The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has announced its intention to curtail “excessive” incomes and redistribute wealth within society. This follows a clampdown on tech companies within the country.
Observers have been quick to make two primary conclusions: First, that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and the CCP are keeping the wealthy in check while ensuring that wealth is subservient to political power; and second, that Xi and the party are proving their true colors as communists. These conclusions are not wrong, but they are part of the grander strategy behind the actions of Xi and the party.
Ever since coming to power, Xi has worked tirelessly to cement his position at the helm of the People’s Republic of China. He has purged opponents in the name of “anti-corruption campaigns,” and cracked down on separatism and dissent in Xinjiang and Hong Kong, but most importantly he has placed his ideology among the pantheon of communist thinkers. Over the years, we have grown familiar with the term “Xi Jinping thought,” which encapsulates Xi’s vision for China and its road to “socialism with Chinese characteristics.”
On the surface, his contributions to the party’s ideology seem to be a mere formality. His predecessors also offered their own flavor to “socialism with Chinese characteristics.” Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) championed the “scientific outlook on development,” while Jiang Zemin (江澤民) marked his leadership with the “three represents.” These guiding theories, by and large, followed the line of Deng Xiaoping’s (鄧小平) theory of reforming China and opening up to the world.
However, “Xi Jinping thought” is a break from its predecessors and recent developments in China demonstrate that.
China under Xi has broken many norms of the past. He abolished term limits, instilled greater party discipline, and openly furthered and defended China’s interests domestically and abroad through coercive means.
All of this has been done in the name of “national rejuvenation” and to achieve “the Chinese dream.” His bold claims for his vision of the country were once easy to shrug off as propaganda and empty words. Today, we must recognize that Xi means what he says.
In the latest edition of Foreign Affairs magazine, Jude Blanchette wrote that, unlike Xi, “Deng Xiaoping demonstrated strategic patience in asserting China’s interests on the global stage.”
Indeed, Deng called for the country and its successive leadership to “bide its time.” Xi’s critics argue that he has sinned for pursuing policies contrary to Deng’s advice.
However, pointing out Xi’s demonstration of impatience as hubris or a mistake misses the point. China today is stronger than it was 20 years ago, and it is undeniably more economically and militarily capable since Xi took power. China has bided its time and is ready to carry out the next phase of its revolution.
When we look at what is happening in China today, we must apply all the lenses available to us, including the ideological one. It is most certain that the party’s clampdown on tech companies and the wealthy is its way to assert authority; it is just as likely that it was done to reach the next phase of building “socialism with Chinese characteristics,” just as when Josef Stalin ended the New Economic Policy (a period of liberalization for the peasantry within the Soviet Union) and radically shifted to agricultural collectivization.
Xi is a man on a revolutionary mission. He has sought to recreate China in his image and he has so far succeeded. The personality cult surrounding him reminds many of Mao Zedong (毛澤東); he has brought Hong Kong to its knees and has maintained economic growth, despite the COVID-19 pandemic.
Deng famously said that it does not matter if a cat is black or white, so long as it catches mice. Xi and the party are out to achieve their goals by any means necessary, and that goal is making China an unchallengeable great power. Everything it does now is another brick in the road to realizing “Xi Jinping thought.”
Nigel Li is a student at the Moscow State Institute of International Relations.
Speaking at the Asia-Pacific Forward Forum in Taipei, former Singaporean minister for foreign affairs George Yeo (楊榮文) proposed a “Chinese commonwealth” as a potential framework for political integration between Taiwan and China. Yeo said the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait is unsustainable and that Taiwan should not be “a piece on the chessboard” in a geopolitical game between China and the US. Yeo’s remark is nothing but an ill-intentioned political maneuver that is made by all pro-China politicians in Singapore. Since when does a Southeast Asian nation have the right to stick its nose in where it is not wanted
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has released a plan to economically integrate China’s Fujian Province with Taiwan’s Kinmen County, outlining a cross-strait development project based on six major themes and 21 measures. This official document by the CCP is directed toward Taiwan’s three outlying island counties: Penghu County, Lienchiang County (Matsu) and Kinmen County. The plan sets out to construct a cohabiting sphere between Kinmen and the nearby Chinese city of Xiamen, as well as between Matsu and Fuzhou. It also aims to bring together Minnanese cultural areas including Taiwan’s Penghu and China’s cities of Quanzhou and Zhangzhou for further integrated
During a recent visit to Taiwan, I encountered repeated questions about “America skepticism” among the body politic. The basic premise of the “America skepticism” theory is that Taiwan people should view the United States as an unreliable, self-interested actor who is using Taiwan for its own purposes. According to this theory, America will abandon Taiwan when its interests are advanced by doing so. At one level, such skepticism is a sign of a healthy, well-functioning democratic society that protects the right for vigorous political debate. Indeed, around the world, the people of Taiwan are far from alone in debating America’s reliability
As China’s economy was meant to drive global economic growth this year, its dramatic slowdown is sounding alarm bells across the world, with economists and experts criticizing Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for his unwillingness or inability to respond to the nation’s myriad mounting crises. The Wall Street Journal reported that investors have been calling on Beijing to take bolder steps to boost output — especially by promoting consumer spending — but Xi has deep-rooted philosophical objections to Western-style consumption-driven growth, seeing it as wasteful and at odds with his goal of making China a world-leading industrial and technological powerhouse, and