An unprecedented election pledge by Japan’s ruling party to double defense spending underscores the nation’s haste to acquire missiles, stealth fighters, drones and other weapons to deter China’s military in the disputed East China Sea.
The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) included the goal of spending 2 percent of GDP — about US$100 billion — or more on the Japanese military for the first time in its policy platform ahead of a national election this month.
Experts do not expect newly elected Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida to double spending any time soon, given the country’s debt-saddled public finances and COVID-19 pandemic-stricken economy.
However, it is a sign that the pacifist nation could over time abandon a commitment to keep military budgets within 1 percent of GDP — a number that has for decades eased concern at home and abroad about any revival of the militarism that led Japan into World War II.
“LDP conservative leaders want the party to give it up,” said Yoichiro Sato, an international relations professor at Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University, referring to the de facto spending cap, which he called “sacrosanct for Japanese liberals.”
“They are setting the direction, that is what conservatives want to do,” he added.
The US has been pushing key allies to spend more on defense, and an increase to 2 percent of GDP would put Japan in line with pledges by NATO members.
The hawkish notes from the LDP come as Japanese public sentiment shifts away from concerns about rearming to growing alarm over China’s military assertiveness in the Asia-Pacific region, particularly toward Taiwan.
In a survey of 1,696 people conducted by the Nikkei Business Daily at the end of last year, 86 percent of respondents said that China posed a threat to Japan, more than the 82 percent who expressed concern about nuclear-armed North Korea.
“Putting this in the manifesto is a recognition of the need to garner public support for required defense policy changes,” said Robert Ward, a London-based researcher at the International Institute for Strategic Studies. “The direction of travel is now set.”
Japan’s military strategy is focused on defending territory along the edge of the East China Sea, where Tokyo is locked in a dispute with Beijing over a group of uninhabited islands.
The Okinawa Islands, Taiwan and islands stretching down through the Philippines form what military planners dub the first island chain, a natural barrier to Chinese operations in the Western Pacific.
With an additional US$50 billion a year, Japan could buy more US equipment, including F-35 stealth fighters, Osprey tilt-rotor utility aircraft and surveillance drones, as well as domestically made equipment such as amphibious landing craft, compact warships, aircraft carriers, submarines, satellites and communications gear to fight a protracted war.
The Japanese military is “well trained and well equipped, but its sustainability and resilience is one of the most serious problems,” former Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force Admiral and Fleet Commander Yoji Koda said.
The Japanese Ministry of Defense also wants money for an indigenous stealth fighter and missiles that can strike enemy ships and land bases more than 1,000km away. The country is also building up cyber, space and electromagnetic warfare capabilities.
“Japan wants to acquire very sophisticated capabilities in a variety of areas,” BAE Systems PLC Japan manager Thomas Reich told a briefing on Tuesday. “What’s in the budget and where it’s going are the things that really attract us.”
The UK’s biggest defense company is part of a consortium led by Lockheed Martin that builds the F-35 fighter.
The speed at which once-dovish Kishida has fallen in line with the national security agenda of conservatives has surprised some observers, but he is carrying on policies pursued by former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe and supported by conservative Japanese lawmakers who helped him win the party leadership election last month.
By pursuing a policy of similar small steps, Abe enacted security laws to allow Japanese troops to fight on foreign soil, ended a ban on military exports and reinterpreted the country’s war-renouncing constitution to allow missile strikes on enemy territory.
For now, however, the LDP defense spending pledge does not say how any extra money would be spent or indicate when the 2 percent goal would be reached.
“The real question is whether Japan can absorb another US$50 billion in a way that measurably improves Japan’s defense,” said Chuck Jones, a former defense sector executive familiar with Japan’s military policy. “The concern is that large sums will be wasted on programs and projects doomed to failure or irrelevance.”
The lack of detail gives the party room to alter course, analysts say.
“There is opposition even inside the LDP,” said Tetsuo Kotani, a senior research fellow at the Japan Institute of International Affairs. “We are going to have an election, and we will see if the general public supports the LDP’s proposal.”
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under