Oral antiviral pills from Merck & Co and Pfizer Inc have been shown to significantly blunt the worst outcomes of COVID-19 if taken early enough, but doctors warn vaccine-hesitant people not to confuse the benefit of the treatments with prevention afforded by vaccines.
While 72 percent of US adults have received a first shot of COVID-19 vaccine, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation poll, the pace of vaccination has slowed, as political partisanship in the nation divides views on the value and safety of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2.
Vaccine mandates by employers, states and the administration of US President Joe Biden have helped increase vaccinations, but also fueled that controversy.
Some disease experts fear the arrival of oral COVID-19 treatments might further impede vaccination campaigns. Preliminary results of a survey of 3,000 US citizens by the City University of New York (CUNY) School of Public Health suggest the drugs could “hamper the effort to get people vaccinated,” said Scott Ratzan, an expert in health communication at CUNY who led the research.
Ratzan said one out of every eight of those surveyed said they would rather get treated with a pill than be vaccinated.
“That is a high number,” Ratzan said.
The concern follows news on Friday last week from Pfizer, maker of a leading COVID-19 vaccine, that its experimental antiviral pill Paxlovid cut the risk of hospitalization and death from the disease by 89 percent in high-risk adults.
Pfizer’s results followed news on Oct. 1 from Merck and partner Ridgeback Biotherapeutics that their oral antiviral drug cut hospitalization and death by half. That drug, known as molnupiravir, won conditional approval in the UK on Thursday last week. Both need clearance from US health regulators, but could be on the market next month.
“By relying exclusively on an antiviral drug, it’s a bit of a roll of the dice in terms of how you will do. Clearly, it’s going to be better than nothing, but it’s a high-stakes game to play,” said Peter Hotez, a vaccine expert and professor of molecular virology and microbiology at Baylor College of Medicine.
Six infectious disease experts interviewed by Reuters were equally enthusiastic about the prospect of effective new treatments for COVID-19 and agreed they were no substitute for vaccines.
Even in the face of the highly transmissible Delta variant of SARS-CoV-21, the vaccines from Pfizer-BioNTech remain effective, cutting the risk of hospitalization by a combined 86.8 percent, according to a government study of US veterans.
They said that some unvaccinated people have already relied on monoclonal antibodies — drugs that need to be delivered through intravenous IV infusions or injections — as a backstop in case they become infected.
“I think the Pfizer news is terrific news. It goes hand in hand with vaccination. It doesn’t replace it,” said Leana Wen, an emergency physician and public health professor at George Washington University and Baltimore’s former health commissioner.
Choosing not to get vaccinated “would be a tragic mistake,” Pfizer chief executive officer Albert Bourla said.
“These are treatments. This is for the unfortunate who will get sick,” Bourla said in an interview on Friday last week. “This should not be a reason not to protect yourself and to put yourself, your household and society in danger.”
Experts said that one main reason not to rely on the new pills is that antiviral medications, which stop the virus from replicating in the body, must be given in a narrow window early in the disease because COVID-19 has different phases.
In the first phase, the virus rapidly replicates in the body. However, a lot of the worst effects of COVID-19 occur in the second phase, arising from a defective immune response that gets triggered by the replicating virus, said Celine Gounder, an infectious disease expert and the CEO and founder of Just Human Productions, a non-profit multimedia organization.
“Once you develop shortness of breath or other symptoms that would lead you to be hospitalized, you are in that dysfunctional immune phase where the antivirals are really not going to provide much benefit,” she said.
Hotez agreed. He said getting treated early enough could be challenging, because the window when the virus transitions from the replication phase to the inflammatory phase is fluid.
“For some people, that will happen earlier; for some, later,” Hotez said.
Many people in the early phase of the illness feel surprisingly well and might be unaware that their oxygen levels are dropping, one of the first signs that the inflammatory phase of the disease has started, he said.
“Oftentimes, you’re not going to realize that you’re getting sick until it’s too late,” he said.
Additional reporting by Josephine Mason, Deena Beasley and Manojna Maddipatla
Lockheed Martin on Tuesday responded to concerns over delayed shipments of F-16V Block 70 jets, saying it had added extra shifts on its production lines to accelerate progress. The Ministry of National Defense on Monday said that delivery of all 66 F-16V Block 70 jets — originally expected by the end of next year — would be pushed back due to production line relocations and global supply chain disruptions. Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) said that Taiwan and the US are working to resolve the delays, adding that 50 of the aircraft are in production, with 10 scheduled for flight
Victory in conflict requires mastery of two “balances”: First, the balance of power, and second, the balance of error, or making sure that you do not make the most mistakes, thus helping your enemy’s victory. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a decisive and potentially fatal error by making an enemy of the Jewish Nation, centered today in the State of Israel but historically one of the great civilizations extending back at least 3,000 years. Mind you, no Israeli leader has ever publicly declared that “China is our enemy,” but on October 28, 2025, self-described Chinese People’s Armed Police (PAP) propaganda
Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday last week shared a news article on social media about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan, adding that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The previous day in the Japanese House of Representatives, Takaichi said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival,” a reference to a legal legal term introduced in 2015 that allows the prime minister to deploy the Japan Self-Defense Forces. The violent nature of Xue’s comments is notable in that it came from a diplomat,
China’s third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, entered service this week after a commissioning ceremony in China’s Hainan Province on Wednesday last week. Chinese state media reported that the Fujian would be deployed to the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea and the western Pacific. It seemed that the Taiwan Strait being one of its priorities meant greater military pressure on Taiwan, but it would actually put the Fujian at greater risk of being compromised. If the carrier were to leave its home port of Sanya and sail to the East China Sea or the Yellow Sea, it would have to transit the