The term “zoonotic spillover” might sound either reassuringly geeky or deceptively innocuous — like a sticky mess involving a melted ice cream cone between the monkey cage and the aquarium. It refers, in reality, to one of the greatest dangers to humanity.
As such, it is neither more nor less menacing than climate change, but a direct consequence of it.
The word zoonosis comes from the Greek for “animal disease.” It applies to pathogens that can jump both between animals, and from them to us.
HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, hopped to humans from chimps, for example. Middle East respiratory syndrome spread to us from dromedary camels. Ebola probably came from apes, monkeys or bats, or all of them.
In similar ways, we have imported hundreds of other ills from the wild kingdom — not least SARS-CoV-2, which we also picked up from bats.
What does this have to do with climate change?
A lot. The more animals mingle — with other fauna or us — the more opportunities the pathogens they are hosting have to travel, mutate and spread, and global warming causes exactly such mingling.
As average temperatures rise, they change habitats. Wet areas become arid, cool or lush zones turn into deserts, and so forth. As a result, animals migrate out of their familiar surroundings and come in contact with many other species, most of which they have never before encountered.
A team working with Colin Carlson, a biologist at Georgetown University in Washington, has now used some very fancy math to model the contacts and cross-species virus transmission we can expect.
They have published the results in the journal Nature.
It makes for frightening reading.
Both the mingling and the transmission are already well underway, but will accelerate dramatically in our lifetime.
Even in the most conservative warming scenario, for example, we can expect another 15,000 viruses to hop among 3,000 species of mammals in the coming decades.
The main melting pots will not be the regions near the polar north or south, as might be expected, but the higher elevations of Asia and Africa.
Mammals play a starring role in this horror movie mainly because they are genetically close enough to us for their bugs to wreak havoc in our bodies.
Bats present a particular threat because they can fly and are thus able to migrate farther and faster. Brazilian free-tailed bats, for example, have spread throughout the southeastern US in recent years.
Global warming also abets pathogens in many other ways. For example, it causes a thaw of the permafrost. That frozen ground in northern latitudes is a vast arsenal of ancient viruses and bacteria. The frost has kept them away from wildlife so long, animals and people no longer have any immunity to them, but now they are coming out of their icy vaults.
There have been outbreaks of anthrax in Siberia after spores wafted out of ancient reindeer carcasses previously sealed in the ice.
We can expect much more of this sort of thing.
Can we do anything about all these threats?
Only up to a point.
We should certainly clamp down on deforestation — especially in the Amazon rainforest — which also forces species into involuntary contact with one another and us, and we should regulate and monitor wildlife markets, farms and other places where species jostle up against one another.
Above all, we should prepare for future epidemics and pandemics now.
For decades before COVID-19 arrived, various Cassandras told us to have a plan and make it global, but we largely ignored them, but the most urgent and important effort to which we must recommit is the struggle against climate change itself.
In the Paris Agreement of 2015, we collectively declared the ambition to keep global warming to a long-term increase of 1.5°C over temperatures in the 19th century. No chance. According to new projections by meteorologists, we are likely to breach that threshold by 2026.
From here on, every additional uptick on the thermometer also raises our risk of disease.
Andreas Kluth is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering European politics. A former editor-in-chief of Handelsblatt Global and a writer for The Economist, he is author of Hannibal and Me. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs