What is next on the global climate agenda? This year’s UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) in Glasgow certainly did not fail, but nor was it much of a success. While world leaders entered into some promising new agreements on targets, global greenhouse-gas emissions so far are not being reduced at the pace we need. While some countries’ climate pledges have been strengthened, the lack of concrete measures for achieving them is a real worry. We still see a yawning policy gap.
Climate science clearly shows that future prosperity and equity lie in only one direction: toward a nature-positive, zero-carbon global economy. Between this year’s extreme weather events and the razor-sharp, science-based messages in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s sixth assessment report, we do not need any more confirmation of the facts. The world is facing massive threats to biodiversity and nature. To remain on track to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050, we must reduce emissions significantly before 2030.
Many policymakers continue to drag their feet, voicing concerns that climate action would burden businesses. However, many top business leaders are increasingly putting their companies on a more sustainability-minded course. The vast majority of them have accepted the findings of climate science and moved beyond the phase of doubt and hesitation. This broader trend was clear to see in Glasgow, where senior executives from many of the world’s largest corporations were in attendance.
In the run-up to COP26, we interviewed business leaders from more than 20 top German companies — including BASF, Daimler, Deutsche Bank, Deutsche Telekom, Lufthansa and Siemens — and examined their respective sustainability strategies. Among our main findings were that nine out of 10 German CEOs consider sustainability to be at least as important as digitalization over the next five years.
This represents a striking change, and it is not just cheap words. On average, the companies participating in the study aim to achieve climate neutrality by as early as 2035, not only on their factory premises but across their global value chains. German corporate leaders are under no illusions that this will be easy; most recognize that their actions have yet to catch up to their attitudes. Nonetheless, sustainability has clearly moved to the top of the CEO agenda, supplanting COVID-19 as the number one topic.
Our survey suggests that a new narrative has emerged in German business. Companies consider a robust sustainability strategy necessary for maintaining their “license to operate.” More are coming to realize that there are business opportunities in sustainability, and more CEOs are taking personal responsibility, establishing new corporate governance mechanisms and incorporating sustainability targets into executive board compensation.
In the context of the broader climate challenge, Germany makes for a particularly interesting case study. With its highly industrialized economy, Germany wants to become a pioneer in decarbonization without losing its international competitiveness.
From the average German CEO’s perspective, progress is being held back not by a lack of green technologies or support from key stakeholders, but by still-high up-front costs. For 60 percent of those surveyed, sustainability and profitability remain at odds. Still, many existing sustainability projects are already paying off, and costs should continue to fall as the opportunities for increasing sales of sustainable products increase.
Transforming companies’ modes of operation requires three kinds of action.
First, they urgently need to reduce their negative footprint on the planet and society, by stopping their overuse and destruction of natural resources.
Second, they need to increase their positive handprint through system-wide, purpose-oriented — rather than solely profit-driven — business strategies to build resilience and contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals.
Third, they need to create a heartprint, winning the support of all stakeholders. Here, we can all have an impact, by changing our behavior as consumers, supporting bold policies as voters, creating new knowledge as scientists, and setting meaningful incentives and frameworks as policymakers.
The German companies we surveyed offer good examples for sustainable corporate action. Some of them use “green digital twins” in product development to quantify a product’s climate effects even before a prototype is built. Others report on their “product carbon footprint” to provide suppliers and customers transparency about emissions and enable informed choices between alternatives. Many businesses cooperate across sectors to operate and finance sustainable projects, and several large German companies are training employees to become “sustainability ambassadors” who can show others how to pursue similar strategies.
Such models need to spread quickly, because the transition to a safer, healthier, sustainable world is not proceeding smoothly. The global economy is still shaped by misaligned incentives that make it profitable to pollute, destroy and destabilize the climate and biosphere. We urgently need policies aligned with climate science that provide a new framework for business. COP26 did not deliver this — and it probably never could. Additional formats will be needed, starting with the next year’s G7 summit in Germany. The EU could sign on to the US-China declaration in Glasgow, even forming a science-based “climate G3.”
However, we also need more companies to take it upon themselves to adopt science-based targets. This applies not only to cutting carbon dioxide emissions but also to conserving other limited resources, especially water, biodiversity, food and soil.
The challenges ahead are immense, but so are the opportunities. We are in a phase of acceleration, having only just realized the urgency of the issue. The carbon budget for remaining aligned with 1.5°C of warming will last, at current emissions rates, until the end of this decade — at most. We must start reducing emissions now, across all sectors and at all levels.
As our study shows, business leaders are aligning behind the science and showing a willingness to transform their operations. The question is whether policymakers will provide the necessary framework to ensure a safe future for everyone.
Johan Rockstrom is director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. Tobias Raffel is co-founder of the FUTURIST Institute for Sustainable Transformation.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
RSS