Judging by the coverage of pro-government media, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan scored a major geopolitical victory for his country at last week’s NATO summit in Madrid.
“Turkey slammed its fist on the table, Europe came to its knees,” the conservative Yeni Akit daily said.
This was a reference to Erdogan’s brinkmanship over the accession of Sweden and Finland, which forced the alliance’s other members to invest time and energy in entreating him, just as NATO faces its sternest test in decades as a result of Russian expansionism. The Nordic nations eventually signed an agreement with Turkey, pledging to address its security concerns, which center mainly on Kurdish groups that Ankara considers terrorists.
This allowed Erdogan to withdraw his objections to their membership. As a reward, he got a face-to-face meeting with US President Joe Biden and the White House’s backing for the sale of F-16 jets to Turkey. NATO also held a special session to discuss its southern flank, allowing the Turkish leader to raise the threat of Kurdish terrorist groups, his personal hobbyhorse.
In the weeks and months ahead, Erdogan will talk up his success in Spain as he ratchets up his re-election campaign. With less than a year to go before he faces an electorate in severe economic distress, the president would take any opportunity for chest-thumping he can get.
However, Turks paying close attention to the 11th-hour machinations in Madrid would know Erdogan gained very little — and might have lost a lot. If he got a few talking points for his campaign speeches, the president gave up a chance to return Turkey to the high table of international affairs.
Erdogan could have played it differently. Instead of holding up Sweden and Finland, he might have used his status as NATO’s longest-serving leader to be the statesman at a time of strife. His views about the crisis growing along NATO’s eastern borders, with the war in Ukraine and anxiety in the Baltics, would have been especially valuable, because he enjoys a closer relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin than anybody else in the alliance.
Instead, his gamesmanship confirmed Erdogan’s reputation within NATO as a spoiler who pursues personal advantage above the collective good.
When Sweden and Finland join the alliance, the list of members with bitter experience of his self-serving opportunism would grow by two. The others, already angered by his making common cause with Putin and compromising the security of the group as a whole by purchasing Russian missile-defense systems, would not forget that when a major crisis confronted them all, Erdogan chose to play parochial politics.
And to what end? There is less to that agreement with the Nordic countries than meets the eye. Although Sweden and Finland agreed to address Turkey’s longstanding complaints that they give shelter to Kurdish terrorists and other groups dedicated to Erdogan’s downfall, they have more than enough room to obfuscate when it comes to taking action against those Ankara has identified as enemies.
Evidence of the wriggle room would soon be at hand. Turkey has asked Sweden and Finland to extradite 33 individuals. Some are reportedly members of the Kurdish Workers Party, or PKK, which is designated a terrorist group by the US and the EU, as well as Turkey. Others are followers of Fethullah Gulen, a Pennsylvania-based Turkish cleric and former Erdogan ally whom Ankara blames for a 2016 coup attempt. (Gulen has rejected the accusation.)
However, the agreement announced in Madrid does not commit Sweden and Finland to hand over specific individuals, much less oblige them to change their extradition laws. The burden of proof they would require from Turkey is substantial, and the odds that any of the 33 would be put on a plane to Ankara anytime soon are not very good.
The other commitment in the trilateral agreement is somewhat more significant: The two Nordic countries would lift arms embargoes against Turkey — but the weapons Ankara covets most tend to be American, and Erdogan made no breakthroughs on that front.
Biden’s support for the sale of the F-16s was hardly a concession: It has been expected for many months. The main hurdle had been in the US Congress, where lawmakers were holding up the sale to punish Erdogan for his 2017 decision to purchase Russian-made S-400 missile-defense systems, despite US warnings that they would compromise NATO security. And even there, objections had already softened before the kerfuffle over NATO expansion.
In any case, the F-16s are only a consolation prize. Turkey remains barred from acquiring more advanced F-35s — it was meant to participate in the manufacture of the jets, but was dropped from the program when it bought the S-400.
And that face-to-face meeting with Biden? The two men smiled dutifully for the cameras, and Erdogan can use those images to advertise his status as a world leader, but Biden would not have changed his assessment that the Turkish leader is an autocrat and that the US ought to “embolden” his opponents to defeat him next year. Erdogan might yet find that Biden was not so much smiling as baring his teeth.
As for that NATO session on the southern flank, that was not so much a concession to Turkey as an indulgence to Spain, the summit’s host, which wanted a discussion on migration and militant groups in Africa.
Erdogan has long gotten away with foreign-policy adventurism at the expense of Turkey’s allies, and he extended that streak in Madrid — but the returns from his maneuvering have dwindled nearly to the point of nothing.
Bobby Ghosh is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering foreign affairs. Previously, he was editor-in-chief at the Hindustan Times, managing editor at Quartz and international editor at Time. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
RSS