We all tend to follow habits at work and in other aspects of our lives. I generally work best in the morning and hate working after dinner. Our habits usually reflect preferences, learning, or a combination of the two — or, as Charles Duhigg notes in his book The Power of Habit, the mere repetition of an act might generate a routine.
My research shows that criminals are not all that different from law-abiding citizens when it comes to sticking to a routine, possibly as a result of their experience, their tendency to specialize and their belief that they have developed an ideal strategy. Police departments are catching on, with the assistance of an increasingly common tool: algorithms.
Because algorithms use patterns in data to predict future behavior, they can forecast the movies someone might like on Netflix or the books a person might buy on Amazon, but they can also help law-enforcement agencies fight crime.
Some algorithms calculate prison inmates’ future recidivism. Others underpin predictive-policing tools, which generate crime forecasts with the aim of optimizing patrols.
Investments in predictive analytics have led to a reallocation of resources — including through different policing strategies and alternative sentencing — and thus alter the probability of arrest or detention across individuals. For this reason, it is important to understand whether these algorithmic tools reduce crime, and whether they do so without generating biases against certain groups.
The most elaborate and well-known predictive-policing software has evolved from hotspot maps. These programs operate on the principle that areas recently subject to high numbers of crimes are more likely to have high near-term crime rates. Thus, law-enforcement agencies focus on these areas to deter the largest number of criminals.
While researchers have shown that these statistical algorithms have greater predictive power than simple averages, proving that they actually reduce crime is considerably more difficult. Police departments tend to embrace predictive policing when crime is high, and subsequent reductions might reflect a natural decline that has nothing to do with that decision.
Area-focused policing could also simply shift crime elsewhere. A proper evaluation therefore requires a better counterfactual scenario: What would have happened to crime without the use of predictive policing?
As for bias, it is not inconceivable that predictive policing might distort law-enforcement outcomes. Areas that are more deprived might have higher crime rates, and thus would be patrolled more intensively once predictive policing is introduced. If police resources remain fixed, criminals in deprived areas could have a greater chance of encountering a police patrol than criminals in more affluent neighborhoods.
However, while this is a fair outcome for serial offenders who contributed to the spike in crime that led to the extra patrolling, today’s first-time offenders did not previously increase the crime numbers. Because most predictive-policing algorithms bundle together crime incidents without separating habitual criminals from first-time offenders, they might be biased against the latter in deprived areas.
To help address questions of effectiveness and bias, I evaluated predictive-policing software used in Milan, Italy. This allowed me to establish a proper counterfactual: For historical reasons, Milan has two police departments that share the same objectives, but only one of them uses predictive policing.
KeyCrime, the predictive software used in Milan, differs from common predictive-policing tools because it focuses on arresting perpetrators rather than deterring them — denying criminals the opportunity simply to go somewhere else — and distinguishes first-time offenders from recurrent criminals.
The software uses information gathered from victim reports and CCTV cameras to link criminals to commercial robberies, and then predicts when and where a particular individual or group might strike next. KeyCrime generates individual predictions, which reduces the scope for bias.
The results indicate that analyzing the habits of recurrent criminals more than doubles the likelihood of arresting them. Thieves tend to act in a similar way over time, targeting a specific neighborhood and type of business, as well as sticking to a certain time of day.
For example, someone who previously robbed a jewelry shop at 9am is likely to reoffend in the same neighborhood, at about the same time and against another jeweler. Since there are only so many matches that fit the predictions, the software highlights the potential future targets, and the police department organizes patrols to catch the thief.
Micro-predictions based on individual criminal groups’ behavior have been proven to work in combating robberies and are being extended to other types of serial offenders, such as sex offenders and terrorists. Whether predictive policing is equally successful in bringing these criminals to justice remains to be seen, as reduced interaction with victims and availability of CCTV footage might make it more difficult to link offenders across incidents.
More widespread use of predictive policing could lead criminals to change their habits and become less predictable, but the development of more powerful algorithms and data-gathering processes provides some grounds for optimism among police departments.
“Crime is terribly revealing,” Agatha Christie wrote. “Try and vary your methods as you will, your tastes, your habits, your attitude of mind, and your soul is revealed by your actions.”
For now, building capacity to predict individual crimes by using criminals’ habits against them appears to be a good investment.
Giovanni Mastrobuoni, Carlo Alberto chair at Collegio Carlo Alberto, is an economics professor at the University of Essex, England.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs