Last month, astronauts from Europe, Japan, Russia and the US held a pizza party in orbit aboard the International Space Station, celebrating the birthday of one of their number.
However, the era of multinational cooperation in orbit is fast drawing to a close — replaced by a new spirit of international rivalry and “great power” competition.
This summer has seen a significant worsening in relations between US space agency NASA and Russian counterpart Roscosmos, increasingly conducted through the media. On Aug. 12, Russian state news agency TASS carried a report accusing a US astronaut of deliberately sabotaging the International Space Station, a story swiftly denied by NASA.
China — functionally banned from cooperating with the International Space Station and NASA by a 2011 US congressional edict, the Wolf Amendment — is pushing rapidly ahead with its own space station in low Earth orbit, with three Chinese astronauts on a multi-week orbital mission including space walks that are to conclude this month.
Russia and China have signed a memorandum to work together on a moon base, although the dates for any such mission remain unclear. NASA’s Artemis 1 — its largest rocket since the Apollo program — is to blast off later this year to test the systems the US hopes will send its astronauts back to the moon by 2023, another sign of a new Cold War-style space race.
However, compared with that historic rivalry, the new competition in space is much more complex. It includes many more players, among them private companies, and ranges from electronic warfare and anti-satellite weapons in low Earth orbit to what might be the early stages of a battle to colonize the solar system, particularly Mars.
In near Earth orbit, experts say that multiple countries are taking a new interest in the potential military use of space, founding organizations such as the US Space Force. In July last year, the US and Britain accused Russia of testing an anti-satellite weapon after a Russian satellite approached close to a US counterpart.
Washington and its Western allies have long argued against the military use of space, warning that incidents such as the 2007 destruction of a defunct Chinese satellite by a rocket fired from Earth risk creating potentially catastrophic levels of space debris.
However, US media recently reported that the US was now considering declassifying its own anti-satellite capabilities, a sign that Washington might now believe an arms race cannot be avoided.
The US and China have sent and operated probes to Mars this year, with China’s Zhurong (祝融號) rover operating there continuously for the past three months. The more sophisticated NASA Perseverance has been active since February, including deploying a small experimental helicopter. Both were presented as reconnaissance for long-term crewed missions, although these might be decades away.
China in particular has much longer-term goals. Last week, state-run media highlighted a report from the National Natural Science Foundation of China calling for Beijing to explore the manufacture of vast space platforms, assembled in orbit and 1km or more in length — 10 times the size of the International Space Station.
Such a feat would require overcoming massive technical challenges, Chinese scientists were reported as saying — but studying the feasibility of the project is set to be part of Beijing’s 2021 to 2025 economic plan.
China’s current space station might find itself the only crewed platform in orbit if the International Space Station cannot be extended until 2030 as the US hopes.
Russia last week said that one of its modules on the station was showing cracks that would worsen and has warned of a potential avalanche of equipment failures as soon as 2025.
While the US has signed agreements with European and Asian allies to cooperate on its Artemis program, China is also reaching out to other nations, particularly developing countries, and might extend collaboration to Russia as part of its broader growing partnership with Moscow.
US and Russian space authorities and media have been in a growing war of words in the past few months.
In July, several US media firms, including the Daily Beast and tech site Ars Technica, ran stories questioning the competence of Russia’s space program after rockets on a Russian module activated, apparently spontaneously, shortly after its arrival at the station.
The US was left dependent on Russia to get astronauts to and from the International Space Station following the termination of its space shuttle program in 2011, but last year resumed its own crewed spaceflight.
Relations have since deteriorated further, even as Moscow has moved closer to other emerging space powers such as India and the United Arab Emirates, hosting training for astronauts of both.
These alliances are important — another reason that Washington is striking its own deals with allies such as the UK, Japan and European powers to join in with Artemis. The international battle for control of space is only just beginning and there is little appetite to be on the losing side.
Peter Apps is a writer on international affairs, globalization, conflict and other issues. He is the founder and executive director of the Project for Study of the 21st Century, a non-national, non-partisan, non-ideological think tank.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.