Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) is currently in the US, trying to convince officials and academics in Washington that the KMT is pro-US, pro-peace and pro-democracy. Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is in Taiwan, making waves that muddy Chu’s message.
On Saturday last week, the 33rd anniversary of the Tiananmen Square Massacre — which he euphemistically refers to as the “June 4 Incident” in deference to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) — Ma posted an article that has been interpreted as praise for Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and his “democracy with Chinese characteristics,” and the idea that this form of democracy is better than the one practiced in Taiwan.
In defense of Ma, his article is not that: His remarks on democracy in China are tempered with an acknowledgement that Beijing needs to move forward with it, and that this process begins with sincerely facing up to the trauma of the “incident,” and that democracy is interpreted differently on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
However, the criticism is valid in that Ma refuses to address the elephant in the room — Xi’s human rights abuses and interpretation of democracy that no adherent to the traditional understanding of that form of government would understand. His refusal to address these two points is so egregious there is little point discussing the details here.
More ridiculous was how he turned the discussion to Taiwan and portrayed democracy here as being on the decline, as it drifts into an “illiberal democracy” under the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文).
Ma has repeatedly espoused this theme over the past three years. However, his ideas are baseless: Again, there is no need to discuss them here.
What we can usefully take from his article is what it reveals about his idea of government. Ma prefers a form of governance that is closer to Xi’s and further from a recognizable democracy, and relies on a self-appointed “benevolent” regime that presumes to know what the people want better than the people do themselves, such as the one he was formerly part of under the pre-democratization government of the KMT on Taiwan.
Ma has yet to come to terms with the “ignominy” of the KMT’s loss of power to the DPP, and has convinced himself that the fabricated “sins” of the pro-localization party somehow vindicate his sense of the KMT’s entitlement to govern Taiwan. He sees the DPP administrations of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) from 2000 to 2008 and of Tsai from 2016 as historical anomalies.
His comments blaming the destabilization of the international situation not on the CCP’s provocations and bellicosity, but on the “‘anti-China” trend led by the US may have frustrated Chu, who is trying to convince Washington that the KMT is pro-US and pro-democracy. However, Chu himself let slip evidence of the same sense of entitlement for the party that Ma’s article exudes.
On Monday, Chu gave a presentation on the future of Taiwan, which was cohosted by the Brookings Institution and the Center for Strategic and International Studies. During the address, he mentioned that the KMT would be reopening its liaison office in Washington so that the party could once more have a voice in the US.
When “we returned to power in 2008, we closed the office. Maybe we miscalculated the moment. We thought [the] KMT would be always as a ruling party forever [sic],” he said.
It was not a throwaway remark; it was not said in jest.
If he had thought Ma was off message about the KMT as a “pro-democracy party,” he showed his own true colors with this remark.
The sense of entitlement to govern Taiwan is not Ma’s or Chu’s alone; it permeates their generation of the KMT. It is so ingrained they probably have no idea how bad their words sound.
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
RSS