The emergence of illiberal politicians across the West has led to prophecies about the end of democracy.
In the US, former president Donald Trump is maneuvering to return to the White House in 2025, after attempting to overturn an election that he lost in 2020. In France, not one but two far-right populists are running for president, and in Italy, former deputy prime minister Matteo Salvini of the League and former minister of youth Giorgia Meloni of the post-fascist Brothers of Italy might be plausible contenders for the office of prime minister when Italians go to the polls in 2023.
Like right-wing political and media operatives in the US, Salvini and Meloni, as well as French lawmaker Marine Le Pen of the far-right National Rally, have all paid homage to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban.
They have made no secret of their temptation to pursue his brand of illiberalism if given the chance.
Concerns about the future tend to be molded by our most vivid memories of the past. We learned from our parents and grandparents about the threat of fascism, and in the past few years, we have watched authoritarian leaders come to power democratically, only to erode constitutional norms and institutions once in office.
This “electoral” model for establishing autocracy thus has come to seem like a potent threat.
However, are we worrying about the right kind of democratic decline?
A more immediate risk lies in the descent from democracy to “ochlocracy,” a term coined by the Greek historian Polybius during the second century BC to describe mob rule.
Ochlocracy results from politicians using cheap gifts and seductive talk to attract voters who do not appreciate their freedom, because they have never experienced the abuses or repression of nondemocratic governance.
As Polybius explains in The Histories: “As long as some of those survive who experienced the evils of oligarchical dominion, they are well pleased with the present form of government, and set a high value on equality and freedom of speech. But when a new generation arises and the democracy falls into the hands of the grandchildren ... they have become so accustomed to freedom and equality that they no longer value them... So when they begin to lust for power and cannot attain it through themselves or their own good qualities, they ruin their estates, tempting and corrupting the people in every possible way. And ... democracy in its turn is abolished and changes into a rule of force and violence.”
Before Polybius, Plato and Aristotle also agreed that democracy is potentially vulnerable to ever-changing and easily manipulated public moods.
In our time, we call this populism, a label that allows us to shift all the blame for democratic backsliding onto individual populist figures such as Trump, Le Pen or Salvini.
However, while these politicians have fomented fear of immigrants and polarized public opinion, they are not operating in a vacuum. They owe their political successes to voters (and, in Trump’s case, to many conservative elites in the US).
Twenty-first-century ochlocracy tends to go beyond classic populism to implicate broader swaths of public life.
Three symptoms of this process stand out today.
First, mainstream political parties have been hollowed out, with vaguer policy programs and narrower pathways for new leaders to emerge.
The Republican Party in the US is a case in point, but in the country’s past two presidential elections, the Democratic Party has also continued to elevate long-time establishment stalwarts, even when the times seemed to call for new figures and fresh ideas.
In the UK, Prime Minister Boris Johnson commandeered the storied Conservative Party, first by peddling lies about Brexit, and then by feeding the delusion that a divorce from the EU would be easy and beneficial.
It is no surprise that such a leader would feel invulnerable enough to host or attend parties while the rest of the kingdom was under a COVID-19 pandemic lockdown.
The situation is no better in Italy, where no mainstream party has any credible internal democratic processes for selecting new leaders or devising a policy program.
The parties are so hapless that they regularly need to call in technocrats to manage complex crises, such as Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi or his predecessor from 2011 to 2013, Mario Monti.
Recent convulsions among and within parties to select a new head of state are further evidence of how dysfunctional Rome’s political class has become. Only by re-electing Italian President Sergio Mattarella, despite his reluctance, could parties break the stalemate.
A second major symptom of democratic decay is the degradation of the media.
Democracy suffers when media organizations become partisan, polarized and shallow, using sensationalism and fear in pursuit of market share.
When a society is politically polarized, publishers and editors see a commercial opportunity in goading likeminded segments of the population. Fanning the flames becomes a business model.
Especially in the past few years, leading media outlets have found that it pays to take an unflinching position on controversial figures like Trump, Johnson, former Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi or Beppe Grillo, the founder of Italy’s populist Five Star Movement.
By becoming dependent on polarization, media outlets have fed it, doing little to help form public opinion beyond short-term political conflicts.
As then-CBS chief executive officer Leslie Moonves said of Trump’s presidential candidacy in 2016: “It may not be good for America, but it’s damn good for CBS.”
A third symptom is the rise of social media chatter as a dominant influence on politicians’ views and decisions.
As a journalist, I personally know prominent leaders who are addicted to Twitter and spend a considerable part of their days on it. Twitter becomes their reality, while their constituents continue to live in the real world.
A political system with hollowed-out parties is more likely to succumb to such pressures.
As the system increasingly fails to address long-term issues, trust in it erodes and public opinion becomes increasingly volatile, resulting in a now-familiar spiral of noise, ineffectiveness, negligent media, aggressive rhetoric and shortsighted political programs.
This is a formula for ochlocracy. Twenty-two centuries after his death, Polybius has our number.
Federico Fubini is an economics journalist and editor-at-large at Italian daily Corriere della Sera.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) in San Francisco on Tuesday last week said if she had not met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), she would have been “just a plain” and “even negligible” KMT chairperson, bluntly signaling the role she is playing in her visit to the US — Beijing’s messenger from Taiwan. Cheng and her delegation arrived in the US on Monday last week for a two-week visit across five major cities. Her party said the group is scheduled to meet with US lawmakers, officials, policy experts and businesspeople. Before departing, Cheng said her trip
RSS