From devising a diplomacy strategy in collaboration with the US to ensuring the continued existence of the Republic of China (ROC) government in exile, no one has made a greater contribution, nor been treated so poorly, as former minister of foreign affairs George Yeh (葉公超), who wrote: “History teaches little about modern affairs; songs feel different from [when] one was young.”
Would the current crop of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) politicians be in any way comparable to someone of his caliber?
During the Cold War, the ROC government declared two groups its main enemies: the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the “Taiwan independents.” It regarded both groups as equally dangerous.
The waishengren (外省人) — those who came from China with the KMT after the Chinese Civil War, and their offspring — among its perceived enemies were labeled “communist agents,” while the benshengren (本省人) — whose ancestors migrated to Taiwan before the Japanese colonial era — among its perceived enemies were labeled “independents.”
Former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) never wavered in his national day speeches, repeating the same slogan: “We will retake the mainland.”
The US asked Yeh to urge Chiang to change his tune, believing that he would otherwise risk falling from grace. Yeh replied that it was only natural for a general such as Chiang to rely on slogans.
“Retaking the mainland” would involve launching a war. While some hawkish KMT members at the time proposed “fighting back,” there were no incentives for benshengren party members to comply.
Waishengren KMT members with a bit of backbone — such as Free China Journal cofounder Lei Chen (雷震) — were bold enough to declare Chiang’s dream a lost cause and tried to dissuade him, but no one dared to accuse the KMT of bringing Taiwan to the brink of war. Any hope of “retaking the mainland” has long been a delusion, but now the CCP and Russia have become one big happy family, with their sights on nations that would fulfill their expansionist ambitions.
However, after turning its back on Chiang, the KMT now parrots the CCP’s propaganda by spreading anti-US narratives and fueling rumors about the CCP’s timeline for an invasion of Taiwan, turning self-defense into provocation and enemy into friend. Those KMT members who are willing to kowtow to China always say: “We are one of them; they are one of us.”
Yeh was responsible for signing the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty in 1952 and the Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty in 1954, which declared that the ROC’s territory was limited to “Taiwan and the Pescadores,” a definition that sought to ensure Taiwan’s national security.
It is absurd that certain KMT members are claiming that Taiwanese cannot use the phrase “Taiwan National Day.”
Chiang and Yeh were at odds with each other about Mongolia’s 1961 application to join the UN, with Yeh being the intermediary between the ROC and the US. The US tried to bring Chiang around via a secret emissary, but it was Yeh who ended up being the scapegoat. He was removed from office and banned from leaving Taiwan.
There remain KMT politicians who showed their blind loyalty by claiming that the decrepit, vacillating KMT “simply cannot fall.”
Yet United Microelectronics Corp founder Robert Tsao (曹興誠), a Taiwanese born in China and an entrepreneur who has seen the true colors of the CCP and Russia, hit the KMT with the remark: “I want to ask this Chinese person, [former president] Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), how much longer will you be bullying Taiwanese?”
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Rita Wang
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run