As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) marches toward his second decade in power, predictions abound that he will ease policies that have sealed China’s borders, battered stocks and blown up the US dollar bond market. There is little sign any such shift is in the works.
The optimism hinges on expectations Xi will usher in a more benign investing environment after the twice-a-decade Chinese Communist Party (CCP) congress slated to start on Sunday. The idea is policymakers will take bolder steps to shore up the economy once Xi locks in a precedent-breaking third term and packs key posts with loyalists.
Wall Street banks are looking for stronger coordination across departments that set policy, making it easier to align investment. Some predict Xi will start to pivot away from his “zero COVID-19” orthodoxy. Others say the government will do more to ensure the property market crisis does not threaten the banking system.
Illustration: Yusha
“There is a lot of wishful thinking that after the party congress is out of the way and Xi secures a third term, China will become pragmatic again and refocus on economic growth,” East Capital Asset Management partner and founder Karine Hirn said. “This is unlikely. The data isn’t actually horrible enough for a rethink.”
This year’s congress comes at a time of greater domestic uncertainty for China than any such gathering since the aftermath of the Tiananmen Square Massacre in 1989. Economists are predicting the slowest annual growth in more than four decades as COVID-19 pandemic measures continue to roil the nation. The yuan sank to a 14-year low last month, while government efforts to rein in debt have triggered a property crisis.
Even with all that pain, China is still far from facing a systemic crisis that threatens the stability of its banking system, for example.
Xi politically looks as strong as ever. While Beijing’s simultaneous edicts for local governments to maintain growth and lock down over every virus outbreak have prompted complaints about mixed messages, there is little indication these have translated into internal opposition. Sporadic protests that have erupted over lockdowns and undelivered homes have not evolved into broader political dissent.
CONSOLIDATION
Xi is expected to use the upcoming congress to further consolidate control over the party’s 25-member politburo, after filling several seats with allies five years ago. Key policies that have battered tech giants such as Tencent Holdings Ltd and made China’s stocks the worst performers in the world over Xi’s second term are likely to gain emphasis in documents produced by the congress.
“If anything, Xi is likely to renew the party’s focus on regulatory agendas such as ‘common prosperity’ at the upcoming congress,” Eurasia Group Ltd China analyst Neil Thomas said.
Xi has already shifted the party to focus on the quality, rather than quantity, of growth and is unlikely to pivot on key policies as he tightens his grip on the party, he added.
Investors are still reckoning with the fallout. Xi’s heavy hand in everything from tutoring firms to bad-debt managers and China Evergrande Group sent repeated shock waves across Chinese markets in the past two years, saddling funds with losses when virtually everything else in the world was rallying. An index tracking the Chinese junk dollar bond market, dominated by the nation’s real-estate developers, is down 35 percent for the year.
Funds outside China were particularly punished. The CSI 300 Index of onshore stocks outperformed the MSCI China Index — the most widely followed China benchmark among international funds — by 24 percentage points since Xi canned Ant Group Co’s listing in late 2020. About 87 percent of this year’s credit defaults occurred offshore, while delinquencies in the much larger yuan-denominated market dropped to their lowest level since records began in 2018.
Xi’s government argues the cleanup will help reduce financial risk and create a more sustainable future for China’s economy in the long run.
However, the damage to investor confidence is adding to jitters in a market already grappling with weakening economic growth and the fallout from the US Federal Reserve’s battle against inflation.
Rather than satisfying the whims of international investors, Beijing’s focus is on fortifying its domestic markets. That inward shift is unlikely to reverse as Xi seeks to ringfence the economy against geopolitical shocks and increasingly fraught rivalry with Washington.
“Tensions with the US and the overriding priority of national security are leading to a retreat to the domestic market,” Bloomberg Economics chief Asia economist Chang Shu (舒暢) said. “US sanctions on Russia have made China much more cautious about integration. China now needs to balance financial security and financial liberalization.”
Chinese companies are increasingly seeking funding at a local level, with about 90 percent of this year’s initial public offering proceeds sold in Shanghai and Shenzhen over Hong Kong or New York, the biggest proportion since 1999, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Local corporate bond sales surged ahead of the US for two consecutive months, something that had not ever happened.
INVESTOR CONFIDENCE
The question is whether attracting overseas capital into mainland markets will remain a priority for the party. Investor confidence has been so damaged during Xi’s second term that Wall Street’s forecasts for a more stabilizing next five years are falling on deaf ears.
“There’s a lot of nervousness and a lot of negativity,” Citigroup Inc Asia-Pacific head of markets Julia Raiskin told Bloomberg TV on Sept. 29. “An even bigger shock to the market would be an upside surprise, something positive out of the 20th party congress. I don’t think the market is positioned for that at all.”
Citigroup equity strategists expect a “sharper focus on the economy” that will help reduce uncertainty, a note said last month.
Changes in the following months could include more nationwide efforts to stabilize the housing market and a “meaningful” shift in the COVID-19 management strategy that shows China is serious about reopening, the analysts wrote.
The desire to ensure stability is one reason China is holding on to “zero COVID-19”, Bank of America Corp economist Helen Qiao told Bloomberg TV last month, arguing that incentive will fade after the congress.
Xi’s trip to Central Asia last month and reportedly planned forays to Indonesia and Thailand suggest China is pushing for reintegration with the rest of the world, Qiao said.
A “favorable political cycle” is why Goldman Sachs Group Inc’s equities team remains positive, according to a Sept. 18 note. They highlight the conflicting goals of China’s main policies — monetary, fiscal, property, industry regulation and COVID-19-related — and say the confirmation of top leadership positions will help reduce them.
Still, it will take a lot to convince global investors to start buying Chinese assets. Paying heed to sell-side enthusiasm for China has proved expensive in the recent past.
“Any expectation that China will go back to what it was is misguided,” Dong Chen, Pictet Wealth Management’s head of Asia macroeconomic research, said by telephone from Geneva, Switzerland. “The third term will be all about implementation and a wrap up of the new policies.”
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS