The combined effects of COVID-19 and climate change have revealed profound vulnerabilities in Southeast Asia. In ASEAN member states, the COVID-19 pandemic turned hospitals into mortuaries at the same time as natural disasters transformed coastal communities into washed-out mud flats.
To improve regional resilience and promote sustainable growth, the post-COVID-19 recovery must focus not only on decarbonization, but also on the protection of nature.
Throughout the region, nature remains in a policy silo, and the importance of biodiversity, in particular, rarely features prominently in economic development plans.
Biodiversity provides food, water, shelter and medicine. It contributes to social cohesion and climate stabilization, and can help humanity adapt to a changing environment.
And yet the ASEAN Comprehensive Recovery Framework mentions biodiversity only once — in a footnote. Unless this approach changes, ASEAN member states risk sinking billions of development dollars into measures that fail to address a root cause of the problems.
To lead our region toward recovery, resilience, and long-term sustainable development, ASEAN member states should commit to the “30x30” plan to protect nature.
This initiative, which aims to conserve 30 percent of Earth’s lands and oceans by 2030, is a key element of the proposed global biodiversity framework, due to be finalized by 196 countries later this year, and is championed by the High Ambition Coalition of Nature and People.
More than 70 countries have signed on to the coalition, but Cambodia is the only ASEAN member state among them.
Southeast Asia comprises just 3 percent of Earth’s land mass, but it contains almost 20 percent of the world’s biodiversity. More than 2,000 species have been discovered in the ASEAN region over the past 20 years, and three member states — Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines — are considered “megadiverse” countries, with a variety of species akin to that of the Amazon rainforest and the Congo Basin.
The region contains about 60 percent of the world’s tropical peatlands, and has the world’s most extensive and diverse coral reefs, accounting for 28 percent of the global total.
The Coral Triangle is a global hub of marine biodiversity.
Although ASEAN countries have taken steps to protect this natural patrimony, including creating the ASEAN Heritage Parks and marine protected areas, risks are mounting.
In 2017, the ASEAN Center for Biodiversity reported that the region is poised to lose 70 to 90 percent of habitats and 13 to 42 percent of species by 2100.
Some of this loss can be attributed to climate change, but the infrastructure to support population growth also poses a serious threat.
The population of the ASEAN region has increased 72 percent between 1980 and 2017. Clearing areas for agriculture and housing development has caused habitat fragmentation, and logging and mining operations continue to encroach on wilderness areas at a rapid rate. As ASEAN’s Biodiversity Outlook 2 noted: “The productivity and viability of the region’s lakes, rivers, and peatlands continue to decline.”
The report further said that while “coastal and marine areas are … primary food sources for millions of residents in the region … studies show that most of the region’s seas are overfished and degraded, threatening marine health and food security.”
Perhaps we do not fully appreciate the value of this biodiversity to our own development, and perhaps we also do not appreciate the role we can play in preserving it.
By embracing the 30x30 initiative, ASEAN members could drive new sources of sustainable finance into conservation measures that connect ecological corridors along watersheds and integrated seascapes. These corridors could be established across borders to protect vital concentrations of species in carbon-rich forests and peatlands, coral reefs, and deep seabeds.
We could empower indigenous peoples and local communities as guardians of still-intact, but dwindling natural areas. This would counter the regional trend toward widening inequality and honor these true stewards of nature with the respect — and the rights — they deserve.
In my home country of the Philippines, it took six years to secure protected status for one tract of critical habitat on Palawan Island known as Cleopatra’s Needle.
To make our case, we documented every centimeter of land and every species from soil to sky. We worked closely with the Batak people, who have lived sustainably on that land for centuries.
This example can serve as a model for what is possible, but the process must be faster to protect 30 percent of the Earth’s critical habitat and thereby ensure the continuity of life on the other 70 percent.
Another case from the Philippines demonstrates how conserving nature can provide benefits when disaster strikes.
The Pilar Municipal Marine Park was established in 2005, and after four years of vigilant management, the area’s decimated fish populations had rebounded. They spilled over into adjacent waters, where local residents use traditional fishing methods. The marine park helped stave off hunger when Typhoon Haiyan struck in 2013 and cut the community off from food aid.
The fish were still thriving when COVID-19 hit and lockdowns disrupted food supply chains.
The pandemic has revealed the deep connections between nature, disaster and development, and protecting biodiversity must be part of the post-pandemic economic recovery. Given the high stakes for the ASEAN region, we have a key role to play in this process, leading the drive for 30x30 as part of the High Ambition Coalition.
Tony La Vina is associate director for climate policy and international relations at the Manila Observatory.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry