The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is floundering. Over its past two years of politicking, it has racked up a staggering number of losses on votes that it initiated. Two of its four recall drives failed, and each of the two that succeeded only served to add another Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) seat to the legislature. This is not to mention the slap in the face that was last month’s referendum, with all four of its proposals soundly defeated, despite the money and effort that the party put into them.
For all of its talk about upholding the duties of the opposition and “standing on the side of the people,” the KMT has lost sight of what this means after six years out of power.
As the KMT has itself proclaimed, the role of an opposition party is to hold the ruling party to account. In a perfect system, the opposition would scrutinize government proposals to improve them through free debate on behalf of the minority they represent. Drastic measures such as boycotts would be reserved for truly egregious oversteps as it fine-tuned its platform for the next election.
This is a far cry from reality. Instead of an opposition party, the KMT has fashioned itself into a party of opposition, reflexively opposing the DPP no matter the policy, even when it serves its own interests.
As the examples are nearly innumerable, why not focus on the most recent? On Thursday, KMT lawmakers abstained from participating in a public hearing of the Legislative Yuan’s Constitutional Amendment Committee to protest the DPP’s alleged contravention of procedure, claiming it was “faking the process to deceive the public.” It even went so far as to demand that the DPP take responsibility for the failure of the process, crudely admitting to its plan to tank the amendment and pin it on the DPP.
All of this was done to blockade a popular constitutional amendment that would lower the voting age to 18. Considering its aging voter base, this is the kind of policy that the party should get behind to foster good sentiment among younger demographics. With the right messaging, it could claim credit for the change and show young voters that the KMT is not just their grandparents’ party.
Instead, it has demeaned the youth vote as susceptible only to superficial pandering through KMT swag, terrible rap songs and now non-fungible tokens of party artifacts, as it hops on the digital-art bandwagon with a version of a sword that belonged to former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石).
Even though the party has been burned by its contrarianism time and again, it will have a difficult time changing tack. As reflexive opposition is expected, any cooperation is perceived as a humiliating loss to hardcore KMT supporters.
The party felt this acutely over the weekend when it came under fire from Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) for supporting the resumption of food imports from Fukushima and four other Japanese prefectures, given that Tokyo can guarantee their safety.
There was nothing drastic about the statement released on Friday, yet it apparently made Jaw “almost faint.” He then proceeded to outline the corrupted version of opposition politics that has crippled the KMT, saying that it is the party’s duty as the opposition to present data to counter the DPP. In a perfect system, scientific data would escape politicization and all parties would draft policy based on evidence. Yet that does not mesh with the self-styled party of opposition.
The KMT knows it is floundering. If it continues to oppose everything without offering something to believe in, it will only consign itself to the past.
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China