As the new US House Republican majority stumbles into power, with all the chaotic, embittered bumbling of a rich man’s son who can only seem to fail upwards, another, peculiar kind of political transition is taking place: US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi, 82, is leaving her position, almost certainly for the last time.
Perhaps no individual has come to symbolize Democrats more to the people who do not like the party. To Republicans, Pelosi has long taken on a kind of mythic malice. To the Fox News-watching white male, Pelosi symbolizes liberal elitism, a vague but totalizing specter of corruption, and that particular kind of liberal decadence that can be evoked by the name of the city that makes up nearly all of her longtime congressional district: San Francisco.
She is a woman in power, and she has long been supportive of gay rights, and she opposed the US invasion of Iraq.
She has been a reliable opponent of conservatives’ favorite culture war crusades — she supports gun control and opposes Confederate statues. In an association facilitated by misogyny, her very face is a shorthand for liberal extremism, a visual code that denotes secularism, taxation and frightening new pronouns.
Which was always a bit of a stretch, because the fact of the matter is that the US left wing tends to hate Pelosi, too. To them, her two terms as speaker — first from 2007 to 2011, and again from 2019 until this coming January — were eras of strictly enforced centrism. Under Pelosi’s tenure, the congressional agenda was kept well to the right of the base’s preferences, and leftist stars like US Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez were needlessly sidelined.
Pelosi has taken positions that frustrate and disappoint the Democratic rank and file. She allegedly knew about waterboarding torture during the war on terror, and she did not object to it; she has backed Israel even in its most flagrant violations of Palestinian rights; and for all the fear and hatred she provokes in Republicans, some Democrats found her insufficiently willing to attack them.
Under her leadership, the House impeached former US president Donald Trump twice, but the Rubicon of impeachment was only crossed belatedly, in the face of Pelosi’s long, obstinate resistance.
Many Democrats felt that the impeachments — along with other congressional oversight efforts against the Trump administration — were tepid and came too late.
Neither of these understandings of Pelosi really capture the most striking aspect of her career, which has been characterized, above all, by an almost preternatural ability to discipline her caucus.
Perhaps no speaker has been so successful at securing votes and cultivating the loyalties of her members. In interviews, Democratic House members speak of her with awe, as if she is something between a charismatic high school teacher and an emotionally withholding mom.
This charisma is carefully cultivated. She famously tells no one her secrets, but has a long memory — both for past favors and past grievances. Some members seem to be eagerly seeking her approval. None seem willing to cross her. She has a natural instinct for politics, able to anticipate how to persuade someone to do what she wants them to do before they often know themselves.
Pelosi cultivated this talent from a young age. At the beginning of her political career, she painted herself as a mom and housewife, a devoted spouse to Paul, an obscenely wealthy financier, and a doting mother of five children.
However, this pretended humility was always a rather flimsy facade. In reality, Pelosi is the scion of an influential Democratic political family from Maryland. Her father was a congressman, and her dad and brother served as mayors of Baltimore. Her job as speaker was one she had been training for since infancy, or at least since she attended her first presidential inauguration, at 12.
After she and her husband moved to San Francisco, Pelosi swiftly rose in the ranks of the California Democratic Party, in part because Nancy, with her comfort among elites and the almost coercive power of her charm, was very good at raising money.
Pelosi was elected to the US Congress in 1986, and never looked back. She quickly stood out as a charismatic voice in public and an aggressive negotiator in private. she became the leader of the US House Democrats in 2003, and ascended to become the first — and so far, the only — woman to serve as speaker, in 2007.
Under Pelosi’s tenure, the House Democrats have achieved some herculean tasks of political maneuvering. Everything that the party has accomplished legislatively since 2007, they have accomplished thanks to Pelosi’s control of her caucus. She forced through the Dodd-Frank campaign finance reform bill in the face of the kind of fearsome opposition that a politician of weaker will would have balked at. She managed to pass the massive Affordable Care Act, expanding healthcare coverage to millions, in a show of persuasion and strength that could terrify grown men, and did.
These are the kinds of bruising political battles that would end a different House representative’s career, but Pelosi’s district is among the safest blue seats in the country. She has never faced a real challenger for her spot. During her election years, she does not even engage in debates, and her re-election campaigns are little more than formalities — everyone, in San Francisco and elsewhere, knows that that seat belongs to Nancy Pelosi for as long as she wants it.
This safety is what allowed Pelosi to turn to her bigger, more national ambitions. Her real constituency has long been the whole country — or at least, the whole of the Democratic party.
However, recent years have taken the shine off of Pelosi. She stood in the way when Democrats wanted to pass ethics reforms that would have forbidden members of Congress from trading individual stocks. This past summer, she made the dangerous choice to travel alone to Taiwan, in a show of defiance against Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
The constant attacks on her personally from the right have begun to take a grim toll. This fall, a crazed man broke into her California home with a hammer and attacked Pelosi’s husband, fracturing his skull. The man was reportedly there looking for Pelosi.
Perhaps the quintessential moment of this part of Pelosi’s career came during the hearings into the riot at the US Capitol on Jan. 6 last year, when footage of the speaker taken during the attack emerged. In the hidden location where House members had been taken, she made brisk phone calls, searching for a way to clear the Capitol. Her calm competence, contrasted with her extreme physical frailty, made for a portrait of integrity, endurance and courage.
Even then, Pelosi seemed out of place. In the video, her institutionalism, and her faith in the legal process, shines through.
You get the sense that she feels strongly that everything will be all right, if only she can make the right phone call. As the mob stormed the Capitol, and Trump orchestrated them on Twitter like a symphony conductor, Pelosi’s technocratic proceduralism could not have stood in starker contrast. She looked, perhaps for the first time, like a figure from a lost era.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS