To cope with the overlap of COVID-19 and influenza, the Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) on Oct. 1 launched a government-funded flu vaccination program. For the first phase, parents of children under the age of six months are eligible, as are healthcare workers at preschools, childcare centers and institutes.
However, providers of family childcare services are not eligible.
Just like healthcare workers employed by registered institutes, home-based childcare providers — commonly referred to as “nannies” — are professional caregivers. Both groups work with parents to take care of children, who are more susceptible to viruses. It is therefore important to have the little ones vaccinated, but at the same time, vaccine efficacy and effectiveness in adults cannot be emphasized enough.
Not until adults are well protected can they provide proper, uninterrupted care. Professional caregivers should be vaccinated along with parents, not after.
While nursery service centers or public nursery homes play a role in childcare services, the majority of young children in Taiwan are looked after by nannies. About 27,000 nannies provide childcare services for more than 40,000 children, with about 30,000 of them under the age of two. Yet, in the CECC’s vaccination program, nannies are discriminated against, which would almost certainly affect parents who have nannies to look after their children.
It might cause a breach in the wall of disease prevention for COVID-19 and influenza.
Home-based childcare providers are indispensable to Taiwan’s childcare industry and family support. Nannies offer tremendous help to parents in dual-income households, attending to the needs of children as they grow up. Nannies make a great contribution and yet they are often neglected, becoming the Cinderella of Taiwan’s policies.
The government should include providers of family childcare services in the first phase of the government-funded flu vaccination program. To increase vaccine efficacy and effectiveness nationwide, and to make sure children receive full care, nannies must not be excluded.
Li Ting-hsin is a research specialist with the Peng Wan-ru Foundation.
Translated by Liu Yi-hung
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
More than a week after Hondurans voted, the country still does not know who will be its next president. The Honduran National Electoral Council has not declared a winner, and the transmission of results has experienced repeated malfunctions that interrupted updates for almost 24 hours at times. The delay has become the second-longest post-electoral silence since the election of former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernandez of the National Party in 2017, which was tainted by accusations of fraud. Once again, this has raised concerns among observers, civil society groups and the international community. The preliminary results remain close, but both
Beijing’s diplomatic tightening with Jakarta is not an isolated episode; it is a piece of a long-term strategy that realigns the prices of choices across the Indo-Pacific. The principle is simple. There is no need to impose an alliance if one can make a given trajectory convenient and the alternative costly. By tying Indonesia’s modernization to capital, technology and logistics corridors, and by obtaining in public the reaffirmation of the “one China” principle, Beijing builds a constraint that can be activated tomorrow on sensitive issues. The most sensitive is Taiwan. If we look at systemic constraints, the question is not whether