The term “zoonotic spillover” might sound either reassuringly geeky or deceptively innocuous — like a sticky mess involving a melted ice cream cone between the monkey cage and the aquarium. It refers, in reality, to one of the greatest dangers to humanity.
As such, it is neither more nor less menacing than climate change, but a direct consequence of it.
The word zoonosis comes from the Greek for “animal disease.” It applies to pathogens that can jump both between animals, and from them to us.
HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, hopped to humans from chimps, for example. Middle East respiratory syndrome spread to us from dromedary camels. Ebola probably came from apes, monkeys or bats, or all of them.
In similar ways, we have imported hundreds of other ills from the wild kingdom — not least SARS-CoV-2, which we also picked up from bats.
What does this have to do with climate change?
A lot. The more animals mingle — with other fauna or us — the more opportunities the pathogens they are hosting have to travel, mutate and spread, and global warming causes exactly such mingling.
As average temperatures rise, they change habitats. Wet areas become arid, cool or lush zones turn into deserts, and so forth. As a result, animals migrate out of their familiar surroundings and come in contact with many other species, most of which they have never before encountered.
A team working with Colin Carlson, a biologist at Georgetown University in Washington, has now used some very fancy math to model the contacts and cross-species virus transmission we can expect.
They have published the results in the journal Nature.
It makes for frightening reading.
Both the mingling and the transmission are already well underway, but will accelerate dramatically in our lifetime.
Even in the most conservative warming scenario, for example, we can expect another 15,000 viruses to hop among 3,000 species of mammals in the coming decades.
The main melting pots will not be the regions near the polar north or south, as might be expected, but the higher elevations of Asia and Africa.
Mammals play a starring role in this horror movie mainly because they are genetically close enough to us for their bugs to wreak havoc in our bodies.
Bats present a particular threat because they can fly and are thus able to migrate farther and faster. Brazilian free-tailed bats, for example, have spread throughout the southeastern US in recent years.
Global warming also abets pathogens in many other ways. For example, it causes a thaw of the permafrost. That frozen ground in northern latitudes is a vast arsenal of ancient viruses and bacteria. The frost has kept them away from wildlife so long, animals and people no longer have any immunity to them, but now they are coming out of their icy vaults.
There have been outbreaks of anthrax in Siberia after spores wafted out of ancient reindeer carcasses previously sealed in the ice.
We can expect much more of this sort of thing.
Can we do anything about all these threats?
Only up to a point.
We should certainly clamp down on deforestation — especially in the Amazon rainforest — which also forces species into involuntary contact with one another and us, and we should regulate and monitor wildlife markets, farms and other places where species jostle up against one another.
Above all, we should prepare for future epidemics and pandemics now.
For decades before COVID-19 arrived, various Cassandras told us to have a plan and make it global, but we largely ignored them, but the most urgent and important effort to which we must recommit is the struggle against climate change itself.
In the Paris Agreement of 2015, we collectively declared the ambition to keep global warming to a long-term increase of 1.5°C over temperatures in the 19th century. No chance. According to new projections by meteorologists, we are likely to breach that threshold by 2026.
From here on, every additional uptick on the thermometer also raises our risk of disease.
Andreas Kluth is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering European politics. A former editor-in-chief of Handelsblatt Global and a writer for The Economist, he is author of Hannibal and Me. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
Taiwan ranks second globally in terms of share of population with a higher-education degree, with about 60 percent of Taiwanese holding a post-secondary or graduate degree, a survey by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development showed. The findings are consistent with Ministry of the Interior data, which showed that as of the end of last year, 10.602 million Taiwanese had completed post-secondary education or higher. Among them, the number of women with graduate degrees was 786,000, an increase of 48.1 percent over the past decade and a faster rate of growth than among men. A highly educated population brings clear advantages.
RSS