In 2019, scientists working for South Africa’s government completed a study on the health repercussions of pollution from the country’s sprawling coal industry.
The researchers for the state-owned Council for Scientific and Industrial Research had been assured by government authorities that their years-long study would be published, three people familiar with the matter said.
So far, it has not seen the light of day.
Illustration: Yusha
The study, a copy of which was reviewed by Reuters, showed more than 5,000 South Africans die annually in the nation’s coal belt because the government has failed to fully enforce its own air quality standards. It also revealed that nearly a quarter of households in the region, where 3.6 million people live, have children with persistent asthma. That is double the national rate.
South Africa’s government has since 2015 granted waivers from emissions limits to its indebted state power and fuel companies, Eskom and Sasol, allowing them to save money.
That kind of continuing government support highlights an issue in many coal-dependent nations, from Australia to Indonesia, that is hobbling the transition to cleaner energy. In producing countries, governments, businesses and local residents often see coal as an economic lifeline.
South Africa’s coal industry, the world’s fifth-largest, employs 90,000 miners, generates 80 percent of the country’s electricity, and supplies the feedstock for about a quarter of the country’s liquid fuel for vehicles, all at a time of soaring unemployment and frequent blackouts.
The costs of a mammoth coal industry are also high, and not just for the climate. South Africa’s coal belt is blanketed in smog and coal ash; the stink of sulfur pervades. The area east of Johannesburg is among the world’s most polluted, experts have said, rivaling Beijing and New Delhi.
In 2017, British air pollution expert Mike Holland calculated that the health impacts from Eskom’s emissions alone cost South Africa US$2.37 billion every year.
South African Minister of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries Barbara Creecy, whose department commissioned the 2019 coal health study, did not say why it remains unpublished. She said the government still intends to release it at some point.
“We understand that there are serious health challenges facing communities,” she said, adding that the government considers improving air quality “absolutely imperative.”
Yet Creecy’s department has publicly defended its lax enforcement of pollution regulations as an economic necessity in court battles with activists. In a recent filing, it said its main challenge is addressing pollution without hurting “the poor, who are desperate for job opportunities.”
TARGETING COAL
As the UN’s climate conference, COP26, got under way in Glasgow this month, coal is in the crosshairs of a global push to replace it with cleaner fuels.
South Africa is the world’s 12th-largest greenhouse gas emitter, the non-profit Global Carbon Atlas said. This water-stressed country also stands to be one of the big losers from climate change. Temperatures in southern Africa are rising twice as fast as the global average, pushing the region’s northwestern deserts south, the International Panel on Climate Change said.
In an effort to secure foreign investment, Eskom is pitching a US$10 billion plan to shut most of its coal-fired plants by 2050 and embrace renewables such as wind and solar, with financing from wealthy nations. The US, Britain, France, Germany and the EU on Tuesday last week provided that effort a big boost, offering US$8.5 billion to help South Africa transition off coal.
Eskom’s green push, however, has put the company in conflict with South African Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe, who has called ditching coal “economic suicide.”
Mantashe represents a powerful constituency within the ruling ANC that includes workers’ unions on whose support the party depends to win elections. Those unions are concerned, as Mantashe is, about job losses.
“We should not collapse our economy because they are greedy for green funding,” Mantashe told a South African mining conference last month. He has previously said switching off the nation’s coal plants would allow South Africans to “breathe fresh air in the darkness.”
Darkness is already a familiar experience in the coal belt. Power cuts are a daily reality for the shanties threaded between the mine shafts and cooling towers of towns such as Emalahleni — “The Place of Coal” in the Zulu language.
If people stay, it is for the chance of a job.
RASPING CHESTS
Mbali Matabule and her partner were senior-high school students when they swapped phone numbers on a dirt track in Vosman, a township outside Emalahleni. After graduation, her partner found work in Sasol’s Secunda plant, which transforms coal into liquid fuel for cars. The following year, Matabule gave birth to their first child, Princess.
His salary allowed them to feed and clothe their daughter and buy the trappings of middle-class life: a TV, microwave, fridge and electric cooker to put in their shack at her parents’ compound.
Then, in May 2018, as Princess approached her fourth birthday, she began struggling to breathe. They rushed her to the hospital, where a doctor put a mask on Princess’s face attached to a nebulizer.
“They said she had asthma,” Matabule said. “I was thinking: Why? She was not born with asthma.”
Toward the end of that year, they had a second child, Asemahle, who soon also developed breathing problems.
“Her chest was rasping” also, Matabule said.
Hospital visits became routine, and the medical costs started to mount. Without health insurance, the couple was spending 2,500 rand (US$166) a month on medical bills for their kids, nearly half Mbali’s partner’s salary.
SICK AND DYING
Smog released from burning coal is laced with chemicals such as sulfur and nitrogen oxides, mercury and lead, and radioactive elements such as uranium and thorium.
“We know air pollution from coal causes lung problems, cardiac diseases. It impairs cognitive development of children,” said Mohammed Tayob, a doctor in Middleberg, one of the worst affected towns in the coal belt.
The leaked 2019 study obtained by Reuters concluded that 5,125 lives could be saved every year in the coal belt by enforcing national air quality standards on soot, otherwise known as particulate matter.
The air in Emalahleni, it said, contains around 20 percent more particulate matter than the nation’s limit of 40 micrograms per cubic meter, and more than three times more than recommended by the WHO.
The region’s sulfur dioxide levels, meanwhile, are off the charts. The nonprofit Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air this month found Eskom alone emits more sulfur dioxide than the entire power sector of the US and China combined.
Clearing the air would require a crackdown on polluting industries.
Eskom environmental manager Deidre Herbst said that the government waivers allowing his company to exceed pollution limits were an economic necessity. It would cost 300 billion rand and take 10 to 15 years to fully meet national sulfur dioxide standards, leading to prolonged outages in the meantime.
“It’s impossible for us to become immediately compliant,” she said, and South Africa cannot simply switch off all its coal plants.
Sasol spokesperson Matebelo Motloung said the company’s emissions were permitted under its operating licenses and that the company hoped to embrace cleaner technologies in the future.
Matabule had not imagined the haze in her neighborhood was behind her children’s illness until she attended a local meeting about air pollution and heard her neighbors’ stories.
“I became so angry because nobody was doing anything, and people were sick and dying,” Matabule said.
However, like her husband who relies on coal for a paycheck, many in her community are wary of a transition to cleaner energy.
Vosman resident Valentia Msiza, 33, said her family has done well since her husband got his job in the coal mines. They worry that a transition could leave them behind.
They also have a child with respiratory problems — and they cannot pay for his care without his salary and health insurance. The family is seeking a medical specialist to treat their toddler’s lung disease.
“That’s our last hope now,” Msiza said.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under