The reform of the Taiwan Railways Administration (TRA) has yet to bear any real fruit, despite attempts to straighten out the service for the past 30 years.
The past three decades have seen all manner of committees set up, while bandying around impressive-sounding words such as transformation, reconstruction, consolidation, separation of ownership and operatorship, corporatization and privatization.
The Ministry of Transportation and Communications is once again advocating restructuring through corporatization, saying that this would be completed in two years.
Who knows whether the ministry will be successful? One thing is certain: The project is doomed to fail unless specific matters are addressed.
First, the ministry must relinquish control of personnel appointments. It should not just change TRA directors and division superintendents simply because the minister is displeased for whatever reason. This task should be left to professional managers, with trained personnel allowed to deal with technical problems that arise.
In the case of major accidents, those responsible for the failings that resulted in such incidents should be dealt with accordingly, and the ultimate responsibility should be given in accordance with the law.
Second, the TRA’s debts should be written off. This debate has been going on for years, but current TRA personnel should no longer be held liable for the debt. It is a mystery why they have to wait until the TRA’s corporatization for its debt to be written off.
Third, the TRA needs room to make its own decisions. The organization is under the direct control of four government departments, in addition to legislators and local elected representatives, all of whom have a say in the agency’s affairs.
There are always plenty of supervisors and inspection briefings, but the officials in charge come and go, and they have little or no expertise in railway affairs. Those officials have proposed all sorts of “solutions,” but all administrative and operating procedures remain the same, which is of little help in effecting reform.
For example, when the engineering division sought to procure a track inspection car, it had to be reported to the Legislative Yuan, with the specifications changed many times. The acceptance check failed seven times, resulting in the TRA director-general being called in to negotiate for one more chance. Ten years later and there is still no sign of the needed track inspection car.
Fourth, the TRA should be given full authority to procure maintenance equipment and vehicles, and to schedule operations according to its business requirements.
The construction of major rail projects made with major state investment and the procurement of passenger cars and vehicles related to railway operations should still be controlled by the ministry.
Fifth, the TRA’s income comes from operating and non-operating revenue. Ticket sales are its main source of operating revenue, but it has no power to adjust train frequency and fares by itself, resulting in a paradox that the longer the service time, the cheaper the fare.
As for the much-anticipated non-operating revenue, including the revitalization and reuse of TRA’s old buildings, restrictions on the railway accounting system and administrative procedures get in the way of efficiency.
Those who have power over the agency should let go of that control. Once they loosen their tight grip, the TRA will have a chance to flourish.
Chen Honling is a civil engineer.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international