The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is floundering. Over its past two years of politicking, it has racked up a staggering number of losses on votes that it initiated. Two of its four recall drives failed, and each of the two that succeeded only served to add another Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) seat to the legislature. This is not to mention the slap in the face that was last month’s referendum, with all four of its proposals soundly defeated, despite the money and effort that the party put into them.
For all of its talk about upholding the duties of the opposition and “standing on the side of the people,” the KMT has lost sight of what this means after six years out of power.
As the KMT has itself proclaimed, the role of an opposition party is to hold the ruling party to account. In a perfect system, the opposition would scrutinize government proposals to improve them through free debate on behalf of the minority they represent. Drastic measures such as boycotts would be reserved for truly egregious oversteps as it fine-tuned its platform for the next election.
This is a far cry from reality. Instead of an opposition party, the KMT has fashioned itself into a party of opposition, reflexively opposing the DPP no matter the policy, even when it serves its own interests.
As the examples are nearly innumerable, why not focus on the most recent? On Thursday, KMT lawmakers abstained from participating in a public hearing of the Legislative Yuan’s Constitutional Amendment Committee to protest the DPP’s alleged contravention of procedure, claiming it was “faking the process to deceive the public.” It even went so far as to demand that the DPP take responsibility for the failure of the process, crudely admitting to its plan to tank the amendment and pin it on the DPP.
All of this was done to blockade a popular constitutional amendment that would lower the voting age to 18. Considering its aging voter base, this is the kind of policy that the party should get behind to foster good sentiment among younger demographics. With the right messaging, it could claim credit for the change and show young voters that the KMT is not just their grandparents’ party.
Instead, it has demeaned the youth vote as susceptible only to superficial pandering through KMT swag, terrible rap songs and now non-fungible tokens of party artifacts, as it hops on the digital-art bandwagon with a version of a sword that belonged to former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石).
Even though the party has been burned by its contrarianism time and again, it will have a difficult time changing tack. As reflexive opposition is expected, any cooperation is perceived as a humiliating loss to hardcore KMT supporters.
The party felt this acutely over the weekend when it came under fire from Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) for supporting the resumption of food imports from Fukushima and four other Japanese prefectures, given that Tokyo can guarantee their safety.
There was nothing drastic about the statement released on Friday, yet it apparently made Jaw “almost faint.” He then proceeded to outline the corrupted version of opposition politics that has crippled the KMT, saying that it is the party’s duty as the opposition to present data to counter the DPP. In a perfect system, scientific data would escape politicization and all parties would draft policy based on evidence. Yet that does not mesh with the self-styled party of opposition.
The KMT knows it is floundering. If it continues to oppose everything without offering something to believe in, it will only consign itself to the past.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with