State-run Taiwan Power Co’s (Taipower) poor management is sabotaging the government’s efforts to shift away from fossil fuels as large-scale power outages on Sunday again raised concerns about the stability of the nation’s power supply and whether renewable energy from solar and wind farms could fill the void.
Uncertainty about the power grid’s reliability has created an opportunity for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and nuclear power proponents to push for people to vote in favor of restarting construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in a referendum on Saturday. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said the incident reinforced the idea that Taiwan was short of power this year, saying the situation would only deteriorate next year, potentially scaring away foreign investment and damaging the economy.
However, Chu entirely ignored the state-run company’s initial findings. Taipower said that the 15-minute blackouts were not caused by insufficient power supply, but by an equipment malfunction. Wanlong substation’s No. 5 distribution transformer malfunctioned, causing its insulating oil to catch fire and smoke, which led to insulation failure and caused power supply systems to shut down, Taipower spokesman Chang Ting-shu (張廷抒) said.
The substation’s 161 kilovolt (kV) and 69kV power supply systems were shut off, leading to a power outage in some parts of Taipei’s Muzha (木柵) area and New Taipei City’s Sindian District (新店), Taipower said. About 300,000 households and businesses in Taipei and New Taipei City were affected.
Deputy Minister of Economic Affairs Tseng Wen-sheng (曾文生) yesterday said that the nation has sufficient power supply. The operating reserve margin stood at 37.17 percent when the fire broke out. The outage was caused by a transformer breakdown, rather than Taipower’s practice of reducing voltage to boost electricity supply, he said.
However, the ministry’s explanation did not clear up doubts about the power grid’s reliability, nor did it appease those who were affected. Some key questions remain unanswered about why a substation fire could lead to a large-scale blackout, or if human error was involved.
Taipower’s stingy compensation proposal angered those affected yesterday. Based on Taipower’s rules, about 90 percent of affected users would not receive any compensation as the power had only gone out for 15 minutes, while 10 percent would receive a NT$1 refund as the supply resumed within three hours. The ministry has promised to reconsider the compensation.
Taipower yesterday said that it plans to comprehensively examine more than 600 substations nationwide. It said it expects to complete the inspection by tomorrow and fix faulty equipment by the Lunar New Year holiday, which begins on Jan. 29.
People’s patience is wearing thin, not to speak of their trust regarding Taipower’s ability to maintain a stable supply of power. In May, human error caused a major blackout that affected 4.15 million households, followed by large-scale power rationing. A Taipower employee caused a voltage drop that forced the Hsinta Power Plant (興達電廠) to shut down as a protective measure. That does not include the several smaller power outages recorded.
Taipower managers and employees seem to lack the discipline and capability to deal with the nation’s complicated power supply situation, especially as the nation is transitioning toward solar, wind and other renewable energy sources. That adds to the challenges facing President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration as it tries to fulfill its energy policy.
To ensure a smooth transition and bolster grid stability, the Ministry of Economic Affairs should step up its oversight of Taipower’s operations to avoid similar issues. Enhancing employee training, boosting equipment inspections and building effective foolproof mechanisms should be among the top tasks on Taipower’s to-do list.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
RSS