It has been less than two years since phrases like “flatten the curve,” “contact tracing,” “social distancing” and many others related to the COVID-19 pandemic entered the lexicon and became part of everyday communication. People everywhere have learned more about epidemiology, virology and immunology than they ever expected they would.
Yet, despite the increased attention to public health, few people can name the world’s leading cause of death. That is not an accident.
Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) — especially heart disease, stroke, cancer and diabetes — account for more than 40 million deaths per year, strain healthcare systems, and impose significant social and economic costs, but they do not attract nearly the same attention as infectious diseases such as COVID-19, even though they are largely preventable.
It has long been known that tobacco use, alcohol consumption, and diets that are high in fats, sodium and sugars increase the incidence of NCDs, but, despite some progress, particularly in reducing tobacco use, these risk factors do not receive the attention they deserve in discussions worldwide. That is partly because the companies that manufacture, promote and sell these products play a major role in shaping how the public perceives NCDs.
Tobacco, alcohol and food companies have a long history of downplaying their products’ effects on public health and, since the start of the pandemic, they have used COVID-19-related marketing campaigns and corporate social responsibility initiatives to divert public attention further.
A study covering 18 nations, conducted from March to July last year, collected more than 280 examples of ways Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, Nestle and PepsiCo exploited the public health emergency to market unhealthy products to vulnerable populations.
In Brazil, Nestle and Danone donated ultra-processed foods to a government program to provide food to low-income residents. Coca-Cola contributed its sugary drinks for food parcels in South Africa. Colombian food manufacturer Alpina promoted a high-sugar yogurt as essential to improve the immune system.
Similarly, another report showed that tobacco companies used pandemic-related corporate social responsibility activities to expand access to senior government officials and repair their public image. In one audacious example, Philip Morris International donated ventilators to hospitals in Greece and Ukraine.
The incoherence of a system that works hand in hand with some of the biggest contributors to NCDs while trying to respond to COVID-19 should provoke general outrage, but these activities have gone largely unnoticed and unremarked.
It is true that in some cases corporations have stepped in to deliver goods or services that governments failed to provide, but the state’s inability to fill these gaps must not permit corporations to whitewash the harms they cause.
When Big Tobacco or Big Food influence governments with donations of food or medical equipment and other high-profile goodwill initiatives, public health efforts to combat NCDs become futile.
The WHO has documented corporations’ contribution to poor health outcomes and rising inequities worldwide. To tackle the NCD pandemic, their influence on policymaking should be strictly regulated.
Governments must fulfill their obligation to protect their citizens from the harmful activities of third parties — including multinational food, beverage and tobacco industries.
Failure to monitor these corporate activities amounts to a violation of their citizens’ fundamental human right to health.
The experience of Big Tobacco offers some insight into how the international community can approach industry interference in public health. Following the adoption of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in 2005, governments around the world recognized that the industry had been engaging in a concerted effort to undermine and subvert efforts to control tobacco, and some nations adopted measures to address the problem.
In light of the tactics corporations have deployed during the COVID-19 pandemic, legal measures must be adopted to de-normalize activities that, masquerading as displays of “social responsibility,” offer short-term benefits to communities that come at the expense of public health.
Governments must not only ensure public awareness of the harms caused by tobacco, alcohol and unhealthy foods; they must also establish measures to limit policymakers’ interactions with these industries.
As WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus put it, “if tobacco was a virus, it would long ago have been called a pandemic and the world would marshal every resource to stop it. Instead, it is a multibillion-dollar business profiting from death and disease.”
His comment applies no less to other products that contribute to NCDs.
Governments must take decisive action to counter the role of the private sector in undermining public health.
Even when corporations step up to help a community, officials should ensure that this aid does not address problems by creating new ones.
Andres Constantin, an associate with the Healthy Families Initiative, is acting assistant director of the health law LL.M. programs at the O’Neill Institute and an adjunct professor of law at Georgetown University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS