In sentencing Myanmar’s iconic civilian leader Aung San Suu Kyi to prison, the Burmese generals have effectively exiled her from electoral politics, but that does not mean that the Southeast Asian nation is back to square one in its stop-start efforts to move toward democracy.
A younger generation that came of age as the military began loosening its grip and has tasted some freedoms is well-positioned to carry on the struggle.
The Feb. 1 coup ousted Aung San Suu Kyi’s elected government from power, throwing the country into turmoil, but erasing the gains of a decade of opening up has proved more difficult.
Illustration: Yusha
People took to the streets almost immediately and have continued protesting. As a military crackdown on demonstrations grew increasingly violent, protesters moved to arm themselves.
Within days, a mix of old and new guard, including elected lawmakers who were prevented by the takeover from taking their seats, announced a shadow administration that declared itself the nation’s only legitimate government. It was very consciously assembled to be a diverse group, including representatives of ethnic minorities and one openly gay member, unusual in socially conservative Myanmar.
It, not Aung San Suu Kyi — who was arrested in the takeover — has been at the forefront of the opposition, and has garnered significant support among the general population.
While no foreign government has recognized the so-called National Unity Government, US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan has met virtually with two of its representatives and it has accomplished a kind of standoff at the UN, which delayed action on a request by Myanmar’s military government for its representative to take its seat. The country’s existing UN delegate has declared his allegiance to the unity government.
“The coup and its aftermath are not so much the end of a democratization process in Myanmar as they are proof that democratization has actually taken hold of the younger generation,” Priscilla Clapp, a senior adviser to the US Institute of Peace and the Asia Society and a former US chief of mission in Myanmar. “In fact, the coup may ultimately prove to be the dramatic end to the older generation of leadership in Myanmar.”
The democracy movement faces the challenges of continuing to resist military rule, keeping up international pressure for restoring an elected, civilian government, and consolidating support from ethnic groups that have long fought the central government.
Aung San Suu Kyi and her allies have played important roles in the past, even when sidelined or jailed by the generals. On Monday last week, the 76-year-old was convicted on charges of incitement and contraventions of COVID-19 restrictions, and sentenced to four years in prison, although that was reduced to two. She faces other charges that could see her imprisoned for life.
However, the younger generation might be better placed to carry the mantle.
Unlike their elders, younger people in Myanmar, especially those in the cities, have spent most of their lives without having to worry about being imprisoned for speaking their minds. They have had access to mobile phones and Facebook, and grew up believing that the country was becoming more, not less, democratic.
They also seem more willing to reach out to Myanmar’s ethnic minorities.
Not only did the unity government include ethnic minority officials in its Cabinet, but it also sought out alliances with the powerful ethnic militias, which are fighting for autonomy and rights over their resource-rich lands.
“Even as they are fighting against the military takeover, they are debating among themselves to determine the outlines of a new form of a more democratic and ethnically diverse political system,” Clapp said. “This did not happen with earlier rebellions against military rule, before the people had experience with democratic institutions that gave the public a voice.”
Aung San Suu Kyi’s own reputation abroad was deeply marred by her seemingly condoning, or at times even defending, abuses committed by the military against the Muslim Rohingya minority while her government was in power.
She disputes allegations that troops killed Rohingya civilians, torched houses and raped women.
The unity government has also been criticized for seeming to neglect the long-oppressed Rohingya, and it remains to be seen how its uneasy alliance with ethnic groups will play out.
However, Aung San Suu Kyi’s handling of the Rohingya is just one element that complicates her legacy.
An icon of resistance during her 15 years under house arrest, Aung San Suu Kyi agreed to work alongside the generals after she was freed. It was a gamble that left Myanmar’s fledgling democracy in limbo, with the military keeping control of key ministries and reserving a large share of seats in parliament.
Some overseas admirers were disappointed that during its time in power, Aung San Suu Kyi’s government used British colonial-era security laws to prosecute dissidents and critical journalists, in part of “an ongoing pattern of silencing dissent,” Australian National University lecturer Jane Ferguson said.
In seizing power, the military claimed there was massive fraud in the election in November last year, in which Aung San Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy won by a landslide.
The military justified the takeover under a constitution that allows it to seize power in emergencies — although independent election observers did not detect any major irregularities.
Critics also assert that the takeover bypassed the legal process for declaring the kind of emergency that allows the army to step in.
Security forces have since quashed nonviolent nationwide protests with deadly force, killing about 1,300 civilians, according to a tally compiled by the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners.
Despite the risks, the verdict against Aung San Suu Kyi, who remains popular, provoked more spirited protests. In the city of Mandalay on Monday last week, demonstrators chanted slogans and sang songs popularized during pro-democracy protests in 1988.
“In Yangon, we are seeing local residents resume banging pots and pans late at night in protest,” said Jason Tower, Myanmar country director for the US Institute of Peace. “These types of moves by the junta are also a key driver and motivation for local people to join people’s defense forces.”
Those forces, which began as a way to protect neighborhoods and villages from the depredations of government troops, are also being supported by the opposition unity government that hopes to turn them into a federal army one day.
The military keeps trying to “terrorize the public into obedience,” George Washington University international affairs professor Christina Fink said. “They have done so successfully in the past — but this time the opposition is more widespread and takes many different forms, so it has been much harder for the regime to achieve its goal.”
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS