South Korea is to hold its 20th presidential election on March 9.
Multiple opinion polls show former South Korean prosecutor general Yoon Suk-yeol, the candidate of the opposition People Power Party, to be slightly ahead of Lee Jae-myung, a former governor of Gyeonggi Province and the candidate of the ruling Democratic Party, although Yoon’s lead is within the margin of error.
As the campaigns enter the final furlong, two incidents at the Beijing Winter Olympics — one involving the appropriation of traditional Korean clothing, the other a perceived biased judging decision — have enraged young South Koreans and boiled over into nationwide anti-China sentiment.
South Korean social media is awash with angry accusations of “cultural plunder” and “cultural engineering” after a female performer wearing a traditional Korean hanbok was presented as a Chinese ethnic minority during a Chinese national flag-passing routine at the opening ceremony.
Beijing has a history of putting ethnic minorities on display at set-piece events to promote the concept of unity of one big “Chinese family,” and performers wearing hanbok have featured at China’s national celebrations for some time.
Given this, why did so many young South Koreans view hanbok being worn at the opening ceremony as a naked provocation that constituted a “plundering” of their cultural identity?
The problem runs much deeper than the clothing itself, which was just a touch paper for deep-seated anti-China sentiment among South Koreans that has been bubbling under the surface for a long time. This long-suppressed anger reached a tipping point.
An opinion poll conducted by a South Korean think tank last year found that 74 percent of the population held a negative sentiment toward China, up from 52 percent in 2019.
Anti-South Korean protests orchestrated by the Chinese government in 2017 over the US’ deployment of its Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system in South Korea and multiple bans of K-pop entertainers in the past few years are still fresh in the memories of many in the country.
Additionally, Beijing’s “wolf warrior” diplomacy, and the extreme nationalism that gave birth to it, coupled with the Democratic Party’s perceived pandering to China, has offended many South Koreans.
These factors are the fundamental cause behind the anti-China backlash during the Olympics.
However, how will this sentiment affect the presidential election?
Yoon has registered the shift in national mood and is playing the anti-China card. He has pledged to strengthen the US-South Korea alliance, mend fences with Japan, deploy additional THAAD units in the country and even said that he would push for membership in the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, also known as the “Quad.”
Yoon’s unequivocal anti-China, pro-US stance is rare for a South Korean presidential candidate, encapsulated by his blunt statement that “most South Koreans, especially young people, dislike China.”
During a television debate prior to the Olympics, Lee criticized Yoon’s pro-US stance and his THAAD deployment pledge, warning that it would severely damage trade relations with China.
However, after the firestorm created at the Olympics, Lee changed his tune and in an interview said that Chinese fishing vessels that illegally cross into South Korean territorial waters should be sunk.
Lee’s U-turn shows that he, too, has registered the shift in national mood and is worried it could scupper his campaign.
The Chinese embassy in Seoul issued a congratulatory message after South Korea won its first gold medal at the Games — a clear indication that Beijing is trying to dampen the fire, unleashing a charm offensive on the South Korean public in an attempt to prevent the installment of a pro-US, anti-China president in the Blue House.
Washington would be able to further consolidate its strategic advantage in Northeast Asia if Seoul moves away from Beijing.
The presidential election will have far-reaching geopolitical ramifications that directly affect Taiwan and the security of the region.
Yang I-pin is an assistant university professor
Translated by Edward Jones
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs