Last month finally saw some movement on the LGBTQ equality front, as the legislature’s Judiciary and Organic Laws and Statutes Committee passed a preliminary review of an amendment that would allow same-sex couples to jointly adopt children.
The amendment to the Act for the Judicial Yuan’s Implementation of Constitutional Interpretation No. 748 (司法院釋字第七四八號解釋施行法) still has some way to go before passage and its eventual enactment, with the next phase being cross-party negotiations. Still, it is refreshing to see progress — however slight — after three years of legal battles following the passage of the act in 2019.
The change seeks to right an omission in the statutes on adoption long criticized by LGBTQ and children’s advocates. As it stands, Article 20 of the law only permits a spouse to adopt the biological child of their partner, refusing by omission adoption of a child not related to either partner. Laws on assisted reproduction are also limited to “a husband and wife” under the Assisted Reproduction Act (人工生殖法), meaning that even couples biologically capable of bearing children cannot legally do so.
In practice, this means that children can only be adopted by one spouse, leaving the other a legal stranger to their child. If the unthinkable were to happen to the legal parent, their child would become a ward of the state, despite still having a parent, not to mention the litany of other rights denied them, such as medical power of attorney and parental leave.
This denial not only harms the rights of the couple, but also of the children who could be denied parents without any reason other than the mistaken belief that same-sex parents are less capable than different-sex parents. Considering all the extra hurdles same-sex parents must jump to become parents, it stands to reason that they are, if anything, among the best prepared. Especially with the adoption rate being only about one-third, any chance to pair children with loving parents should be supported.
Even though the law has not yet formally changed, one couple in January finally became legal parents after a court granted the second partner full parental rights, becoming the first same-sex couple in Asia to do so. Chen Jun-ju (陳俊儒) and Wang Chen-wei (王振圍) had hoped that marriage equality in 2019 would allow Chen to formally adopt their daughter, nicknamed Joujou (肉肉), but were disappointed to find that marriage would still be unable to make their family whole in the eyes of the law.
Although two other comparable cases were brought at the same time, only Chen and Wang were granted full parental rights, with the officer presiding over their case citing the omission in the law of any specific mention of non-biological children, as well as the best interests of the child. In the other two cases, the courts were unwilling to read the omission as granting legal leeway.
The framers likely fabricated this confusion when they wrote the law, intending to avoid angering either side of the heated adoption debate. By never explicitly mentioning non-biological children, courts were granted power of interpretation, even if they have not been willing to use it.
Now sentiment has shifted, with a government survey last month finding 71 percent of respondents believe same-sex couples should have the right to adopt, while 71.8 percent believe they can be good parents. As Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Cheng Yun-peng (鄭運鵬) said when the amendment passed the committee: “Now it is time for Taiwan to take care of the next generation.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry