The reform of the Taiwan Railways Administration (TRA) has yet to bear any real fruit, despite attempts to straighten out the service for the past 30 years.
The past three decades have seen all manner of committees set up, while bandying around impressive-sounding words such as transformation, reconstruction, consolidation, separation of ownership and operatorship, corporatization and privatization.
The Ministry of Transportation and Communications is once again advocating restructuring through corporatization, saying that this would be completed in two years.
Who knows whether the ministry will be successful? One thing is certain: The project is doomed to fail unless specific matters are addressed.
First, the ministry must relinquish control of personnel appointments. It should not just change TRA directors and division superintendents simply because the minister is displeased for whatever reason. This task should be left to professional managers, with trained personnel allowed to deal with technical problems that arise.
In the case of major accidents, those responsible for the failings that resulted in such incidents should be dealt with accordingly, and the ultimate responsibility should be given in accordance with the law.
Second, the TRA’s debts should be written off. This debate has been going on for years, but current TRA personnel should no longer be held liable for the debt. It is a mystery why they have to wait until the TRA’s corporatization for its debt to be written off.
Third, the TRA needs room to make its own decisions. The organization is under the direct control of four government departments, in addition to legislators and local elected representatives, all of whom have a say in the agency’s affairs.
There are always plenty of supervisors and inspection briefings, but the officials in charge come and go, and they have little or no expertise in railway affairs. Those officials have proposed all sorts of “solutions,” but all administrative and operating procedures remain the same, which is of little help in effecting reform.
For example, when the engineering division sought to procure a track inspection car, it had to be reported to the Legislative Yuan, with the specifications changed many times. The acceptance check failed seven times, resulting in the TRA director-general being called in to negotiate for one more chance. Ten years later and there is still no sign of the needed track inspection car.
Fourth, the TRA should be given full authority to procure maintenance equipment and vehicles, and to schedule operations according to its business requirements.
The construction of major rail projects made with major state investment and the procurement of passenger cars and vehicles related to railway operations should still be controlled by the ministry.
Fifth, the TRA’s income comes from operating and non-operating revenue. Ticket sales are its main source of operating revenue, but it has no power to adjust train frequency and fares by itself, resulting in a paradox that the longer the service time, the cheaper the fare.
As for the much-anticipated non-operating revenue, including the revitalization and reuse of TRA’s old buildings, restrictions on the railway accounting system and administrative procedures get in the way of efficiency.
Those who have power over the agency should let go of that control. Once they loosen their tight grip, the TRA will have a chance to flourish.
Chen Honling is a civil engineer.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Before the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can blockade, invade, and destroy the democracy on Taiwan, the CCP seeks to make the world an accomplice to Taiwan’s subjugation by harassing any government that confers any degree of marginal recognition, or defies the CCP’s “One China Principle” diktat that there is no free nation of Taiwan. For United States President Donald Trump’s upcoming May 14, 2026 visit to China, the CCP’s top wish has nothing to do with Trump’s ongoing dismantling of the CCP’s Axis of Evil. The CCP’s first demand is for Trump to cease US