Tensions in the Taiwan Strait have been put in the spotlight, grabbing global attention and highlighting the importance of Taiwan’s defense capabilities.
When previously facing China’s threats, Taiwan followed the principles of non-provocation and not firing the first shot.
However, China has been constantly employing “gray zone” tactics to intimidate and spy on Taiwan. It has sent more frequent aircraft, ships and drones to the military gray zone between the two sides.
China’s military threats and its ambitions to annex Taiwan have become blatant, a cause for great concern for democratic countries.
Minister of National Defense Chiu Kuo-cheng (邱國正) said in the Legislative Yuan a few days ago that the tacit understanding that each side keep to their own side of the Taiwan Strait median line has essentially been destroyed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and the military “status quo” between the two sides of the Strait has therefore changed.
“Taiwan’s military was rather self-restrained in the beginning, but having been encroached over and over again, we have adjusted our response — if any aircraft or vessel crosses the line, we will destroy them,” Chiu said.
Chiu is right. As Taiwan has endured China’s threats for many years, if the nation continues to retreat, even the basic framework of its defense operations and territory would eventually disappear.
Chiu’s statement could not only change the military’s mentality in the face of a Chinese incursion, but could change thinking among Taiwanese about cross-strait relations.
People certainly do not want armed conflict between the two sides of the Strait; preparation for war is one of the most effective means of preserving peace.
This is the attitude that the military and Taiwanese should keep in mind. Chiu’s remarks are a boost. Under such guidelines, a safer environment for Taiwan can be created.
Li Kuan-long is a lecturer at the Center for General Education at Cheng Shiu University.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS