The term “zoonotic spillover” might sound either reassuringly geeky or deceptively innocuous — like a sticky mess involving a melted ice cream cone between the monkey cage and the aquarium. It refers, in reality, to one of the greatest dangers to humanity.
As such, it is neither more nor less menacing than climate change, but a direct consequence of it.
The word zoonosis comes from the Greek for “animal disease.” It applies to pathogens that can jump both between animals, and from them to us.
HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, hopped to humans from chimps, for example. Middle East respiratory syndrome spread to us from dromedary camels. Ebola probably came from apes, monkeys or bats, or all of them.
In similar ways, we have imported hundreds of other ills from the wild kingdom — not least SARS-CoV-2, which we also picked up from bats.
What does this have to do with climate change?
A lot. The more animals mingle — with other fauna or us — the more opportunities the pathogens they are hosting have to travel, mutate and spread, and global warming causes exactly such mingling.
As average temperatures rise, they change habitats. Wet areas become arid, cool or lush zones turn into deserts, and so forth. As a result, animals migrate out of their familiar surroundings and come in contact with many other species, most of which they have never before encountered.
A team working with Colin Carlson, a biologist at Georgetown University in Washington, has now used some very fancy math to model the contacts and cross-species virus transmission we can expect.
They have published the results in the journal Nature.
It makes for frightening reading.
Both the mingling and the transmission are already well underway, but will accelerate dramatically in our lifetime.
Even in the most conservative warming scenario, for example, we can expect another 15,000 viruses to hop among 3,000 species of mammals in the coming decades.
The main melting pots will not be the regions near the polar north or south, as might be expected, but the higher elevations of Asia and Africa.
Mammals play a starring role in this horror movie mainly because they are genetically close enough to us for their bugs to wreak havoc in our bodies.
Bats present a particular threat because they can fly and are thus able to migrate farther and faster. Brazilian free-tailed bats, for example, have spread throughout the southeastern US in recent years.
Global warming also abets pathogens in many other ways. For example, it causes a thaw of the permafrost. That frozen ground in northern latitudes is a vast arsenal of ancient viruses and bacteria. The frost has kept them away from wildlife so long, animals and people no longer have any immunity to them, but now they are coming out of their icy vaults.
There have been outbreaks of anthrax in Siberia after spores wafted out of ancient reindeer carcasses previously sealed in the ice.
We can expect much more of this sort of thing.
Can we do anything about all these threats?
Only up to a point.
We should certainly clamp down on deforestation — especially in the Amazon rainforest — which also forces species into involuntary contact with one another and us, and we should regulate and monitor wildlife markets, farms and other places where species jostle up against one another.
Above all, we should prepare for future epidemics and pandemics now.
For decades before COVID-19 arrived, various Cassandras told us to have a plan and make it global, but we largely ignored them, but the most urgent and important effort to which we must recommit is the struggle against climate change itself.
In the Paris Agreement of 2015, we collectively declared the ambition to keep global warming to a long-term increase of 1.5°C over temperatures in the 19th century. No chance. According to new projections by meteorologists, we are likely to breach that threshold by 2026.
From here on, every additional uptick on the thermometer also raises our risk of disease.
Andreas Kluth is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering European politics. A former editor-in-chief of Handelsblatt Global and a writer for The Economist, he is author of Hannibal and Me. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The Jumbo Floating Restaurant was a landmark in Hong Kong for nearly half a century. The palatial restaurant, with its pastiche Chinese architecture and neon lights perfectly encapsulated the territory’s beguiling balance of East and West, tradition and modernity. It was a feature backdrop in numerous Hong Kong films. However, forced to close amid the stringent COVID-19 lockdown policies of Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥) and denied financial support from her government, the floating temple to Cantonese gastronomy was towed from its mooring in Aberdeen Harbour this month by its owners with its planned destination not released. On June
Opinion polls show that Taiwan’s judicial system and law enforcement “enjoy” low approval ratings among Taiwanese. In spite of data showing low crime rates, many Taiwanese drivers have faced aggressive driving, unprovoked road rage, road blocking and unmotivated police officers. Some criminals seem to consider themselves above the law, which is not completely wrong. Reports about so-called “road blocking” can be found in newspapers or on YouTube. An example of this is when “road rowdies” block a vehicle on a road, get out of their vehicle and start to attack the occupants of the blocked vehicle — often attacking in a
Ned Price, spokesperson of the United States Department of State, is a Twitter influencer at the exalted “celebrity/macro” rank. So, even though it was well after working hours on Friday evening, May 20, 2022 — as Secretary of State Antony Blinken prepared for President Biden’s first presidential trip to Asia — Ned Price was sure of an audience as he “tweeted” the following message: “The PRC continues to publicly misrepresent U.S. policy. The United States does not subscribe to the PRC’s ‘one China principle’ — we remain committed to our longstanding, bipartisan one China policy, guided by the Taiwan Relations Act,
An April circular by the Chinese Ministry of Education on student admission criteria at Tibetan universities has been harrowing and discriminating to say the least. The circular said that prospective students must state their “political attitude and ideological morality” to be considered for admission. It also said that students should not be involved in religious movements and students who are proficient in Marxist theory should be preferred. Since Beijing started occupying Tibet, it has meticulously introduced policies to dismantle the Tibetan education system, which is closely tied to its rich monastic tradition, and has even pulled students from Afghanistan and eastern
RSS