Let the reader beware
A Taipei Times opinion piece published on Wednesday titled “Taiwanese media help China with propaganda” by Tommy Lin (林逸民) once more shines a bright light on the ethical responsibilities of communicators on both sides of the equation — journalists and publicists. The public turns to its preferred media outlets for clarification of the day’s events, and the media, rightfully so, turn to publicists for that information as well, but here is where the difference lies.
The general public, by and large, often do not have the ability to sift through reams of news releases and other documents to gather relevant facts. The media, on the other hand, for the most part do. It becomes their responsibility to gather the information, sift through it for applicable facts from all sides of the discussion and compile their analysis into an unbiased report.
Yes, this requires more work, which requires more time, but it ensures that what the public reads/sees/hears is a balanced account from which each individual can draw his or her own conclusion.
Let us hope that this will remain the goal, both of publicists and journalists: Fair and accurate dissemination of news that benefits the public and democracy.
Kirk Hazlett
Chair of the Board of Ethics and Professional Standards at the Public Relations Society of America
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Last month, two major diplomatic events unfolded in Southeast Asia that suggested subtle shifts in the region’s strategic landscape. The 46th ASEAN Summit and the inaugural ASEAN-Gulf-Cooperation Council (GCC)-China Trilateral Summit in Kuala Lumpur coincided with French President Emmanuel Macron’s high-profile visits to Vietnam, Indonesia and Singapore. Together, they highlighted ASEAN’s maturing global posture, deepening regional integration and China’s intensifying efforts to recalibrate its economic diplomacy amid uncertainties posed by the US. The ASEAN summit took place amid rising protectionist policies from the US, notably sweeping tariffs on goods from Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, with duties as high as 49 percent.
RSS