The legislature’s Finance Committee on Dec. 20 approved an amendment to lower the import tariff on champagne from 20 percent to 10 percent. Although the proposal only applies to champagne and not other sparkling wines, it shows the legislature’s willingness to boost Taiwan’s diplomatic relations with the EU.
The change makes sense. Taiwan’s import tariff on red and white wines is 10 percent, but the tariff on champagne and other sparkling wines is twice as much, even though the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Act (菸酒稅法) defines traditional and sparkling wines simply as “brewed alcoholic beverages.”
The only questionable aspect of the proposed amendment is why the tariff on champagne — wines from France’s Champagne region — would only be half of that for other sparkling wines.
Some East Asian countries, including Japan, Singapore and South Korea, do not impose tariffs on imported wines, while the Philippines’ tariff is only 5 percent. Cutting the existing tariffs would therefore be an effective step toward reducing trade barriers between Taiwan and France.
Still more important is the timing of the proposed tariff adjustment. In the summer of 2020, France agreed to allow Taiwan to open a new office in Aix-en-Provence to bolster bilateral economic and cultural exchanges, and in May last year the French Senate voted unanimously to support Taiwan’s extensive participation in international organizations.
The European Chamber of Commerce Taiwan has for many years called for this tariff cut. Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Michelle Lin’s (林楚茵) decision to bring this proposal to the committee at the end of last year is a positive and timely response to the aforementioned developments, symbolizing that Taiwan attaches great importance to meaningful relations and cooperation with Europe, and especially the EU’s 27 member states.
The final aspect to consider is the proposal’s effectiveness. The Ministry of Finance reported that reducing tariffs on champagne would lower revenue by about NT$59.67 million (US$2.16 million), but could generate greater importation and consumption of champagne that would in turn generate NT$5.97 million in tariffs, NT$3.27 million in alcohol taxes, NT$4.46 million in business taxes and NT$1.03 million in income tax.
If those estimates are correct, the annual net loss of tax revenue would be about NT$44.94 million, a mere 0.04 percent of the treasury’s NT$1.8 trillion annual tax revenue. This would have a negligible impact on the nation’s finances.
The champagne tariff reduction would also have little effect on Taiwan’s alcoholic beverage industry, given that there are no competing or alternative products in the domestic market.
Meanwhile, consumers would benefit from lower prices resulting from the reduced costs borne by wine importers, while also seeing a wider range of choice in the market.
France is Taiwan’s fifth-largest European economic and trade partner and its 20th-largest in the world.
The first half of this year happens to be the period in which France holds the rotating presidency of the Council of the EU, as it does only once in every 13 years.
If the Legislative Yuan speeds up passage of the proposed amendment, it is sure to help Taiwan develop multilateral relations with the EU and its member states, and bring new opportunities for international trade.
Elvis Lee is an adjunct assistant professor in Fo Guang University’s Department of Public Affairs.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) chairman Mark Liu (劉德音) said in an interview with CNN on Sunday that a Chinese invasion of Taiwan would render the company’s plants inoperable, and that such a war would produce “no winners.” Not only would Taiwan’s economy be destroyed in a cross-strait conflict, but the impact “would go well beyond semiconductors, and would bring about the destruction of the world’s rules-based order and totally change the geopolitical landscape,” Liu said in the interview, according to the Central News Agency. Bloomberg columnist Hal Brands wrote on June 24: “A major war over Taiwan could create global economic
Washington’s official position on US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan is that nothing has changed: The US government says it is maintaining its “one China” policy, that Pelosi is free to arrange international trips with congressional delegations independent of the government and that she is not the first US official to visit Taiwan even this year. Yet there is no denying that the fact and the optics of the second-in-line to the US presidency speaking with lawmakers at the Legislative Yuan about inter-parliamentary discussions and learning from each other as equals are hugely significant, as were
Amid a fervor in the global media, US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her congressional delegation made a high-profile visit to Taipei. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) awarded a state honor to her at the Presidential Office. Evidently, the occasion took on the aspect of an inter-state relationship between the US and the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan, despite no mutual state recognition between the two. Beijing furiously condemned Pelosi’s visit in advance, with military drills in the waters surrounding coastal China to check the move. Pelosi is a well-known China hawk, and second in the line of succession to
A stark contrast in narratives about China’s future is emerging inside and outside of China. This is partly a function of the dramatic constriction in the flow of people and ideas into and out of China, owing to China’s COVID-19 quarantine requirements. There also are fewer foreign journalists in China to help the outside world make sense of developments. Those foreign journalists and diplomats who are in China often are limited in where they can travel and who they can meet. There also is tighter technological control over information inside China than at any point since the dawn of the
RSS