Every few days, after finishing his online college classes, Chai*, 19, prepares to join protests in Bangkok. He takes a bandana to cover his face, material to obscure his motorbike license plate, a helmet and often a ping pong bomb.
The homemade device, in which stones are wrapped up with firework powder, will either be thrown at police as a provocation or used as a distraction when he and his friends are being chased by officers.
“We don’t have a choice, we have to come out; my family is suffering,” Chai said.
As he speaks, the banging of fireworks and ping pong bombs echoes from a nearby underpass. Clouds of black smoke rise from burning tires further along the roadside.
He is at Din Daeng intersection, the site of a leaderless uprising by teenagers calling for action on a host of issues ranging from democratic reforms to COVID-19.
For more than one month, the area has turned into a battleground with nightly clashes taking place between young protesters, mostly students from vocational colleges and poorer neighborhoods, and the police, who routinely fire rubber bullets and tear gas.
Chai’s mother and father, a food seller and an electrician respectively, have both lost work because of the pandemic. Chai said he has also been forced to give up his part-time job because his college course has been moved online and now does not finish until later in the day. He is training to be an electrician, but is on the brink of dropping out. One of his friends, who leans in to talk, has already done so. They are struggling to learn from home, and say there has been no support to cover the Internet costs.
“Everything has culminated, everything has exploded now during COVID,” Chai said. “The economic situation and the government’s management of public funding cannot be tolerated any longer.”
Last year, tens of thousands of young people took to the streets across Thailand to call for democratic reforms aimed at making the establishment more accountable and society more equal. The protests, led mostly by university students, said that the power and wealth of the monarchy should be curbed, that Thai Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha, a former army general who first came to power in a coup should resign, and that the constitution, drafted by army appointees, should be reformed.
The message was serious, but the rallies were peaceful, and often had a festive atmosphere, with playful protest art and even satirical dress.
None of the protesters’ demands have been met. Instead, more than 1,000 people face legal charges for political activities, including at least 132 for lese-majeste, which can lead to 15 years in prison. Key protest leaders have been repeatedly denied bail.
At Din Daeng, protesters say they have run out of patience.
“It’s as if they look at us not like a citizen, it’s as if they see us as slaves,” said Chai’s friend, who is 17.
Two of his family members, his aunt and uncle, died after becoming infected with COVID-19.
“They don’t have connections, so they had to wait and wait [for a hospital space],” he said.
One of them died at home, before getting proper treatment. Like Chai, his family is struggling financially. His mother used to work in a school canteen, but it has closed. She is selling street food instead, and making less money.
Though Thailand managed to contain COVID-19 throughout last year, it has experienced its most severe wave over recent months, after cases spread quickly through slum housing, factories and prisons. The vaccination process has been slow and chaotic. Those who could afford it resorted to flying abroad for vaccines; those who cannot are left to wait their turn. Chai’s father has been vaccinated, but his mother has yet to receive a jab.
Before COVID-19, vocational students were more likely to fight over college rivalries than stand shoulder-to-shoulder, Chai and his friends said. Now they are united in opposition to Prayuth. Before gathering, they scout to see where police checkpoints have been set up, and plan possible escape routes. Their motto is “come together, go back together.”
Their demands remain the same as those proposed by protesters last year.
“If Prayuth would resign, maybe everything could be better,” one of the teenagers said.
Some criticize the protesters for engaging in clashes with the police, saying they are causing trouble, risk undermining wider protests or legitimizing the use of force by the authorities.
While both protesters and police have sustained injuries, rights groups have said that police force is excessive and ndiscriminate. Earlier this month 13 organizations wrote to the prime minister to express concern about the police response.
Videos circulated on social media appear to show police firing rubber bullets at protesters on motorbikes, including at close range. In one clip, a police van hits a protester, who falls to the floor, before driving off; police later said the van was being pursued by protesters.
In a separate incident, three teenagers were last month shot with live ammunition, with one boy left in a coma.
The police say their use of force is in line with the law, and has denied using live ammunition.
“Many of them lost their parents because of COVID,” said Prajak Kongkirati, a professor in the department of political science at Thammasat University.
The confrontational tactics of protesters are driven by anger and frustration at the lack of reforms, the leaderless nature of gatherings, and, in some cases, a belief that by provoking the police they will “show how brutal the police and current regime is,” he said.
“They see the police as part of the system that suppresses them and their family,” he said.
Attitudes toward Thailand’s youth protests, which have broken a deeply held taboo by calling for monarchy reform, are polarized.
Protesters say some residents in Din Daeng have offered shelter and protected them from the police; others have apparently reported them to the authorities. Some are simply fed up with the noisy clashes, and consequent damage to properties.
Many sections of the Thai public, even if not approving of their tactics, are increasingly sympathetic, as more is known about the protesters and their backgrounds, Prajak said.
“They are below 18 years old, some of them are only 13 or 14? Many of them lost their parents because of COVID, many of their parents lost their jobs, so they had to quit education,” he said.
The COVID-19 outbreak caused a lull in mass protests that gripped Thailand last year, but rallies have increased in the past few weeks. Former red shirt leaders have led “car mobs,” with protesters gathering in their cars and on motorbikes, to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission.
Even members of the elite, including Tanat Thanakitamnuay, previously an ultra-Royalist, have backed calls for political change. At a protest last month, he lost sight in his right eye after being hit by an object believed to be a tear gas canister.
Punchada Sirivunnabood, a visiting fellow at Singapore’s ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, said there is a “high potential for big protests after the COVID situation becomes better.”
The government faces a dilemma over whether to lift restrictions, Prajak added.
The protests at Din Daeng remain small, but reopening the country could lead to far larger numbers of young people to take to the streets.
“Their ideology hasn’t changed, their commitment to political struggle hasn’t changed,” he said.
Chai said he would continue protesting until the government is dissolved. Police violence will not deter him, or his friends.
“It will even spark us to go out, we will get even more angry,” he said. “It’s going to be like this until Prayuth gets out.”
*Name has been changed to protect their identity
Additional reporting by Navaon Siradapuvadol
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry