The fines levied against Far Eastern Group in China continue, with China’s Taiwan Affairs Office saying that the total has reached NT$2 billion (US$71.85 million).
There are two officially sanctioned reasons coming out of Beijing to explain the fines. The first is that the group contravened environmental and fire safety laws. The second is that Taiwanese independence supporters operating in China are guilty of “biting the hand that feeds them.”
Clearly, this is no longer simply a question of how the company has been operating. Beijing is telling Taiwanese firms in China that it is no longer willing to accommodate political transgressions.
With such a presumptuous attack — untethered from a rules-based market — on Taiwanese companies investing in China, political parties in Taiwan should stand as one in the face of this affront from a foreign government.
Unfortunately, in even this most fundamental of tests, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) has been found wanting.
Chu’s “no comment” is more fitting for someone with no skin in the game. His “hope” that companies abide by local laws and regulations is blind to the objective truth of what has happened, and places expectations on Taiwanese companies operating in China far higher than those he places on the Chinese government itself.
His behavior is akin to hitting wayward children for the sake of appeasing unimpressed onlookers.
His stance betrays a lack of courage, political commitment, economic plan, trade policy and cross-strait strategy, not to mention a lack of an ethical command.
China has already said that the Far Eastern case is just an appetizer, so if the KMT cannot get a grip on its chairman, its central command might as well call it a day.
After all, China is now using information about political contributions that are perfectly legal and transparent in Taiwan to settle scores with businesses investing there.
There are few political candidates or parties in Taiwan that are not beneficiaries of political donations. Is the KMT really willing to countenance the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) attempt to exploit Taiwan’s democratic and open system, and lecture Taiwanese enterprises and donors over how they should behave?
The manner in which Chu has addressed this issue — which has already caused a public outcry and incited strong debate within the KMT itself — has brought to light information showing that Chu’s team is in close consultation with China to hold a KMT-CCP forum next month, and that Chu is pushing for a virtual dialogue with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Yang (汪洋) on Dec. 12 or thenabouts.
That Chu is unable or unwilling to speak up for Taiwanese businesses in China to avoid scuppering his own agenda, exposing his own inability to respond to changes, does not bode well for his chances in the 2024 presidential election.
Next month will be busy for China regarding its plans for Taiwan. There is the planned forum, and on Wednesday next week is the annual Taipei-Shanghai forum, followed by the Cross-Strait CEO Summit on Saturday.
These three “united front” programs are part of a series of post-COVID-19-pandemic events China is planning to sow divisions in Taiwan, starting with attacking independence advocates and companies that support them.
Beijing’s intentions are clear.
The Taipei-Shanghai forum, the Cross-Strait CEO Summit and the KMT-CCP forum have become rituals for the CCP to find “old friends” and for Taiwanese to become “fellow travelers.”
Taiwanese will not forget which side of the fence people choose. When the CCP comes down on Taiwanese businesses operating in China using baseless excuses, those who stand up to it will be seen, and those who toady up to the regime will be obvious.
And all eyes are on Chu.
Tzou Jiing-wen is editor-in-chief of the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper).
Translated by Paul Cooper
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
Looking at the state of China’s economy this year, many experts have said that weak domestic demand and insufficient internal consumption might be its Achilles’ heel, with the latter being related to culture and demographics. Since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took office in 2013, he has been combating extravagance and corruption as well as rectifying a bad atmosphere. China expert Stephen Roach said the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) regulatory crackdown has been targeting Chinese tycoons, such as Alibaba Group Holding Ltd founder Jack Ma (馬雲), and opposing what the CCP defines as “excessively extravagant lifestyles,” such as playing too
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use