Incentive for teachers
As a person who has worked in the education sector my whole working life, I find the recently suggested policy of giving teachers who have taught for 10 years a paid month off ill-advised. I am quite sure the policy must have been formulated with good intentions, but I cannot see how it would provide much incentive or encouragement to teachers, and instead will cause more complications.
There are two reasons for this: One is that the 10-year stipulation is too long, and there are no specific details on whether teachers who have taught for 20, 30 or 40 years would receive the same bonus. The second is that compared with the existing winter and summer holidays, the policy’s one paid month off is too short, and therefore lacks sufficient incentive value.
I find it highly impractical and a confusion of priorities to give teachers who have been on the job for 10 years a paid month off while substitute teachers are still receiving only 10 months of pay every year. I suggest that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei mayoral candidate Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) grasp the nettle and address the issue of substitute teachers being woefully underpaid first.
People need to know that schools are confronting shortages of substitute teachers, resulting in some schools not being able to find substitute teachers after the semester has begun or some administrative heads having to take on the additional task of teaching.
As schools are struggling to find substitute teachers for one-year contracts, it would only be more difficult for them to find substitute teachers for a monthly term in due course.
Hu Yen-chih
Taipei
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed