, known as GPT-4, is reputed by its developers to be freakishly proficient at mimicking human jokes, poetry and other forms of writing.)
These advancements would not carry on unfettered, and one of the thorniest problems to be resolved is copyright. Typing in “a dragon in the style of Greg Rutkowski” would churn out artwork that looks like it could have come from the forenamed digital artist who creates fantasy landscapes. Rutkowski receives no financial benefit for that, even if the generated image is used for a commercial purpose, something the artist has publicly complained about.
Popular image generators such as DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion are shielded by the US’ fair use doctrine, which hinges on free expression as a defense for using copyrighted work. Their AI systems are trained on millions of images including Rutkowski’s, so in theory they benefit from a direct exploitation of the original work.
Copyright lawyers and technologists are split on whether artists will ever be compensated.
In theory, AI firms could eventually copy the licensing model used by music-streaming services, but AI decisions are typically inscrutable — how would they track usage? One path might be to compensate artists when their name comes up in a prompt, but it would be up to the AI companies to set up that infrastructure and police its use.
Ratcheting up the pressure is a class action lawsuit against Microsoft, Github and OpenAI over copyright involving a code-generating tool called Copilot, a case that could set a precedent for the broader generative AI field.
Then there is content itself. If AI is quickly generating more information than humanly possible — including, inevitably, pornography — what happens when some of it is harmful or misleading?
Facebook and Twitter have improved their ability to clean up misinformation on their sites in the past two years, but they could face a much greater challenge from text-generating tools — like OpenAI’s — that set their efforts back. The issue was recently underscored by a new tool from Facebook parent Meta itself.
Earlier this month Meta unveiled Galactica, a language system specializing in science that could write research papers and Wikipedia articles. Within three days, Meta shut it down. Early testers found it was generating nonsense that sounded dangerously realistic, including instructions on how to make napalm in a bathtub and Wikipedia entries on the benefits of being white or how bears live in space.
The eerie effect was facts mixed in so finely with hogwash that it was hard to tell the difference between the two. Political and health-related misinformation is hard enough to track when it is written by humans. What happens when it is generated by machines that sound increasingly like people?
That could turn out to be the biggest mess of all.
Parmy Olson is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology. A former reporter for the Wall Street Journal and Forbes, she is author of We Are Anonymous. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and