Last month, astronauts from Europe, Japan, Russia and the US held a pizza party in orbit aboard the International Space Station, celebrating the birthday of one of their number.
However, the era of multinational cooperation in orbit is fast drawing to a close — replaced by a new spirit of international rivalry and “great power” competition.
This summer has seen a significant worsening in relations between US space agency NASA and Russian counterpart Roscosmos, increasingly conducted through the media. On Aug. 12, Russian state news agency TASS carried a report accusing a US astronaut of deliberately sabotaging the International Space Station, a story swiftly denied by NASA.
China — functionally banned from cooperating with the International Space Station and NASA by a 2011 US congressional edict, the Wolf Amendment — is pushing rapidly ahead with its own space station in low Earth orbit, with three Chinese astronauts on a multi-week orbital mission including space walks that are to conclude this month.
Russia and China have signed a memorandum to work together on a moon base, although the dates for any such mission remain unclear. NASA’s Artemis 1 — its largest rocket since the Apollo program — is to blast off later this year to test the systems the US hopes will send its astronauts back to the moon by 2023, another sign of a new Cold War-style space race.
However, compared with that historic rivalry, the new competition in space is much more complex. It includes many more players, among them private companies, and ranges from electronic warfare and anti-satellite weapons in low Earth orbit to what might be the early stages of a battle to colonize the solar system, particularly Mars.
In near Earth orbit, experts say that multiple countries are taking a new interest in the potential military use of space, founding organizations such as the US Space Force. In July last year, the US and Britain accused Russia of testing an anti-satellite weapon after a Russian satellite approached close to a US counterpart.
Washington and its Western allies have long argued against the military use of space, warning that incidents such as the 2007 destruction of a defunct Chinese satellite by a rocket fired from Earth risk creating potentially catastrophic levels of space debris.
However, US media recently reported that the US was now considering declassifying its own anti-satellite capabilities, a sign that Washington might now believe an arms race cannot be avoided.
The US and China have sent and operated probes to Mars this year, with China’s Zhurong (祝融號) rover operating there continuously for the past three months. The more sophisticated NASA Perseverance has been active since February, including deploying a small experimental helicopter. Both were presented as reconnaissance for long-term crewed missions, although these might be decades away.
China in particular has much longer-term goals. Last week, state-run media highlighted a report from the National Natural Science Foundation of China calling for Beijing to explore the manufacture of vast space platforms, assembled in orbit and 1km or more in length — 10 times the size of the International Space Station.
Such a feat would require overcoming massive technical challenges, Chinese scientists were reported as saying — but studying the feasibility of the project is set to be part of Beijing’s 2021 to 2025 economic plan.
China’s current space station might find itself the only crewed platform in orbit if the International Space Station cannot be extended until 2030 as the US hopes.
Russia last week said that one of its modules on the station was showing cracks that would worsen and has warned of a potential avalanche of equipment failures as soon as 2025.
While the US has signed agreements with European and Asian allies to cooperate on its Artemis program, China is also reaching out to other nations, particularly developing countries, and might extend collaboration to Russia as part of its broader growing partnership with Moscow.
US and Russian space authorities and media have been in a growing war of words in the past few months.
In July, several US media firms, including the Daily Beast and tech site Ars Technica, ran stories questioning the competence of Russia’s space program after rockets on a Russian module activated, apparently spontaneously, shortly after its arrival at the station.
The US was left dependent on Russia to get astronauts to and from the International Space Station following the termination of its space shuttle program in 2011, but last year resumed its own crewed spaceflight.
Relations have since deteriorated further, even as Moscow has moved closer to other emerging space powers such as India and the United Arab Emirates, hosting training for astronauts of both.
These alliances are important — another reason that Washington is striking its own deals with allies such as the UK, Japan and European powers to join in with Artemis. The international battle for control of space is only just beginning and there is little appetite to be on the losing side.
Peter Apps is a writer on international affairs, globalization, conflict and other issues. He is the founder and executive director of the Project for Study of the 21st Century, a non-national, non-partisan, non-ideological think tank.
On Aug. 27, the Executive Yuan announced that it would make cannabis the main target in the government’s fight against drugs and adopt three major strategies to tackle it. The authorities are to be commended for their determination to deal with the problem. Cannabis users are by no means few in number. Many of them have high social status or returned to Taiwan after studying overseas, and most of them started smoking cannabis while at university. Many think that cannabis is no more harmful to health than tobacco, so they think it should be tolerated as it has been in the Netherlands,
For China observers, especially those in Taiwan, the past decade has brought awareness of an increasing obsession by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) with control. It seeks to control not simply national policy, but all aspects of its citizens’ lives. Not a week passes without some new aspect of Chinese life being brought under CCP control. This forces obvious questions: Why this obsession? And what is driving it? When any one-party state, which already controls government, yet seeks to expand and tighten that control, it bodes ill. With a country the size of China, it bodes ill for Taiwan, Asia and the
Taiwan is now entering a period of maximum danger from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) due to an accelerating Chinese military challenge now emboldened by a shocking dive in American strategic credibility occasioned by its humiliating withdrawal from Afghanistan. This means there is a much higher chance that in the next one to three years CCP leader Xi Jinping (習近平) may order the PLA to invade Taiwan because he believes the PLA can win and that the Americans can be dissuaded from coming to Taiwan’s aid in time. It is still possible for Taiwan and Washington
Another year, and another UN General Assembly is convening without Taiwan. Today marks the opening of the assembly’s 76th session at the UN headquarters in New York City, with the option to attend remotely because of the COVID-19 pandemic, which once again promises to be its main focus under the theme “Building resilience through hope.” As they do every year, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and overseas compatriot groups are organizing campaigns to call for Taiwan’s participation in the global body. However, unlike previous years, Taiwan seems to be riding a higher wave of support than usual. The pandemic has exposed countless shortcomings