The hazards of keeping up with the Joneses. The relentlessness with which central banks are raising interest rates reflects alarm at rising prices — and an aversion to being portrayed as insufficiently courageous at a time of economic peril. With so much hiking, officials should fret about the broader impact of the course they are on. The recession they are courting might be no ordinary downturn.
The world is experiencing one of the most synchronized bouts of monetary and fiscal tightening in the past five decades, according to the World Bank. While the US Federal Reserve on Wednesday stole the show with a third consecutive hike of 75 basis points, rates would almost certainly march higher in coming days in places as diverse as the UK, Indonesia, the Philippines and Norway.
Earlier this month, the European Central Bank pulled off its first 75-basis-point jump and left the door open for more. Sweden’s Riksbank shocked markets on Tuesday by lifting its main rate by a full percentage point.
It is the countries that have not ratcheted up borrowing costs — often by significant margins — that stand out. The era of the global central bank might be with us in all but name, as much as policymakers themselves would bristle at the suggestion. About 90 central banks have raised rates this year and half of them have increased by at least three-quarters of a percentage point in a single bound, based on Bloomberg News calculations. This week’s hikes alone might exceed 500 basis points.
Even the outliers are less than comfortable. The Bank of Japan, which has refused to budge, faces hard questions about why it clings to an ultra-easy stance when inflation has well and truly breached its 2 percent target. Inflation climbed to the highest in more than three decades last month.
China is trying to support a fragile expansion, although authorities fret about inflation and are hesitant to unleash massive stimulus. Such an approach by the People’s Bank of China would be limited in effectiveness, given Beijing’s “zero COVID-19” strategy that has locked down huge cities.
It is a brave central banker who worries too loudly about other countries when headlines scream about inflation at home and politicians pile on. Most monetary agencies have at least some autonomy, but they still operate in a political environment. Policymakers face hostile questions in parliamentary hearings and some legislators go so far as to call for resignations. That is an understandable, if disappointing, reaction when jumps in the consumer price index lead the evening news. If officials harbor concerns about the subpar performance of the global economy — and there are sound reasons to be anxious — they tend to be publicly muted about it.
GLOBAL IMPACT
One person who has flagged the need to think globally is Fed Vice Chair Lael Brainard. While not for a minute challenging the desirability of reining in demand and prices, she did keep an eye on the potential consequences of the global policy lockstep.
“The rapidity of the tightening cycle and its global nature, as well as the uncertainty around the pace at which the effects of tighter financial conditions are working their way through aggregate demand, create risks associated with overtightening,” Brainard said in a speech on Sept. 7.
In other words, the collapsing world picture would prevent a jumbo hike from turning into a mega hike, but that is about it, for now. While World Bank economists do not have a global slump as their baseline scenario, they are pessimistic.
Drawing on insights from earlier recessions, a paper released last week noted that every world downdraft since 1970 has been presaged by significant weakness the prior year.
“These developments do not auger well for the likelihood a global recession can be avoided,” Justin Damien Guenette, Ayhan Kose and Naotaka Sugawara wrote.
It might conceivably resemble the 1982 vintage, they said.
That was the slide that followed then-Fed chair Paul Volcker’s assault on inflation. While inflation was beaten and Volcker earned his place in the pantheon of economic history, the economy was strangled in the process.
There is danger today that, acting out of domestic concerns, the response to higher inflation will ricochet far beyond national boundaries.
“Because these policies are highly synchronous across countries, they could be mutually compounding in their effects — tightening financial conditions and steepening the global growth slowdown more than envisioned,” Guenette, Kose and Sugawara said.
A rallying cry for fans of central banks, whenever politicians make noises about rates, is to protect autonomy at almost any cost.
However, what about central banks being independent of each other, especially the Fed? The impact of the whole might be more consequential — and keenly felt — than the sum of the parts. An atlas might be as useful as dot-plots at this point.
Daniel Moss is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian economies. Previously, he was executive editor of Bloomberg News for economics. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations