The combined effects of COVID-19 and climate change have revealed profound vulnerabilities in Southeast Asia. In ASEAN member states, the COVID-19 pandemic turned hospitals into mortuaries at the same time as natural disasters transformed coastal communities into washed-out mud flats.
To improve regional resilience and promote sustainable growth, the post-COVID-19 recovery must focus not only on decarbonization, but also on the protection of nature.
Throughout the region, nature remains in a policy silo, and the importance of biodiversity, in particular, rarely features prominently in economic development plans.
Biodiversity provides food, water, shelter and medicine. It contributes to social cohesion and climate stabilization, and can help humanity adapt to a changing environment.
And yet the ASEAN Comprehensive Recovery Framework mentions biodiversity only once — in a footnote. Unless this approach changes, ASEAN member states risk sinking billions of development dollars into measures that fail to address a root cause of the problems.
To lead our region toward recovery, resilience, and long-term sustainable development, ASEAN member states should commit to the “30x30” plan to protect nature.
This initiative, which aims to conserve 30 percent of Earth’s lands and oceans by 2030, is a key element of the proposed global biodiversity framework, due to be finalized by 196 countries later this year, and is championed by the High Ambition Coalition of Nature and People.
More than 70 countries have signed on to the coalition, but Cambodia is the only ASEAN member state among them.
Southeast Asia comprises just 3 percent of Earth’s land mass, but it contains almost 20 percent of the world’s biodiversity. More than 2,000 species have been discovered in the ASEAN region over the past 20 years, and three member states — Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines — are considered “megadiverse” countries, with a variety of species akin to that of the Amazon rainforest and the Congo Basin.
The region contains about 60 percent of the world’s tropical peatlands, and has the world’s most extensive and diverse coral reefs, accounting for 28 percent of the global total.
The Coral Triangle is a global hub of marine biodiversity.
Although ASEAN countries have taken steps to protect this natural patrimony, including creating the ASEAN Heritage Parks and marine protected areas, risks are mounting.
In 2017, the ASEAN Center for Biodiversity reported that the region is poised to lose 70 to 90 percent of habitats and 13 to 42 percent of species by 2100.
Some of this loss can be attributed to climate change, but the infrastructure to support population growth also poses a serious threat.
The population of the ASEAN region has increased 72 percent between 1980 and 2017. Clearing areas for agriculture and housing development has caused habitat fragmentation, and logging and mining operations continue to encroach on wilderness areas at a rapid rate. As ASEAN’s Biodiversity Outlook 2 noted: “The productivity and viability of the region’s lakes, rivers, and peatlands continue to decline.”
The report further said that while “coastal and marine areas are … primary food sources for millions of residents in the region … studies show that most of the region’s seas are overfished and degraded, threatening marine health and food security.”
Perhaps we do not fully appreciate the value of this biodiversity to our own development, and perhaps we also do not appreciate the role we can play in preserving it.
By embracing the 30x30 initiative, ASEAN members could drive new sources of sustainable finance into conservation measures that connect ecological corridors along watersheds and integrated seascapes. These corridors could be established across borders to protect vital concentrations of species in carbon-rich forests and peatlands, coral reefs, and deep seabeds.
We could empower indigenous peoples and local communities as guardians of still-intact, but dwindling natural areas. This would counter the regional trend toward widening inequality and honor these true stewards of nature with the respect — and the rights — they deserve.
In my home country of the Philippines, it took six years to secure protected status for one tract of critical habitat on Palawan Island known as Cleopatra’s Needle.
To make our case, we documented every centimeter of land and every species from soil to sky. We worked closely with the Batak people, who have lived sustainably on that land for centuries.
This example can serve as a model for what is possible, but the process must be faster to protect 30 percent of the Earth’s critical habitat and thereby ensure the continuity of life on the other 70 percent.
Another case from the Philippines demonstrates how conserving nature can provide benefits when disaster strikes.
The Pilar Municipal Marine Park was established in 2005, and after four years of vigilant management, the area’s decimated fish populations had rebounded. They spilled over into adjacent waters, where local residents use traditional fishing methods. The marine park helped stave off hunger when Typhoon Haiyan struck in 2013 and cut the community off from food aid.
The fish were still thriving when COVID-19 hit and lockdowns disrupted food supply chains.
The pandemic has revealed the deep connections between nature, disaster and development, and protecting biodiversity must be part of the post-pandemic economic recovery. Given the high stakes for the ASEAN region, we have a key role to play in this process, leading the drive for 30x30 as part of the High Ambition Coalition.
Tony La Vina is associate director for climate policy and international relations at the Manila Observatory.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Liberal democracy and communist autocracy are at the initial stages of a historic battle. Taipei has chosen its side in this fight and has sought to frame “cross-strait relations” as an international issue, while Beijing says that Taiwan is an “internal issue” and a hangover from the Chinese Civil War. Taiwan’s status as a nation has new clarity and the international community is beginning to defend Taiwan’s democracy. The Washington Post has praised Taiwan’s diplomatic achievements and Australian Minister for Defence Peter Dutton has said that it would be inconceivable for Australia not to join Taiwan and the US in a conflict with
Thanks to the communist side of the Strait, awareness of the threats facing Taiwan is higher than at any time in the last 50 years. It’s an opportunity to educate the world about all the country has to offer, from public health and disaster relief to entrepreneurship and democratic governance. One of Taiwan’s greatest strengths — its semiconductor industry — however, is also potentially a terrible political liability. Taipei and friends of Taiwan should be careful how they wield it. The idea that China could shut down large swaths of the global economy with an attack on the center of 60%
At a time when China continues its assertive policy toward its neighboring countries, the regime of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Bhutan last month to resolve a longstanding border dispute. However, this is not the first time China and Bhutan have taken such efforts on this issue. Over the years, China has expanded its claim over territory in Bhutan. China claims over 764km2 of Bhutan’s territory, which includes Doklam, Sinchulung, Dramana and Shakhatoe in the northwestern region and the Pasamlung and Jakarlung Valleys in the central part of Bhutan. Although the two sides held
The world community has just seen an election victory with more than 90 percent of the vote under a dictatorial regime, but Dolqun Isa’s large election win was for a good reason. The World Uyghur Congress’ (WUC) 7th General Assembly was held in Prague, Czech Republic, from Nov. 12 to Nov. 14. The WUC was formed in exile to re-establish the independent state in East Turkestan — officially called Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region by China. At that meeting, Isa was re-elected to the presidency. He was the only candidate, and before the vote, another well-known Uighur advocate, Abduwali Ayup, said: “Are we living