The Ministry of Economic Affairs this month proposed tax incentives in its latest effort to safeguard Taiwan’s crucial role in the world’s chip supply chain, following similar, but more significant, incentives and subsidies launched in the US, EU, Japan and South Korea. While efforts in those countries aim to subsidize the construction of new factories to build their own resilient chip operations, the ministry’s proposal is focused on incentivizing research and development (R&D), which makes sense, as Taiwanese firms have already built a strong domestic foothold with hefty investments in capacity.
The draft amendment to the Statute for Industrial Innovation (產業創新條例) proposes a 25 percent tax deduction on eligible companies’ R&D costs, up from 15 percent. It also proposes a tax break of 5 percent on advanced equipment procurement, granted the total deductions do not exceed 50 percent of a firm’s overall income taxes. The ministry is pushing the legislature to pass the bill before the end of the year.
However, the bill does not specify a minimum level of R&D expenditure to qualify for the tax breaks, leaving some companies worried that they might be excluded from the incentives. Instituting a high threshold of NT$10 billion (US$322.45 million) in R&D expenditures per year would only benefit large companies such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and smartphone chip designer MediaTek Inc, which invested NT$300 billion a year in Taiwan, primarily in R&D.
The ministry said its plan seeks to encourage new investment in cutting-edge technologies and advanced equipment across sectors such as 5G, electric vehicles and low Earth orbit satellites. That would make it difficult to help small start-ups that cannot easily break into those fields.
The bill also does not define the word “advanced.” A high bar would make it inaccessible to most businesses. TSMC considers the 7-nanometer manufacturing process and smaller to be advanced. If the ministry agrees, then Microelectronics Corp, TSMC’s closest rival in Taiwan, would not squeeze onto the short list for tax breaks with its 14-nanometer process, which is one generation behind 7-nanometer production.
Powerchip Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp chairman Frank Huang (黃崇仁) said it would be “unfair and unreasonable” if the tax breaks were only available to certain big companies’ investments in “advanced” technologies. Powerchip makes power management chips and IC chips for displays using less advanced technologies, including 40-nanometer and 90-nanometer processes.
Taiwan’s effort to spur chip development provides limited financial support to local industries and would have minimal effect, given its insignificant scale and lack of scope. The ministry’s measures do not touch on the most important issues local businesses face, such as talent shortages. The tax breaks are only available for investments in advanced technology development and capacity expansion, which companies have been doing to stay competitive even without government incentives.
The semiconductor industry deserves the ministry’s help in any form, as it has significantly contributed to the country’s GDP. The ministry must be thorough in creating policies to keep such a vital industry thriving.
US President Donald Trump last week told reporters that he had signed about 12 letters to US trading partners, which were set to be sent out yesterday, levying unilateral tariff rates of up to 70 percent from Aug. 1. However, Trump did not say which countries the letters would be sent to, nor did he discuss the specific tariff rates, reports said. The news of the tariff letters came as Washington and Hanoi reached a trade deal earlier last week to cut tariffs on Vietnamese exports to the US to 20 percent from 46 percent, making it the first Asian country
On Monday, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) delivered a welcome speech at the ILA-ASIL Asia-Pacific Research Forum, addressing more than 50 international law experts from more than 20 countries. With an aim to refute the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) claim to be the successor to the 1945 Chinese government and its assertion that China acquired sovereignty over Taiwan, Lin articulated three key legal positions in his speech: First, the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Declaration were not legally binding instruments and thus had no legal effect for territorial disposition. All determinations must be based on the San Francisco Peace
As things heated up in the Middle East in early June, some in the Pentagon resisted American involvement in the Israel-Iran war because it would divert American attention and resources from the real challenge: China. This was exactly wrong. Rather, bombing Iran was the best thing that could have happened for America’s Asia policy. When it came to dealing with the Iranian nuclear program, “all options are on the table” had become an American mantra over the past two decades. But the more often US administration officials insisted that military force was in the cards, the less anyone believed it. After
During an impromptu Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) rally on Tuesday last week to protest what the party called the unfairness of the judicial system, a young TPP supporter said that if Taiwan goes to war, he would “surrender to the [Chinese] People’s Liberation Army [PLA] with unyielding determination.” The rally was held after former Taipei deputy mayor Pong Cheng-sheng’s (彭振聲) wife took her life prior to Pong’s appearance in court to testify in the Core Pacific corruption case involving former Taipei mayor and TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). The TPP supporter said President William Lai (賴清德) was leading them to die on
RSS