As the government plans its “bilingual national development center” to boost general proficiency in English among Taiwanese, it should devote some effort to improving the overall learning environment, while allowing students with different goals to thrive.
The Cabinet on Thursday approved a draft bill for the center’s establishment by the National Development Council, as part of its plan to make the nation bilingual by 2030. The council said that bilingual talent is in greater demand as more transnational firms invest in Taiwan and local firms connect to global supply chains. The Ministry of Education also plans to spend about NT$587 million (US$21.19 million) funding bilingual education programs at universities nationwide.
To make sure the money is not wasted, the government should consider some questions: Is the nation’s general environment favorable for English learners? Why are many Taiwanese still not fluent in English even though they start learning it in elementary school or earlier?
Although the council in 2016 issued guidelines for the bilingual presentation of signage for local governments, many road signs still contain inconsistent or incomprehensible translations, which need to be remade.
For example, the media in October last year found various translations of “Gaomei Wetlands” (高美濕地) on public signs in Taichung, including “Gaomei Wetland” and “Gaomei Everglade,” and an installation nearby even read: “KAOMAY.” Hualien County’s Daxue Road (大學路) was once translated into “Big Xue Street,” while Provincial Highway No. 9 (台九線) was translated to “Taiwan nine lines” in Taitung County.
Seeking to improve general English proficiency through education is probably a step in the right direction, but Taiwan’s education system involves too much “cramming.” Students in Taiwan generally spend a disproportionate amount of time memorizing facts and vocabulary for exams. They might ace English tests, but struggle to speak the language in real-world settings.
National Taiwan Normal University in March last year released a report showing that Taiwan was lagging behind China, Japan and South Korea on English vocabulary taught in classrooms and total class hours devoted to English.
Elementary and junior-high school students in Taiwan are only required to learn 300 and 1,200 English words respectively, fewer than the other three countries, the report said, advising the education ministry to adjust the requirements for students. It is regrettable that the university only offered an uncreative suggestion, considering it is one of the nation’s strongholds for cultivating English-teaching talent.
For Taiwan to be considered bilingual, its citizens must be able to use English for daily communication as they would Mandarin. Instead of pushing learners to memorize more vocabulary, authorities should consider how to trigger learners’ “intrinsic motivation” to explore a language’s usage and cultural context even after they leave a classroom.
Rather than opening more bilingual education centers, the government should allocate more funding to support students who wish to travel to English-speaking countries or for exchange programs.
However, is it really necessary for every Taiwanese to learn English, regardless of their career goals? If the government hopes to protect the native languages used by various ethnic groups through the Development of National Languages Act (國家語言發展法), how can it avoid restricting the development of local languages when it is emphasizing English?
Instead of imposing more exams on students and civil servants, the authorities should — in addition to promoting internationalization — allow people with different specialties and interests to develop their strengths in other areas as well.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry